CE CASECNAN WATER AND ENERGY COMPANY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY SPECIAL FIRST DIVISION CE CASEC NAN WATER AND CTA CASE No . 9006 EN ERGY COMPANY, INC ., For: Refund Petitioner, -versus- Members: DEL ROSARIO, P.J., Chairperson CO MM ISSIONER O F UY, and INTE RNAL REVENU E, MINDARO-GRULLA, JJ. Respondent. Promulgated: . � jcJ., 50 .,.""Y\ x----��------------------------------------------------------------x DECISION MINDARO - GRULLA, J.: This is a Petition for Review, 1 with Supplemental Petition for Review/ filed by petitioner CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. (CE Casecnan) on March 12, 2015 and June 11, 2015, respectively, pursuant to Section 7(a)(1) 3 of Republic Act (RA) No. 1125,4 as amended, as 1 Dockets, Vol. I, pp. 6-17. 2 Dockets, Vol. I, pp. 124-137. 3 Sec. 7. Jurisdiction. -The CTA shall exercise: (a) Exclusive appellate jurisdiction to review by appeal, as herein provided: (1) Decisions of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in cases involving disputed assessments, refunds of internal revenue taxes, fees or other charges, penalties in relation thereto, or other matters arising under the National Internal Revenue Code or other laws administered by the Bureau of Internal Revenue; XXX 4 Act Creating the Court of Tax Appeals. t

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 2 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION well as Section 3(a)(1) 5 of Rule 4 and Section 4(a)6 of Rule 8 of the Revised Rules of the Court of Tax Appeals, as amended. Petitioner CE Casecnan seeks the issuance of a tax credit certificate (TCC) in the total amount of Seven Million Seven Hundred Fifty Seven Thousand Four Hundred Sixty Eight and 99/100 Pesos (P7, 757,468. 99), allegedly representing unutilized input value-added tax (VAT) paid for the 1st quarter to the 4th quarter of calendar year (CY) 2013. Petitioner is a domestic corporation duly organized and existing under Philippine laws, with principal office at Pantabangan, Nueva Ecija. The primary purpose of petitioner's business is "to design, develop, construct, erect, assemble, commission, finance, own and operate a combined irrigation and hydro-electric power project and related facilities in Central Luzon, Philippines for the conversion into electricity of water provided by and under contract with the National Irrigation Administration (NIA) and for the supply of water for agricultural purposes to the National Irrigation Administration (the "Project"); provided that, in no event shall the corporation itself engage in the general supply or distribution of electricity, in retail trade or in the business of a public utility, or furnish electricity to 5 Sec. 3. Cases within the jurisdiction of the Court in Division.- The Court in Division shall exercise: (a) Exclusive original over or appellate jurisdiction to review by appeal the following: (1) Decisions of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in cases involving disputed assessments, refunds of internal revenue taxes, fees or other charges, penalties in relation thereto, or other matters arising under the National Internal Revenue Code or other laws administered by the Bureau of Internal Revenue. 6 Sec. 4. Where to appeal; mode of appeal.- (a) An appeal from a decision or ruling or the inaction of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue on disputed assessments or claim for refund of internal revenue taxes erroneously or illegally collected, the decision or ruling of the Commissioner of Customs, the Secretary of Finance, the Secretary of Trade & Industry, the Secretary of Agriculture, and the Regional Trial Court in the exercise of their original jurisdiction, shall be taken to the Court by filing before it a petition for review as provided in Rule 42 of the Rules of Court. The Court in Division shall act on the appeal. L

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 3 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION end-users or consumers, or provide a public service or engage in industries or activities reserved by the Constitution or by law to corporations wholly or partially owned by Filipino citizens. "7 Petitioner is registered with the BIR as a value-added tax (VAT) taxpayer with Taxpayer Identification No. 004- 500-931-000.8 Respondent is the duly appointed Commissioner of Internal Revenue empowered to perform the duties of said office including, among others, the power to decide, approve, and grant refunds or tax credits of erroneously paid taxes, as provided by law. He may be served summons, pleadings and other processes at his office at the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) National Office Building, BIR Road, Diliman, Quezon City. On November 4, 2014, CE Casecnan filed with the CIR an administrative claim for refund of its excess and unutilized input VAT for the 1st quarter to the 4th quarter of CY 2013 in the amount ofP22,944,645.77. 9 On March 11, 2015, its original Petition for Review was filed by CE Casecnan. On March 31, 2015, an Answer10 was filed by the CIR. The CIR's Pre-Trial Brief11 was filed on April 21, 2015, while CE Casecnan's Pre-Trial Brief12 was filed on January 29, 2016. On May 8, 2015, CE Casecnan received from the CIR Tax Credit Certificate (TCC) No. 200600004679 dated April 8, 2015 in the amount of P15,142,641.11, representing input VAT for the 1st to 4th quarters of 2013, which the CIR 7 Joint Stipulations of Facts and Issues, Par. 3, Dockets, Vol. I, p. 413-414. 8 Ibid., par. 4, p. 414. 9 Ibid., par. 5, p. 414. 10 Dockets, Vol. I, pp. 90-100. 11 Dockets, Vol. I, pp. 103-106. 12 Dockets, Vol. I, pp. 171-182. t.

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 4 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION granted out of the total input VAT claimed by CE Casecnan in the amount of P22,944,645.77. The following amounts of CE Casecnan's input VAT were disallowed by the then CIR in her decision on CE Casecnan's administrative claim for refund: Input VAT on goods/items reclassified as p 6,651,205.10 capital goods 635,855.07 Input VAT claims on amortized capital goods. 470,408.82 Input VAT paid to the Bureau of Customs (BOC) on importations which were included in p 7,757,468.99 the authority to issue VAT credit/refund but were excluded in the tax credit certificate issued. TOTAL Because of the partial grant of the CIR as to CE Casecnan's claim, on June 11, 2015, a Motion for Leave to File and Admit Supplemental Petition for Review (with Motion for Partial Withdrawal) with attached Supplemental Petition for Review13 was filed by CE Casecnan. On September 16, 2015, sans CIR's comment, the Court granted CE Casecnan's Motion for Leave to File and Admit Supplemental Petition for Review (with Motion for Partial Withdrawal). 14 Accordingly, the Supplemental Petition for Review was admitted and the original Petition for Review was partially withdrawn, but only up to the extent of P15,187,176.71 of CE Casecnan's claim for refund. No answer was filed by the CIR to the Supplemental Petition for Review (with Motion for Partial Withdrawal) .15 The parties filed their Joint Stipulation of Facts and Issues (JSFI) 16 on March 15, 2016, which was approved by the Court via Resolution 17 dated March 22, 2016. On March 23, 2016, CE Casecnan filed a Motion to Commission an Independent Certified Public Accountant, 18 13 Dockets, Vol. I, pp. 117-123. 14 Resolution, Dockets, Vol. I, pp. 151-153. 15 Records Verification dated October 7, 2015, Dockets, Vol. I, p. 154. 16 Dockets, Vol. I, pp. 413-423. 17 Dockets, Vol. I, p. 444. (

