BIR Ruling No. 421-2021

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Quezon City

Secs. 24(C),175 & 176,Tax Code, as amended BIR Ruling No. OT-0653-2020 01-721-2021

NoV f

Sun Life of Canada (Philippines), Inc. 2nd Floor, Sun Life Centre, 5th Avenue corner Rizal Drive Bonifacio Global City, Taguig City

Attention: Atty. Marie Kristel D. Virtudez

Tax Manager

Gentlemen:

This refers to your request for exemption from payment of capital gains tax (CGT) and donor's tax on the foliowing transfer of Manila Polo Club ("MPC" or "Club") shares, owned by Sun Life of Canada Philippines, Inc. ("Sun Life" or the "Company"), from the former company playing representatives to the new Company playing representatives.

Background

1. Sun Life is a domestic corporation authorized to engage in the business of life

insurance, including accident and health insurance.

2. It owns MPC shares then appoints as playing representatives its officers for the latter

to be able to make use of its facilities in building their business network. The above described transfers are without consideration and purely for the purpose of aiding the respective Company playing representatives to build a network which the Company believes will benefit its business in general.

3. Due to MPC's policy and in order to avail of the privileges of the Club, proprietary

shares were issued to the following former Company playing representatives and are now being transferred to the new Company playing representatives:

Rizalina G. Mantaring Gregory S. Martin Harry H. Manuel Transferor Ma. Karenina M. Casas Maria Lourdes D. Lopa Benedicto C. Sison Transferee Certificate No. Membership

Or-621-2021

NON 0 8 2021

Sunlife of Canada (Philippines), Inc Page 2 of 6

4. The Company playing representatives deposed in their respective unilateral Declarations of Trust dated August 30, 2012 and November 17, 2008 that:

a. The Sun Life is the true and beneficial owner of the subiect proprietary share of

b. He/She was appointed to represent the MPC share actually owned by the Company since it is provided in the Articles of Incorporation and By-laws of MPC that no MPC:

c. The registration in his/her name was necessary to comply with the rules of MPC that only a natural person shall be admitted as a proprietary member; institutional members are to be admitted as shareholder;

e. In any event that happening of which will cause him/her to cease from being the d. He/She does not have any title, right, claim or interest whatsoever over:the said company officer designated to hold the share and enjoy the benefit and privileges MPC share; and thereof, the management of Sun Life may designate any other company officer it

seems qualified to be the new holder of the share.

In reply, please be informed as follows:

to Transferee is not subject to CGT. The transfer of MPC shares from Transferor

Upon execution of the declaration of trust, a trust relationship was created between the Company and the declarant/appointee.

and another person owning the legal title to such property, the equitable ownership of the former entitling him to the performance of certain duties and the exercise of certain powers by the latter. What distinguishes a trust from other relations is the separation of the legal title and equitable A trust is a legal relationship between one person having an equitable ownership of property

ownership is vested in a cestui que trust. l ownership of the property. In a trust relation, legal title is vested in the fiduciary while equitable

acknowledges that the property, title to which he holds, is held by him for the use of another.? In relation thereto, a declaration of trust has been defined as an act by which a person

and that they are holding only the legal ownership of the same with the beneficial ownership pertaining to the Company. Here, the Trustor and the cestui que trust is the Company while the fiduciaries, also known as the trustees, are the declarants/appointees. that the transfer did not give them any kind of right, claim, or interest whatsoever in the MPC share In the Declarations of Trust which the declarants/appointees executed, they acknowledged

1 Soledad Caezo substituted by William Caezo and Victoriano Caezo v. Concepcion Rojas, G.R. No. 148788, November 2 Resurreccion de Leon, et al. v. Emiliano Molo-Peckson, et al., G.R. No. L-17809, December 29, 1962. 23, 2007.