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 5 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION which was granted by the Court via Resolution 19 on April 281 2016. The ICPA Report was filed by CE Casecnan on May 19, 2016. CE Casecnan presented witnesses Ms. Leilah Yasmin E. Alpad on April 19, 201620 and ICPA Commissioner Mr. Emmanuel Y. Mendoza on July 28, 2016. 21 On August 25, 2016, CE Casecnan filed its Formal Offer of Evidence22 offering Exhibits "P-1", "P-2", "P-3", "P-4", "P- 5", "P-6", "P-6-2", "P-7" to "P-14", "P-15", "P-16"1 "P-17'', 2"2P23---11189""Bt'o"", P"P-"1P-29-2"2'-44-"91P"A-'2"0"P"t'o-2"3P"--P12-A02"-4'1-""1'PG-""2P,3-2-1"1PB--1"2"4tot-o1"5P"AP-2"-32-t1o1-93A0"P""''-2""PP4--- 15G", "P-25", "P-26-1" to "P-26-7"1 "P-27-1" to "P-27-70", "P-28-1" to "P-28-65", "P-29-1" to "P-29-4", "P-30-1" to "P- 30-4" I "P-31-1" to "P-31-4" f "P-32" f "P-33-1" to "P-33-4" f ""PP--3540"",' "P-35-1" t o"P"-P5-13"5-a3n"d' "P-36-1" toas"Pit-s36d-o1c2u"m' e"Pn-t3a7ry" "P-50-A", "P-51-A" evidence. The CIR filed his Comment (Re: Petitioner's Formal Offer of Evidence)23 on August 31, 2016. In a Resolution24 dated October 26, 2016, the Court admitted Exhibits "P-1" I "P-2" f "P-3" f "P-4" f "P-5" f "P-6" f "P- 6-2" 0' "P -7" to - "P- 1"4P" -' "P-15 t"o' ""PP--1261"-'3"0P"-11 7'' '- "P-18 " o' ""PP-1-292" -' "P-2 "1 "P- 20 1", 21-1" "P 22-1" t '49" "P-23-1A" "P-23-1 B" to "P-23-19A" "P-23-19B" "P-f I f 24-1A" to "P-24-1G", "P-24-15A" to "P-24-15G", "P-25", "P- 26-1" to "P-26-7", "P-27-1" to "P-27-70", "P-28-1" to "P-28- 65" I "P-29-1" to "P-29-4" f "P-30-1" to "P-30-4" f "P-32" f "P- 33-1" to "P-33-4", "P-34", "P-35-1" to "P-35-3", "P-36-1" to "P-36-12", "P-37", "P-50", "P-50-A", "P-51" and "P-51-A" but denied the admission of Exhibits "P-31-1" to "P-31-4" for not being found on the records of the case. 18 Dockets, Vol. I, pp. 432-435. 19 Dockets, Vol. I, pp. 472-473. 20 Minutes of the hearing, Dockets, Vol. I, pp. 459-463. 21 Minutes of the hearing, Dockets, Vol. I, pp. 493-496. 22 Dockets, Vol. II, pp. 505-518. 23 Dockets, Vol. II, pp. 666-668. 24 Dockets, Vol. II, pp. 678-679. L

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 6 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION CE Casecnan filed a Motion for Reconsideration25 on November 14, 2016 sans comment from the CIR. The Court granted CE Casecnan's Motion for Reconsideration and admitted Exhibits "P-31-1" to "P-31-4" in the Resolution26 dated April 17, 2017. CE Casecnan's documentary exhibits are as follows: Exhibit Description P-1 Petitioner's Certificate of Filing of Amended P-2 Articles of Incorporation issued by the Securities & Exchange Commission (with P-3 attached Amended Articles of Incorporation) P-4 Petitioner's Certificate of Accreditation No. 95-07-12 issued by the Department of Energy P-5 ("DOE") Petitioner's Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) P-6 Certificate of Registration Amended and Restated Casecnan Project P-6-2 Agreement dated June 26, 1995 between Petitioner and NIA P-7 toP- Petitioner's Certificate of Compliance No. 10-1 14 06-GNS-10701 issued by the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) P-15 and Petitioner's administrative claim for refund P-16 filed with the BIR-Large Taxpayers Excise P-17 Audit Division I on November 4, 2014 P-18 Bureau of Internal Revenue Checklist of Mandatory Requirements for Claims for VAT P-19 Credit/Refund, with the mark Annex "A" Petitioner's original and amended Quarterly P-20 VAT Returns for the 1st quarter to 4th quarter of CY 2013 Petitioner's amended quarterly VAT Returns for the 1st quarter of CY 2014 to the 2nd quarter of 2014 Authority to Issue VAT Credit/Refund dated January 23, 2015 Tax Debit Memo dated November 12, 2015 signed by Assistant Commissioner (Large Taxpayers Service) Nestor S. Valeroso Letter dated January 27, 2015 signed by OIC- Assistant Commissioner Nestor S. Valeroso and addressed to CE Casecnan Water & Energy_ Co. Incorporated Sworn Statement of Ms. Leilah Yasmin E. 25 Dockets, Vol. II, pp. 697-700. 26 Dockets, Vol. II, pp. 723-724. ~

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 7 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION P-20-1 AI pad filed with the Honorable Court on January 29 2016 P-21-1 to Signature of Ms. AI pad in her Sworn P-21-30 Statement P-22-1 to Petitioner's VAT Zero-rated Official Receipts P-22-49 (ORs) P-23-1A Petitioner's Supporting VAT ORs for sales & P-23- subject to 12�/o VAT. 18 toP- Supporting VAT ORs and VAT invoices for 23-19A & input VAT on domestic purchases of services P-23-198 P-24-1A Supporting VAT ORs, VAT invoices and - P-24- Petitioner's general ledger for input VAT on 1G toP- domestic purchases of services directly 24-15A- related to construction-in-progress P-24-15G Supporting VAT invoice for input VAT on P-25 domestic purchases of goods Supporting BOC single administrative P-26-1 to document (SAD) and statement of settlement P-26-7 of duties and taxes (SSDD) evidencing the actual payment of VAT on importations P-27-1 to Supporting VAT invoice for input VAT on P-27-70 domestic purchases of capital goods P-28-1 to Supporting BOC single administrative P-28-65 document (SAD) and statement of settlement of duties and taxes (SSDD) evidencing the P-29-1 to actual payment of VAT on importations P-29-4 Amended quarterly VAT returns for the 1st, 2nd 3rd, & 4th quarters of CY 2014 P-30-1 to Amended quarterly VAT returns for the pt, P-30-4 2nd, 3rd, & 4th quarters of CY 2015 Petitioner's quarterly summary list of sales for P-31-1 to CY 2013 P-31-4 P-32 Petitioner's schedule revenues for CY 2013 P-33-1 to Petitioner's quarterly summary list of P-33-4 purchases for CY 2013 P-34 Petitioner's schedule of input VAT for CY 2013 P-35-1 to Petitioner's schedule of disallowed input VAT P-35-3 for CY 2013 P-36-1 to Certificate of final tax withheld at source for P-36-12 the pt 2nd, 3rd & 4th quarters for CY 2013 P-37 Petitioner's schedule of capitalizable assets P-50 ICPA report submitted to this Court on May 19, 2016 by Mr. Emmanuel Y. Mendoza P-50-A Signature of Mr. Mendoza in the ICPA report t.

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 8 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION P-51 Sworn Statement of Mr. Mendoza Sworn P-51-A Signature of Mr. Mendoza in the Statement -----------���- The CIR presented his lone witness, Revenue Officer MonicaL. Zamora, on June 27, 2017. 27 On July 07, 2017, the CIR filed his Formal Offer of Evidence28 offering Exhibits "R-1", "R-2", "R-3", "R-4", "R- 5" 1 "R-6" 1 "R-7" 1 "R-8" 1 "R-9" 1 "R-10" and "R-10-a" as his documentary exhibits. CE Casecnan filed its Comment29 on July 28, 2017. In the Resolution30 dated September 14, 2017, the Court admitted CIR's Formal Offer of Evidence except Exhibits "R-1"1 "R-2" 1 "R-3"1 "R-4"1 "R-5"1 "R-6" and "R-7" for failure to identify the said Exhibits. The CIR's documentary exhibits admitted by the Court are as follows: Exhibit Description R-8 Letter of Authority No. 121-2014-00000125 -- R-9 dated 17 November 2014 R-10 Memorandum Report dated 27 January 2015 Judicial Affidavit of RO Monica L. Zamora R-10-a Name and signature of RO Monica L. Zamora The Memorandum31 for the CIR was filed on October 18, 2017, while the Memorandum32 for CE Casecnan was filed on December 13, 2017. Hence, the case was declared submitted for decision on December 20, 2017. 33 The parties submitted the following issue for the Court's decision: 27 Order, Dockets, Vol. II. 28 Dockets, Vol. II. 29 Dockets, Vol. II. 30 Dockets, Vol. II. 31 Dockets, Vol. II. 32 Dockets, Vol. II. 33 Dockets, Vol. II. ~

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 9 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION Whether or not CE Casecnan is entitled to a refund of and/or issuance of a TCC for its unutilized input VAT for CY 2013 in the amount of P7,757,468. 99. In its original Petition for Review, CE Casecnan avers that its multipurpose irrigation and power plant project, with an installed capacity of 140-150 MW hydropower generation plant component, has been duly accredited and certified as a Private Sector Generation Facility by the Department of Energy (DOE) as evidenced by its Certificate of Accreditation No. 95-07-1234 issued by the DOE on July 20, 1995. CE Casecnan was also issued a Certificate of Compliance No. 10-06-GNS-1070135 by the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) for its Hydroelectric Generation Facilities on June 21, 2010. According to CE Casecnan, under Republic Act (RA) No. 9136, 36 otherwise known as the Electric Power Industry Reform Act of 2001 (EPIRA Law), sales of generated power by generation companies are VAT zero-rated beginning June 26, 2001. Also, Republic Act No. 9337, 37 which took effect on November 1, 2005, explicitly provides that sales by power generating companies, like CE Casecnan, of electricity produced through renewable sources of energy, such as hydropower, will continue to be zero-rated under Section 108(B)(7)38 of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) of 34 Exhibit "P-2," Dockets, Vol. II, p. 536. 35 Exhibit "P-5," Dockets, Vol. II, p. 613-618. 36 An Act Ordaining Reforms in the Electric Power Industry, Amending for the purpose certain Laws and for Other Purposes. 37 An Act Amending Sections 27, 28, 34, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 116, 117, 119, 121, 148, 151, 236, 237 and 288 of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as Amended, and for Other Purposes. 38 SEC. 108. Value-added Tax on Sale of Services and Use or Lease of Properties. - XXX XXX XXX (B) Transactions Subject to Zero Percent (0%) Rate. - The following services performed in the Philippines by VAT- registered persons shall be subject to zero percent (0%) rate. XXX XXX XXX (7) Sale of power or fuel generated through renewable sources of energy such as, but not limited to, biomass, solar, wind, hydropower, C-

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 10 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION 1997. Accordingly, input VAT on power generating companies' purchases of goods and services attributable to their zero-rated sales are allowed to be claimed for refund. As a VAT-registered person whose sales are zero-rated, CE Casecnan is entitled to a refund and/or tax credit of its unutilized input VAT pursuant to Section 112(A)39 of the NIRC of 1997. According to CE Casecnan, on the following dates, it filed with the BIR its Original Quarterly VAT Returns for the 1st to the 4th quarter of CY 2013, respectively: Taxable Quarter Date of Filing of Quarterly VAT Return and I Reference No. pt April 25, 2013/101300007221546 2nd July 25, 2013/101300007594311 3rd October 25, 2013/101300007977165 4th January 27, 2014/101400008419260 Subsequently, CE Casecnan filed with the BIR its Amended Quarterly VAT Returns for the 1st quarter to the 4th quarter of CY 2013, reflecting its zero-rated sales of generated power, domestic purchases of non-capital goods and services, purchases of capital goods, services rendered by non-residents and importation of non-capital goods. geothermal, ocean energy, and other emerging energy sources using technologies such as fuel cells and hydrogen fuels. 39 SEC. 112.Refunds or Tax Credits of Input Tax.- (A)Zero-Rated or Effectively Zero-Rated Sales.- Any VAT-registered person, whose sales are zero-rated or effectively zero-rated may, within two (2) years after the close of the taxable quarter when the sales were made, apply for the issuance of a tax credit certificate or refund of creditable input tax due or paid attributable to such sales, except transitional input tax, to the extent that such input tax has not been applied against output tax: Provided, however, That in the case of zero-rated sales under Section 106(A)(2)(a)(1), (2) and (b) and Section108 (B)(1) and (2), the acceptable foreign currency exchange proceeds thereof had been duly accounted for in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) :Provided, further, That where the taxpayer is engaged in zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sale and also in taxable or exempt sale of goods of properties or services, and the amount of creditable input tax due or paid cannot be directly and entirely attributed to any one of the transactions, it shall be allocated proportionately on the basis of the volume of sales: Provided, finally, That for a person making sales that are zero-rated under Section 108(B)(6), the input taxes shall be allocated ratably between his zero-rated and non-zero-rated sales. L

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 11 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION For the period covering the 1st quarter to the 4th quarter of CY 2013, CE Casecnan incurred unutilized input VAT from its purchases of capital goods as well as non- capital goods, domestic purchases of services, and services rendered by non-residents in the total amount of P45,563,530.95. Of the total accumulated input VAT of P45,236,415. 78, the amount P22,944,645. 77 is attributable to CE Casecnan's zero-rated sales of generated power to NIA under the Project for the 1st quarter to the 4th quarter of CY 2013. CE Casecnan claims that its unutilized input VAT from the 1st quarter to the 4th quarter of CY 2013 attributable to its zero-rated sales of generated power in the aggregate amount of P22,944,545. 77 was not applied or credited against any output VAT in the same or succeeding quarters. On November 4, 2014, CE Casecnan filed with the BIR LTEAD I an administrative claim for refund of the aforementioned unutilized input VAT in the amount of P22,944,645.77, together with supporting documents. CE Casecnan claims that the input VAT paid on its domestic purchases of non-capital goods and services, services rendered by non-residents, importation of non- capital goods and purchases of capital goods are duly supported and covered by VAT invoices and/or official receipts issued by VAT-registered suppliers in accordance with Sections 11340 and 23741 of the NIRC of 1997, or duly 40 SEC. 113. Invoicing and Accounting Requirements for VAT-Registered Persons.- (A)Invoicing Requirements.- A VAT-registered person shall issue: {1) A VAT invoice for every sale, barter or exchange of goods or properties; and (2) A VAT official receipt for every lease of goods or properties, and for every sale, barter or exchange of services. (B)Information Contained in the VAT Invoice or VAT Official Receipt.- The following information shall be indicated in the VAT invoice or VAT officia !receipt: {1) A statement that the seller is a VAT-registered person, followed by his taxpayer's identification number {TIN); (2) The total amount which the purchaser pays or is obligated to pay to the seller with the indication that such amount includes the value- added tax: Provided, That: f.,