U NOv t 8 212t

Sunlife of Canada (Philippines), Inc. Page 3 of 6

A trust arises in favor of one who pays the purchase money of property in the name of another, because of the presumption that he who pays for a thing intends a beneficial interest therein for himself.3 The principle of a resulting trust is based on the equitable doctrine that valuable consideration, and not legal title, determines the equitable title or interest and are presumed always to have been contemplated by the parties. They arise from the nature or circumstances of the consideration involved in a transaction whereby one person thereby becomes invested with legal title but is obligated in equity to hold his legal title for the benefit of another.4

In the case of Sime Darby Pilipinas, Inc. v. Mendozas, Sime Darby acquired a Class "A" club share in Alabang Country Club ("ACC") in 1987, but being a corporation which was expressly disallowed by ACC's By-Laws to acquire and register the club share under its name, registered the share under the name of respondent Mendoza, Sime Darby's sales manager at the time. The Supreme Court held that a trust arrangement existed between Sime Darby and Mendoza and while the share was bought by Sime Darby and placed under the name of Mendoza, the latter's title was only limited to the use and enjoyment of the club's facilities and privileges while employed with the company.

In the instant case, Sun Life, the purchaser of the MPC shares, intends to give legal title thereto to its Trustee-appointees, which title entitles the Trustee-appointees only to the!use and enjoyment of the club's facilities since, under the Articles of Incorporation and By-lawsjof MPC only natural persons may become registered members.

The transfer of the legal title of the MPC shares from the former Trustee-appointees ("Transferors") to the new Trustee-appointees ("Transferees"), is not subject to CGT considering that the transfer involves neither monetary consideration nor change in beneficial ownership.

Section 24 (C) of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997 (Tax Code), as amended provides that CGT is imposed upon the net capital gains realized during the taxable year from the sale, barter, exchange or other disposition of shares of stock in a domestic corporation, except shares sold, or disposed of through the Stock Exchange. In other words, CGT is imposed on the gain or profit from the sale of capital assets.

In this case, the MPC shares will be transferred from the Transferors' name to Transferees name. Since the Transferors only possessed legal title over the MPC shares, the transfer of the subject shares in favor of the Transferees will be limited only to the transfer of the legal title

3 Marsh Thomson v. Court of Appeais and the American Chamber of Commerce of the Philippines, Inc., G.R. No

6 Safud v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA EB Case No. 412, April 30, 2009. 4 Spouses Trinidad v. Imson, G.R. No. 197728, September 16, 2015. 5 G.R. No. 202247, June 19, 2013. 116631, October 28, 1998

O NN 2 $te E2

Sunlife of Canada (Philippines), inc Page 4 of 6

owning the proprietary shares, hence, must assign someone to use the club facilities on it$ behalf. Transferees is to make them an extension of the Company's ownership over the same. Practically speaking, being a juridical entity, the Company cannot directly enjoy the priviieges that come with The intention of the Company in giving legal title of the proprietary shares to the

Since the beneficial ownership over the MPC share remains with the Company, there is no actual transfer of ownership of the MPC shares as between the Company and its Trustee-appointees and/or from such Transferors to the Transferees, and hence, no gain or profit shall be recognized.

owned by Sun Life, and the Transferors and the Transferees are mere nominees and/or trustees of THEREFORE, considering that i) the aforementioned proprietary shares are!actually

Sun Life; 2) there is no actual transfer of ownership and beneficial title; and 3) no monetary consideration is involved, no gain or profit resulted in the Transfer which is merely by virtue of

that the transfer is not subject to CGT. an assignment as evidenced by the Declarations of Trust. Such being the case, this Office confirms

The Transfer is not subject to donor's tax.

and (3) the intent to do an act of liberality (animus donandi). are: (1) the reduction of the patrimony of the donor; (2) the increase in the patrimony of the donee; Well-settled in our jurisprudence is the fact that the essential elements of a valid donation

fide transaction effected solely for business reasons. MPC shares since the transaction is purely for a legitimate business purpose. Thus, the transfer will not be subject to donor's tax since there is no intention to donate, and the transaction is a bona Clearly, there is no intention on the part of the Transferors to donate to the Transferees the

The Transfer is not subject to documentary stamp tax (DST).

The transfer is not subject to DST under Section 175 of the Tax Code, as amended.

The rule in this jurisdiction is that the assignment of shares of stock of a domestic corporation is subject to DST upon execution of the deed transferring ownership or rights thereto or upon delivery, assignment or indorsement of such shares in favor of another.

Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 13-2004, implementing the provisions of Republic Act

exchange to be taxable, there must be an actual or constructive transfer of beneficial ownership (RA) No. 9243, otherwise known as "An Act Rationalizing Further the Structure and Administration of the Documentary Stamp Tax" qualified this rule by stating that for a sale or

NOV 1 8 2021

Sunlife of Canada (Philippines), Inc. Page 5 of 6

of the shares of stock from one person to another. Section 4 thereof provides:

"For a sale or exchange to be taxable, there must be an actual or constructive transfer of beneficial ownership of the shares of stock from one person to another. Such transfer may be manifested by the clear exercise of attributes of ownership over such stocks by the transferee, or by an actual entry of a change in the name appearing in the certificate of stock or in the Stock and Transfer Book of the issuing corporation or by any entry indicating transfer of beneficial ownership in any form of registry including those of a duly authorized scripless registry, such as those maintained for or by the Philippine Stock Exchange. However, if by the transfer of certificates of stock from a resigned trustee to a newly appointed trustee such certificate of stock remain in the name of the cestui que trust or the resigned trustee so that the new trustee is constituted as mere depository of the stock, such transfer is not taxable. Provided, however, that transfer of shares to "nominees" to qualify them to sit in the board or to qualify them to perform any act in relation to the corporation shall not be subject to the DST provided herein only upon proof of Ja duly executed Nominee Agreement showing the purpose of the transfer; that the transfer is without consideration other than the undertaking of the nominee to only represent the beneficial owner of the stock; and the transfer is in trust."- (Emphasis and underscoring supplied.)

The herein transfer comply with the afore-cited rules. First, there is no actual or constructive transfer of the beneficial ownership of the shares. Only the legal title was tranferred

and by the express provisions of the Declarations of Trust, the intention of the parties was clearly when the Company changed its former appointee to the new appointee. Second, the execution of

for the former appointees and the new appointees to hold the shares in trust for the Company.

Furthermore, in the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. First Express Pawnshop.

pay the DST, to wit: Inc.7, the Supreme Court explained that Sections 175 and 176 of the Tax Code, as amended, on DST contemplates the execution of a subscription agreement in order for a taxpayer to bejliable to

contemplate a subscription agreement in order for a taxpayer to be liable to pay the "As pointed out by the CTA, Sections 175 and 176 of the Tax Code

DST. A subscription contract is defined as any contract for the acquisition of unissued stocks in an existing corporation or a corporation still to be formed. A stock subscription is a contract by which the subscriber agrees to take a certain number of shares of the capital stock of a corporation, paying for the same or expressly or impliedly promising to pay for the same. "

7 G.R. Nos. 172045-46, June 16, 2009

OT-421 -21021 NOV 0 8 2021

Page 6 of 6 Sunlife of Canada (Phiippines), Inc.

that there would be no transfer of beneficial ownership of the MPC shares. The same remains with ownership of the share is, therefore, not the taxable transaction being contemplated under the Tax Code provisions on DST. That the transfer from the former trustee to the new trustee is without a subscription agreement or any kind of consideration is indicative of the real intention of the parties Sun Life. A mere transfer of a share from one tr:stee to another, without change in the beneficial

MPC shares or over the assets of MPC. There being no new conveyance to speak of in this case, there is no new exercise of a privilege upon which DST may be imposed. However, the notarial acknowledgment to the Deeds of Declarations of Trust is subject to DST imposed under Section conveyance to the new trustees of the beneficial ownership of any right, claim or interest.over the 185 of the Tax Code, as amended. THEREFORE, the herein transfer cannot be subject to DST as there are no transfer or

Secretary of the Club to effect the transfer of the MPC shares in the name of the Transferee- appointees without the necessary Tax Clearance (TCL) and/or Certificate Authorizing Registration It is, however, understood that this Ruling shall not serve as authority to the Corporate

Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 37-2012. (CAR) issued by this Bureau. In this regard, this Ruling shall be presented to the Revenue District Office (RDO) concerned in order for the latter to issue the TCL/CAR as prescribed in Revenue

upon investigation, it will be ascertained that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if

considered null and void.

Very truly yours,

asa

Commissioner of Internal Revenue CAESAR R. DULAY I 04713 K-