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 12 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION validated Monthly Remittance Return of Value Added Tax (a) The amount of the tax shall be shown as a separate item in the invoice or receipt; (b) If the sale is exempt from value-added tax, the term "VAT-exempt sale" shall be written or printed prominently on the invoice or receipt; (c) If the sale is subject to zero percent (0%) value-added tax, the term "zero-rated sale" shall be written or printed prominently on the invoice or receipt; (d) If the sale involves goods, properties or services some of which are subject to and some of which are VAT zero- rated or VAT-exempt, the invoice or receipt shall clearly indicate the breakdown of the sale price between its taxable, exempt and zero-rated components, and the calculation of the value-added tax on each portion of the sale shall be shown on the invoice or receipt Provided, that the seller may issue separate invoices or receipts for the taxable, exempt, and zero-rated components of the sale. (3) The date of transaction, quantity, unit cost and description of the goods or properties or nature of the service; and (4) In the case of sales in the amount of one thousand pesos (P1,000) or more where the sale or transfer is made to a VAT-registered person, the name, business style, if any, address and taxpayer identification number (TIN) of the purchaser, customer or client. (C) Accounting Requirements.- Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 233, all persons subject to the value-added tax under Sections 106 and 108 shall, in addition to the regular accounting records required, maintain a subsidiary sales journal and subsidiary purchase journal on which the daily sales and purchases are recorded. The subsidiary journals shall contain such information as may be required by the Secretary of Finance. XXX XXX XXX 41 SEC. 237. Issuance of Receipts or Sales or Commercial Invoices.- All persons subject to an internal revenue tax shall, for each sale and transfer of merchandise or for services rendered valued at Twenty-five pesos (P25.00) or more, issue duly registered receipts or sale or commercial invoices, prepared at least in duplicate, showing the date of transaction, quantity, unit cost and description of merchandise or nature of service: Provided, however, That where the receipt is issued to cover payment made as rentals, commissions, compensation or fees, receipts or invoices shall be issued which shall show the name, business style, if any, and address of the purchaser, customer or client. The original of each receipt or invoice shall be issued to the purchaser, customer or client at the time the transaction is effected, who, if engaged in business or in the exercise of profession, shall keep and preserve the same in his place of business for a period of three (3) years from the close of the taxable year in which such invoice or receipt was issued, while the duplicate shall be kept and preserved by the issuer, also in his place of business, for a like period. The Commissioner may, in meritorious cases, exempt any person subject to an internal revenue tax from compliance with the provisions of this Section. t

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 13 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION Withheld filed by it on behalf of non-resident and non-VAT registered suppliers or import entry or other equivalent documents showing actual payment of VAT on the imported goods in accordance with Section 4.110-842 of Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 16-2005,43 as amended. According to CE Casecnan, the unutilized input VAT being claimed for refund are attributable to its zero-rated sales of generated power amounting to a total of P2, 765,134,894.69 paid in the course of its trade or business, are duly supported by VAT invoices and/or official receipts, withholding VAT returns and import entry or other equivalent documents were not carried forward to the 42 SEC. 4.110-8. Substantiation of Input Tax Credits. - (a) Input taxes for the importation of goods or the domestic purchase of goods, properties or services is made in the course of trade or business, whether such input taxes shall be credited against zero-rated sale, non-zero-rated sales, or subjected to the 5% Final Withholding VAT, must be substantiated and supported by the following documents, and must be reported in the information returns required to be submitted to the Bureau: (1) For the importation of goods - import entry or other equivalent document showing actual payment of VAT on the imported goods. (2) For the domestic purchase of goods and properties - invoice showing the information required under Sees. 113 and 237 of the Tax Code. (3) For the purchase of real property - public instrument i.e., deed of absolute sale, deed of conditional sale, contract/agreement to sell, etc., together with VAT invoice issued by the seller. (4) For the purchase of services - official receipt showing the information required under Sees. 113 and 237 of the Tax Code. A cash register machine tape issued to a registered buyer shall constitute valid proof of substantiation of tax credit only if it shows the information required under Sees. 113 and 237of the Tax Code. (a) Transitional input tax shall be supported by an inventory of goods as shown in a detailed list to be submitted to the BIR. (b) Input tax on "deemed sale" transactions shall be substantiated with the invoice required under Sec. 4.113-2 of these Regulations. (b) Input tax from payments made to non-residents (such as for services, rentals and royalties) shall be supported by a copy of the Monthly Remittance Return of Value Added Tax Withheld (BIR Form 1600) filed by the resident payor in behalf of the non-resident evidencing remittance of VAT due which was withheld by the payor. (c) Advance VAT on sugar shall be supported by the Payment Order showing payment of the advance VAT. 43 Consolidated Value-Added Tax Regulations of 2005. L

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 14 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION succeeding taxable quarter or quarters subsequent to the filing of the administrative claim with CIR, and have not been applied or credited against any of its output VAT. Without resolution of its administrative claim for refund despite the lapse of the 120-day period provided for under Section 112(C)44 of the NIRC of 1997, CE Casecnan was constrained to file the instant judicial claim. On the other hand, the CIR, in his Answer, avers that CE Casecnan failed to show that its purchases of non-capital goods and services were made in the course of its trade and business. It further failed to show that the said purchases were properly supported by VAT invoices and/or official receipts and other documents such as entries made in its subsidiary purchase journal showing that it actually paid VAT. It also failed to prove that the input taxes of P 22,944,645.77 allegedly paid on its purchases of goods and services, were attributable to its zero-rated sales and such have not been applied against any output tax and were not carried over in the succeeding taxable quarter or quarters. There was likewise no proof of compliance with the prescribed checklist of requirements to be submitted involving a claim for VAT refund pursuant to Revenue Memorandum Order (RMO) No. 53-98, 45 hence, there was no sufficient compliance with the filing of administrative claim for refund which is a condition sine qua non to the filing of judicial claim in accordance with the NIRC of 1997. 44 SEC. 112. Refunds or Tax Credits of Input Tax.- XXX XXX XXX C) Period within which Refund or Tax Credit of Input Taxes shall be Made.- In proper cases, the Commissioner shall grant a refund or issue the tax credit certificate for creditable input taxes within one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of submission of complete documents in support of the application filed in accordance with Subsection (A) hereof. In case of full or partial denial of the claim for tax refund or tax credit, or the failure on the part of the Commissioner to act on the application within the period prescribed above, the taxpayer affected may, within thirty (30) days from the receipt of the decision denying the claim or after the expiration of the one hundred twenty day-period, appeal the decision or the unacted claim with the Court of Tax Appeals. 45 Checklist of Documents to be Submitted by a Taxpayer upon Audit of his Tax Liabilities as well as of the Mandatory Reporting Requirements to be Prepared by a Revenue Officer, all of which Comprise a Complete Tax Docket. t

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 15 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION According to the CIR, there is no record of CE Casecnan ever submitting complete documents to substantiate its administrative claim for refund. Such is a requirement, otherwise, the administrative body will have sufficient reason to deny the claim. Far from complying with the checklist of requirements, CE Casecnan merely stated in the petition that it filed an administrative claim for refund together with supporting documents. Moreover, CE Casecnan's failure to submit documents supporting its claim for refund makes its administrative claim for refund pro forma. Thus, without a validly and duly filed administrative claim for refund, the Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the Petition for Review. However, as stated earlier, on April 8, 2015, the CIR issued TCC No. 200600004679 in favor of CE Casecnan in the amount of P15, 142,641.11, representing unutilized input VAT for the period of January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013, which CE Casecnan received on May 8, 2015. Thus, CE Casecnan filed its Supplemental Petition for Review, limiting the issue in the judicial claim only to the amount of P7,757,468.99. In its Supplemental Petition for Review, CE Casecnan reiterated its contention that it is entitled to refund of its unutilized input VAT. Further, it avers that input VAT relating to capital goods, as long as such purchases are attributable to zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales transactions, are to be allowed as refund. Thus, the input VAT on goods/items reclassified as capital goods by the CIR in the amount P6,651,205.10 should be allowed for refund. Also, as to the amount of P470,408.82 of input VAT paid to the BOC on importations, which were included in the authority to issue VAT credit/refund but were excluded in the Tax Credit Certificate (TCC) issued, CE Casecnan claims that it is still the CIR who has the jurisdiction to refund the said amount. We rule. t.

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 16 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION Section 112(A) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, lays down the requisites for the refund or tax credit of input tax due or paid attributable to zero-rated or effectively zero- rated sales, quoted hereunder for easy reference: "SEC. 112. Refunds or Tax Credits of Input Tax. (A) Zero-rated or Effectively Zero-rated Sales. - Any VAT-registered person, whose sales are zero- rated or effectively zero-rated may, within two (2) years after the close of the taxable quarter when the sales were made, apply for the issuance of a tax credit certificate or refund of creditable input tax due or paid attributable to such sales, except transitional input tax, to the extent that such input tax has not been applied against output tax: Provided, however, That in the case of zero-rated sales under Section 106(A)(2)(a)(1), (2) and (b) and Section108(8)(1) and (2), the acceptable foreign currency exchange proceeds thereof had been duly accounted for in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP): Provided, further, That where the taxpayer is engaged in zero-rated or effectively zero rated sale and also in taxable or exempt sale of goods or properties or services, and the amount of creditable input tax due or paid cannot be directly and entirely attributed to any one of the transactions, it shall be allocated proportionately on the basis of the volume of sales: Provided, finally, That for a person making sales that are zero-rated under Section 108(8)(6), the input taxes shall be allocated ratably between his zero-rated and non-zero rated sales." Based on the foregoing provision, in order to be entitled to a refund or tax credit of unutilized input VAT attributable to zero-rated sales, the following requisites must be satisfied: 1. that the taxpayer-claimant must be VAT-registered; 2. that there must be zero-rated or effectively zero- rated sales; 3. that input taxes were incurred or paid; t.

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 17 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION 4. that such input taxes were attributable to zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales; 5. that the input taxes were not applied against any output VAT liability; and 6. that the claim for refund was filed within the two- year prescriptive period. This Court shall determine first the timeliness of the filing of CE Casecnan's administrative and judicial claims. As explicitly stated in Section 112(A) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, the application for tax credit certificate or refund of unutilized excess input VAT must be filed within two years after the close of the taxable quarter when the zero-rated or effectively zero-rated sales were made. The present claim covers the four (4) taxable quarters of CY 2013 which closed on March 31, 2013, on June 30, 2013, on September 30, 2013, and on December 31, 2013, respectively. Records confirm that petitioner's administrative claim for refund was timely filed, as shown below: Period Close of Taxable Last Day for filing of Date of Filing of Covered Quarter Administrative Claim for Administrative (CY 2013) Refund Claim for Refund pt Quarter March 31, 2013 March 31, 2015 November 4, 2014 2nd Quarter June 30 2013 June 30 2015 3rd Quarter September 30, 2013 September 30 2015 4th Quarter December 31, 2013 December 31 2015 As to the timeliness of CE Casecnan's judicial appeal, the pertinent provision is Section 112(C) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, which states: ..SEC. 112. Refunds or Tax Credits of Input Tax. XXX XXX XXX (C) Period within which Refund or Tax Credit of Input Taxes shall be Made. - In proper cases, the Commissioner shall grant a refund or issue the tax credit certificate for creditable input taxes within one L

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 18 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION hundred twenty (120) days from the date of submission of complete documents in support of the application filed in accordance with Subsection (A) hereof. In case of full or partial denial of the claim for tax refund or tax credit, or the failure on the part of the Commissioner to act on the application within the period prescribed above, the taxpayer affected may, within thirty (30) days from the receipt of the decision denying the claim or after the expiration of the one hundred twenty day period, appeal the decision or the unacted claim with the Court of Tax Appeals." The CIR argues that since CE Casecnan failed to submit the required complete documents in support of the administrative claim, there was no valid and duly filed administrative claim for refund. As such, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain this Petition for Review. Records reveal that upon filing of the administrative claim on November 4, 2014,46 CE Casecnan simultaneously submitted the supporting documents, to wit: 1. BIR Registration Certificate 2. Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws (for corporation)/SEC Reg. 3. List of officers of the company I partners 4. 3 Copies of Application for Tax Credit (BIR Form 1914) 5. Copy of BIR Registration Payment for year of claim (BIR Form 0605)/Annual Registration Fee 6. Certified true copy of Quarterly VAT Return corresponding to the period of claim showing that the amount of TCC/refund being claimed was deducted from available input tax, as well as VAT Return/system 46 Annex A of Exhibit "P-6," Dockets, Vol. II, p. 621. t

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 19 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION 7. Copy of Annual Income Tax Return filed, or in case of quarterly claims the claimant shall submit certified true copy of Quarterly ITR (Form 1701Q or 1702Q) 8. Certified true copy of Audited Financial Statements complete with Notes to Financial Statements duly received by SIR/Authorized Agent Bank (AAB) 9. Sworn statements by the claimant certifying the following: a. The amount of sales declared with breakdown as to amount of zero-rated, taxable and exempt sales b. The company did not file any and I or will not file any similar claim from BOI, BOC and BIR 10. Verification of Delinquent Accounts from the concerned Revenue District Office (RDO)/Regional Collection Division/ Accounts Receivable Monitoring Division/LT Collection Enforcement Division/Large Taxpayers Division 11. Certification that claimant/taxpayer has no similar claim filed with other BIR processing/investigating office 12. Certification from BOI, BOC as well as from DOF-OSS where applicable, that subject taxpayer has not filed similar claim covering the same period 13. Company authorization designating the authorized representative to follow up the claim for VAT refund/credit 14. Affidavit under oath attesting to the completeness of the documents submitted (Annex B) (with copy of Checklist of Requirements as attachment) 15. Schedule of Purchases for period of claim with the following details: Registered Name of Supplier, TIN of Supplier, Invoice No., Date of Invoice, OR No., Date of OR, Amount of Purchase, Input Tax and Total Invoice Amount t

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 20 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION 16. Certified true copy of Sales Invoices for purchase of goods or OR with Statement of Account (S.A.) /Billing for services (arranged in accordance with schedule under 3.1) 17. Alphalist of Suppliers with the following information: Name, address and TIN of suppliers and total purchases per supplier 18. Soft copy the Schedule of Purchases (MS Excel) required under 3.1 19. Schedule of Zero-rated, Taxable and Exempt Sales with the following details: Taxable Sales- Sales Invoice/OR No., Date of Invoice/OR, Name of Buyer/Customer, Peso Value of Sale Exempt Sales- Sales Invoice/OR No., Date of Invoice/OR, Name of Buyer/Customer, Peso Value of Sale Zero-Rated Sales- Sales Invoice/OR No., Date of Invoice/OR, Name of Buyer/Customer AWB/BL No., Sales/Receipts in Foreign Currency, Conversion Rate, Peso Value of Sales, Date of Remittance, Name of Bank, Bank Credit Memo No. 20. Certified true copy of Sales Invoices and AWB/BL for sale of goods or Billings/Service Contracts for sale of services (arranged in accordance with schedule required under 4.1) 21. Soft copy of the Schedule of Sales (MS Excel) under 4.1 22. Copy of BIR Authority, in case claimant is using loose- leaf sales invoices/computerized accounting system 23. Schedule of Importations for period of claim with the following details: '-

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 21 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION Date of Invoice, Supplier, Description of Goods Imported, AWB/BL No., lED / SN No., Date of Arrival, Total Value, Date of Payment, 0. R. No. & VAT Payment 24. Soft copy of the Schedule required under 6.1 (MS Excel) 25. Certified true copy of Import Entry and Internal Revenue Declarations duly validate by bank with O.R. 26. Certified true copy of BOC receipts/Confirmation receipts evidencing payment of VAT 27. Schedule of input tax pertaining to purchases/ importation of over Php1 million that is amortized during the period claim 28. Certification of Accreditation from the DOE 29. Certificate of Compliance issued by the ERC 30. Project Agreement between CE Casecnan & NIA 31. BIR Forms 2306 32. Summary of Allocation of Input VAT 33. Books of accounts for 2013 34. BOC Certifications on importations 35. Summary of PDS rate/Tax Code provisions/RR 16-05 provisions 36. BIR Forms 1600 37. Schedule of WVAT payments 38. SAWT (soft copy) t_

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 22 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION Moreover, contrary to the CIR's allegation, CE Casecnan informed him, through its administrative claim for refund filed before the BIR,47 that the enumerated documents are considered as the complete supporting documents, viz: "XXX XXX XXX In compliance with Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 54-2014 issued by the Bureau of Internal Revenue, we are submitting CE Casecnan's documents which are marked "/" in the attached "Annex A" Checklist of Mandatory Requirements for Claims for VAT Credit/Refund. We wish to inform you that these constitute the complete set of documents and schedules of CE Casecnan to support its input VAT cla1m for the first to fourth quarters of calendar year 2013. XXX XXX XXX" The term "complete documents" under Section 112(C) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended, should be understood to refer to those documents that are necessary to support the application for refund or tax credit certificate, as determined by the taxpayer. 48 The BIR examiner can require the taxpayer to submit additional documents but the examiner cannot demand what type of supporting documents should be submitted. 49 Otherwise, the taxpayer will be at the mercy of the examiner, who may require the production of documents that the taxpayer cannot submit. 50 Moreover, it is basic that the CIR ought to know the tax records of all taxpayers. 51 Moreover, the Supreme Court already explained in the case of Pilipinas Total Gas, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal 47 Exhibit "P-6," Dockets, Vol. II, pp. 617-621. 48 CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc., vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA Case No. 8788, May 4, 2016. 49 Ibid. 50 Ibid. 51 Diageo Philippines, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA Case Nos. 7846 and 7865,January 16, 2012. t.

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 23 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION Revenue52 that it is the taxpayer and not the BIR who determines what relevant supporting documents to submit as basis of its claim. Likewise, the question of "when should the submission of documents be deemed 'completed' for purposes of determining the running of the 120-day period" had already been clarified therein, to wit: "xxx for purposes of determining when the supporting documents have been completed - it is the taxpayer who ultimately determines when complete documents have been submitted for purposes of commencing and continuing the running of the 120- dav period. After all, he may have already completed the necessary documents the moment he filed his administrative claim, in which case, the 120-day period is reckoned from the date of filing. XXX XXX XXX Then, except in those instances where the BIR would require additional documents to fully appreciate a claim for tax credit or refund, in terms what additional document must be presented in support of a claim for tax credit or refund- it is the taxpayer who has the right and the burden of providing any and all documents that would support his claim for tax credit or refund. After all, in a claim for tax credit or refund, lL!s the taxpayer who has the burden to prove his cause of action. As such, he enjoys relative freedom to submit such evidence to prove his claim. XXX XXX XXX xxx Besides, as between a taxpayer-applicant, who seeks the refund of his creditable input tax and the CIR, it cannot be denied that the former has greater interest in ensuring that the complete set of documentary evidence is provided for proper evaluation of the State. XXX XXX XXX 52 G.R. No. 207112, December 8, 2015. t_

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 24 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION As explained earlier xxx, taxpayers cannot simply be faulted for failing to submit the complete documents enumerated in RMO No. 53-98, absent notice from a revenue officer or employee that other documents are required. xxx Indeed, a taxpayer's failure with the requirements listed under RMO No. 53-98 is not fatal to its claim for tax credit or refund of excess unutilized excess VAT. This holds especially true when the application for tax credit or refund of excess unutilized excess VAT has arrived at the judicial level. xxx" (Emphases and Italics in the Original; Underlining Supplied.) Considering the foregoing, the 120-day period must be reckoned from November 4, 2014, the date when CE Casecnan filed its administrative claim together with the complete set of supporting documents. Applying the above-mentioned rules to the instant case, CE Casecnan's judicial claim filed on March 11, 2015 is well within the period prescribed by law, to wit: Date of Filing of Administrative Claim and Submission of November 4, 2014 Documents March 4, 2015 End of the 120-day period for the BIR Commissioner to decide April 3, 2015 on the claim March 11, 2015 End of the 30-day period from the expiration of the 120-day period Date of Filing of the Judicial Claim CE Casecnan having complied with the last requirement, it was also able to comply with the first one. As evidenced by its Certificate of Registration No. OCN 8RC0000049560, 53 CE Casecnan is registered, among others, as a VAT taxpayer. As to the existence of zero-rated sales, this Court has already ruled in previous cases54 involving the same parties 53 Exhibit "P-3," Dockets, Vol. II, p. 537. 54 CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA Case No. 8620, September 16, 2014; CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA Case No. 8446, December 16, 2013; CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. t

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 25 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION and issues but different taxable periods, that petitioner's sale of electricity to NIA is zero-rated for VAT purposes. The governing law is Section 108(8)(7) of the NIRC of 1997, as amended by RA No. 9337, and implemented by Section 4.108-S(b)(7) of Revenue Regulations No. 16-2005, which are all quoted below for easy reference: "SEC. 108. Value-added Tax on Sale of Services and Use or Lease of Properties. - XXX XXX XXX (B) Transactions Subject to Zero Percent (Oo/o) Rate.- The following services performed in the Philippines byVAT- registered persons shall be subject to zero percent (0�/o) rate: XXX XXX XXX (7) Sale of power or fuel generated through renewable sources of energy such as, but not limited to,. biomass, solar, wind, hydropower, geothermal, ocean energy, and other emerging energy sources using technologies such as fuel cells and hydrogen fuels." "SECTION 4.108-5. Zero-Rated Sale of Services. XXX XXX XXX (b) Transaction Subject to Zero Percent (0�/o) VAT Rate. - The following services performed in the Philippines by Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA Case No. 8245, May 10, 2013; CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA case Nos. 8041 and 8111, September 11, 2012; CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, CTA case Nos. 8041 and 8788, May 4, 2016. t

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 26 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION VAT-registered persons shall be subject to zero percent (0�/o) VAT rate: XXX XXX XXX (7) Sale of power or fuel generated through renewable sources of energy such as, but not limited to, biomass, solar, wind, hydropower, geothermal and steam, ocean energy, and other emerging sources using technologies such as fuel cells and hydrogen fuels; Provided however, that zero-rating shall apply strictly to the sale of power or fuel generated through renewable sources of energy, and shall not extend to the sale of services related to the maintenance or operation of plants generating said power.~~ Corollary to the above provisions, Section 4.108-3(f) of RR No. 16-2005 states: 11 SECTION 4.108-3. Definitions and Specific Rules on Selected Services. - XXX XXX XXX (f) Sale of electricity by generation, transmission, and distribution companies shall be subject to 10�/o VAT on their gross receipts: Provided, That sale of power or fuel generated through renewable sources of energy such as, but not limited to, biomass, solar, wind, hydropower, geothermal, ocean energy, and other emerging sources using technologies such as fuel cells and hydrogen fuels shall be subject to 0�/o VAT. 'Generation companies' refers to persons or entities authorized by the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) to operate facilities used in the t.

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 27 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION generation of electricity. For this purpose, generation of electricity refers to the production of electricity by a generation company or a co-generation facility pursuant to the provisions of the R.A. No. 9136 (EPIRA). They shall include all Independent Power Producers (IPPs) and NPC/Power Sector Assets and Liabilities Management Corporation (PSALM)-owned generation facilities." Clearly, the sale of power generated through renewable sources of energy is subject to zero percent (0�/o) VAT. Same as in the previous cases, CE Casecnan proved in the instant case that (a) its 140-megawatt hydro-electric power plant project has been accredited by the DOE as a Private Sector Generation Facility (PSGF) under the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Executive Order No. 215, as amended; 55 (b) the ERC has issued Certificate of Compliance No. 10-06-GNS-10701 for its generation facility; 56 and (c) it generates power through its hydro- electric power plant and subsequently sells it only to NIA in accordance with the Amended and Restated Casecnan Project Agreement dated June 26, 1995.57 Thus, petitioner has sufficiently established that it is in the business of power generation and sold the corresponding generated power to NIA as VAT zero-rated sales. For the four (4) taxable quarters of CY 2013, the receipts of P2, 765,134,894.69 were derived from the sales of power generation services to NIA, declared by CE Casecnan in its Quarterly VAT Returns as zero-rated sales and were evidenced by official receipts pre-printed with words "zero-rated," detailed as follows: Exhibit OR OR Date OR Amount Exchange OR Amount (In Peso) P-21-1 Number (In US$) Rate P-21-3 First Quarter P-21-4 0655 25-Jan-13 2 971,752.00 40.40 122 508 960.00 P-21-6 0656 28-Feb-13 2 971,752.00 40.45 122,660 580.00 Sub-Total 0657 28-Feb-13 522,485.52 40.45 0658 27-Mar-13 2 971 752.00 40.80 21,565 856.42 123,721 920.00 390,457,316.42 55 Exhibit "P-2," Dockets, Vol. II, p. 536. 56 Exhibit "P-5," Dockets, Vol. II, p. 613. 57 Exhibit "P-4," Dockets, Vol. II, pp. 538-612. L

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 28 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION 124,480 020.00 125,692 980.00 Second Quarter 130,999 680.00 381,172 680.00 P-21-8 0659 25-Apr-13 2 971 752.00 41.05 2,971 752.00 41.45 130,696 440.00 P-21-10 0660 24-May-13 2 971 752.00 43.20 133,425 600.00 P-21-12 0661 26-Jun-13 2,971 752.00 43.10 58,094 243.68 2,971 752.00 44.00 130,999 680.00 Sub-Total 1 293 917.25 44.00 360,854 977.97 2,971 752.00 43.20 814,070 941.65 Third Quarter 8,186 062.00 43.20 129,938 340.00 P-21-14 1001 26-Jul-13 2,971 752.00 42.85 308 098 901.91 7,046 369.29 42.85 131,909 400.00 P-21-16 1002 27-Aug-13 2,971 752.00 43.50 297,207 760.05 6,695 715.05 43.50 133,728 840.00 P-21-17 1003 27-Aug-13 2,971 752.00 44.10 178,550 714.66 3,967 793.66 44.10 1 179 433 956.62 P-21-19 1004 26-Sep-13 2 765 134,894.69 P-21-20 1005 26-Sep-13 Sub-Total Fourth Quarter P-21-22 1006 25-0ct-13 P-21-23 1007 25-0ct-13 P-21-25 1008 29-Nov-13 P-21-26 1009 29-Nov-13 P-21-28 1010 26-Dec-13 P-21-29 1011 26-Dec-13 Sub-Total Total Zero-Rated Sales As such, petitioner's receipts/collections from its zero- rated sales of electricity generated through a renewable source of energy, particularly, hydropower, are fully substantiated. CE Casecnan declared in its amended quarterly VAT returns for CY 2013 its sales subject to 12�/o VAT, in the amount of P2,503,597,737.86, and supported by the invoices and official receipts examined, 58 and the total sales subject to 12�/o VAT for CY 2013 were all gross receipts from sale of scrap materials and water delivery fees. For CY 2013, CE Casecnan reported a total amount of P25,236,415. 78 input VAT arising from its purchases of capital goods as well as non-capital goods and importation of goods, domestic purchases of services, and services rendered by non-residents. Out of unutilized input VAT, the amount of P22,944,645. 77 is attributable to zero-rated sales, of which P15,142,641.11 was eventually refunded by the BIR. The remaining P7,757,468.99 is now the subject of this judicial refund. Records show that the unutilized input VAT of CE Casecnan was properly substantiated and allocable to valid 58 Exhibits "P-22-1" to "P-22-49," Formal Offer of Evidence of CE Casecnan Water & Energy Inc., Folder 1 of 2. c.

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 29 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION zero-rated sales net of the portion applied to output VAT. Thus: Particulars Energy Fees Water Delivery Miscellaneous Total {Zero-rated} Fees Fees p 300 431,728.55 Total Output VAT P- {120/o VAT} {120/o VAT} p 300 295 790.29 p 135 938.26 Less: Tax Credits/payments: Input VAT allocated 23,071,957.49 22,155,831.76 8,626.53 45,236,415.78 from current purchases VAT withheld on sales - 125,123,246.15 - 125,123,246.15 to Government Input Tax on Sale to - 153,016,712.59 - 153,016,712.59 Government closed 323 376 374.52 (P 22,944,645.77) to Income p 22,944,645.77 Total 23 071 957.49 300 295 790.50 8 626.53 15,142,641.11 44 535.67 VAT Payable (P23,071,957.49) (P 0.21) p 127,311.73 p 7,757,468.99 (Overpayment) 242,913.86 Total unutilized and excess input VAT applied for refund in the original Petition 7,644.77 for Review p 7,506,910.36 Less: Input VAT refunded as evidenced by TDM No. 121-15-00087 Unsupported Input VAT Total unutilized and excess input VAT applied for refund in the Supplemental Petition for Review Less: Not properly substantiated input VAT: Input VAT on domestic purchase of services directly related to construction-in- progress posted twice on the schedule of input VAT Over-application of amortization of input VAT on capital goods Total properly substantiated input VAT allocable to valid zero-rated sales The whole amount of P22,944,645. 77 being claimed by CE Casecnan was applied for refund on the 4th quarter for CY 2013, 59 and was not carried over to the succeeding periods, from 1st quarter of CY 2014 to the 4th quarter of CY 2015. 60 Thus, no amount of input VAT was utilized or applied against output VAT liabilities on the succeeding periods. Also, the input VAT withheld on sales to the Government amounting to P 125,123,246.15 that was claimed as tax credit by CE Casecnan are properly supported by certificates of final VAT withheld at source (BIR Form No. 2306) 61 issued by NIA. 59 Exhibit "P-14," Dockets, Vol. II, pp. 651-658. 60 Exhibits "P-29-1" to "P-29-4" and "P-30-1" to "P-30-4," Formal Offer of Evidence of CE Casecnan Water & Energy Inc., Folder 2 of 2. 61 Exhibits "P-36-1" to "P-36-12," Formal Offer of Evidence of CE Casecnan Water & Energy Inc., Folder 2 of 2. t.

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 30 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION As mentioned earlier, the BIR disallowed unutilized input VAT amounting to P 6,651,205.10 from purchases of goods, services and importations and classified these items as capital goods not subject to refund. First, based on the findings of Commissioner Mr. Emmanuel Y. Mendoza, in his !CPA Report, 62 out of the amount of P12,930,997.34 pertaining to the total unutilized input VAT with respect to the input VAT reclassified by the CIR as input VAT from purchase of capital goods, as indicated in the schedule of input VAT63 submitted by CE Casecnan, only the amount of P12,526, 772.64 was fully substantiated. This issue is not new. In the case of Northwind Power Development Corporation vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the Court's Second Division ruled that the input VAT reclassified by the CIR as input VAT from purchase of capital goods therein, such pertain actually to the periodic payments for the turnkey supply of distribution lines and considered instead as purchase of services for purposes of claiming input tax pursuant to Section 4.110-364 of RR No. 62 Annexes "B-1" to "B-4" of the ICPA Report. 63 Exhibit "P-34," Formal Offer of Evidence of CE Casecnan Water & Energy Inc., Folder 2 of 2. 64 SEC. 4.110-3. Claim for Input Tax on Depreciable Goods.-- Where a VAT-registered person purchases or imports capital goods, which are depreciable assets for income tax purposes, the aggregate acquisition cost of which (exclusive of VAT) in a calendar month exceeds One Million pesos (P1,000,000.00), regardless of the acquisition cost of each capital good, shall be claimed as credit against output tax in the following manner: (a) If the estimated useful life of a capital good is five (5) years or more - The input tax shall be spread evenly over a period of sixty (60) months and the claim for input tax credit will commence in the calendar month when the capital good is acquired. The total input taxes on purchases or importations of this type of capital goods shall be divided by 60 and the quotient will be the amount to be claimed monthly. (b) If the estimated useful life of a capital good is less than five (5) years -The input tax shall be spread evenly on a monthly basis by dividing the input tax by the actual number of months comprising the estimated useful life of a capital good. The claim for input tax credit shall commence in the month that the capital goods were acquired. Where the aggregate acquisition cost (exclusive of VAT) of the existing or finished depreciable capital goods purchased or imported during any calendar month does not exceed one million pesos (P1,000,000.00), the total input t

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 31 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION 16-2005 as amended by Revenue Regulation (RR) No. 4- 2007.65 In this instant case, part of the input VAT reclassified as capital goods are actually domestic purchases of services supported by VAT ORs and VAT invoices66 for CY 2013, in the total amount of P5,579,539. 79. Also, part of the unutilized input VAT actually pertains to payments for construction in progress and that the invoices, official receipts and general ledger of CE Casecnan taxes will be allowable as credit against output tax in the month of acquisition. Capital goods or properties refers to goods or properties with estimated useful life greater than one (1) year and which are treated as depreciable assets under Sec. 34(F) of the Tax Code, used directly or indirectly in the production or sale of taxable goods or services. The aggregate acquisition cost of depreciable assets in any calendar month refers to the total price, excluding the VAT, agreed upon for one or more assets acquired and not on the payments actually made during the calendar month. Thus, an asset acquired on installment for an acquisition cost of more than P1,000,000.00, excluding the VAT, will be subject to the amortization of input tax despite the fact that the monthly payments/installments may not exceed P1,000,000.00. XXX XXX XXX Construction in progress (CIP) is the cost of construction work which is not yet completed. CIP is not depreciated until the asset is placed in service. Normally, upon completion, a CIP item is reclassified and the reclassified asset is capitalized and depreciated. CIP is considered, for purposes of claiming input tax, as a purchase of service, the value of which shall be determined based on the progress billings. Until such time the construction has been completed, it will not qualify as capital goods as herein defined, in which case, input tax credit on such transaction can be recognized in the month the payment was made; Provided, that an official receipt of payment has been issued based on the progress billings. In case of contract for the sale of service where only the labor will be supplied by the contractor and the materials will be purchased by the contractee from other suppliers, input tax credit on the labor contracted shall still be recognized on the month the payment was made based on a progress billings while input tax on the purchase of materials shall be recognized at the time the materials were purchased. Once the input tax has already been claimed while the construction is still in progress, no additional input tax can be claimed upon completion of the asset when it has been reclassified as a depreciable capital asset and depreciated. 65 Amending Certain Provisions of Revenue Regulations No. 16-2005, As Amended, Otherwise Known as the Consolidated Value-Added Tax Regulations of 2005. 66 Exhibits "P-23-1A" to "P-23-198," Formal Offer of Evidence of CE Casecnan Water & Energy Inc., Folder 1 of 2. t

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 32 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION indicate that these transactions are classified into the following categories: 1. Payments for monthly maintenance of access roads; 2. Payments for Power Plant maintenance; 3. Installment payments for improvements on Warehouse, Access Roads, Power Plant, Office and Buildings booked initially as Constructions-in- Progress and subsequently closed to the account under Property, Plant and Equipment subject to depreciation; 4. Payments for installation, inspection and testing of parts of Power Plant; and 5. Payments for consumable parts of Power Plant. Section 4 of RR 16-2005 as amended by R.R. No. 4- 2007 states that payments for construction in progress shall be considered purchase of services for purposes of claiming input tax, to wit: "SECTION 16. Input Tax on Depreciable Goods. Sec. 4.110-3 of RR No. 16-2005 is hereby amended to read as follow: SEC. 4.110-3 Claim for Input Tax on Depreciable Goods. - ... (a) Construction in Progress (CIP) is the cost of construction work which is not yet completed. CIP is not depreciated until the asset is placed in service. Normally, upon completion, a CIP item is reclassified and the reclassified asset is capitalized and depreciated. CIP is considered, for purposes of claiming input tax, as a purchase of service, the l

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 33 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION value of which shall be determined based on the progressed billings. Until such time the construction has been completed, it will not qualify as capital goods as herein defined, in which case, input tax credit in such transaction can be recognized in the month the payment was made; Provided, that an official receipt of payment has been issued based on progressed billings. Once the input tax has already been claimed while the construction is still in progress, no additional input tax can be claimed upon completion of the asset when it has been reclassified as depreciable capital asset and depreciated." (Underlining Supplied.) Under Section 4.110-3 of Revenue Regulations RR No. 16-2005, as amended by RR No. 04-2007, construction in progress may be considered for purposes of claiming input tax as a purchase of service, the value of which shall be determined on the progress billings. Thus, Commissioner Mr. Emmanuel Y. Mendoza, in his !CPA Report, 67 took note of the complete progress billings initially charged to CIPs and the subsequent reclassification entries made by CE Casecnan upon completion to depreciable asset. As verified in the general ledger68 of depreciable assets, the input tax claimed during the construction of the asset was not capitalized as part of the depreciable asset's total cost in the books of CE Casecnan. Thus: Exh OR No. OR Date Invoice Item Description VAT (A) VAT on For Refund Nos. No. Cash (A+B) Retention (B) P-24-1A 0718 14-Feb-13 0700 Installation of sprinkler 40,178.57 - 40,178.57 2-Aug-13 0786 system to G 2501 67 Note S(a), p. 11. 68 Exhibits "P-24-lC, F, G", "P-24-3C,F,G," "P-24-4C,D,G,H,I,J," "P-24-SC,F,I,J," "P- 24-6C,F,G," "P-24-6C,F,G," "P-24-7C,F,G," "P-24-7C,F,G," "P-24-SC,F,G" L

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 34 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION P-24-2A 0663 27-Dec-12 0881 Repainting of tailrace 79,350.68 3,400.74 82,751.42 to G 0741 14-Feb-13 0887 P-24-3A 0661 25-0ct-12 0878 building to G 0665 21-Feb-13 0886 P-24-4A 0743 22-Mar-13 0894 Road Improvement 488,858.58 20,951.08 509,809.66 to J 0747 02-Aug-13 0913 Building renovation of 163,996.90 (16,399.69) 147,597.21 1020 project, office upgrading 382,659.42 16,399.99 399,059.11 1049 project, and additional P-24-5A 2167 22-Mar-12 1060 works 411,744.38 - 411,744.38 to J 2193 21-Jun-12 0017 Installation of monorail 2249 24-Jan-13 0147 crane P-24-6A 1605 07-Dec-12 to G 1690 25-Apr-13 0018 Motorpool & workshop 222,281.74 9,526.36 231,808.09 0510 0502 upgrade and space 110,786.37 0515 34,650.23 installation 80,850.54 0505 18,964.83 P-24-7A 1606 07-Dec-12 0511 Construction of Pauan 8,668.33 4,747.99 115,534.36 to G 1691 25-Apr-13 0504 20,226.11 P-24-8A 1733 0518 warehouse Satellite No. 2 to G 003533 27-Jun-13 06-Dec-13 Repainting of (3,465.02) 31,185.21 3,465.02 3,465.02 miscellaneous structure at Pauan P-24-9A 1734 27-Jun-13 Repainting of railings & (1,896.48) 17,068.34 to G 003506 13-Sep-13 P-24- 1735 27-Jun-13 monorail crane structures lOA to 003525 14-Nov-13 G Repainting of warehouse (866.83) 7,801.50 P-24- 0172 29-Apr-13 866.83 866.83 11A to 0176 20-Jun-13 flooring & concrete wall G P-24- 65218 30-Apr-13 1830 Mitigation of diminished 329,899.92 (32,989.99) 296,909.93 12A to 64904 28-Feb-13 1831 Casecnan intake riverbed 769,766.49 32,989.99 802,756.48 M 66144 15-Aug-13 phase 1 547,440.27 67006 29-Nov-13 1030338 SES Excilation 394,748.06 - 547,440.27 P-24- 2166 22-Mar-12 1029894 404,224.70 13A to J 2095 14-Jun-12 1031353 Supply & installation of 228,650.62 - 394,748.06 2314 05-Jul-13 1031963 trash rack cleaning P-24- 1352 08-Nov-13 1019 machine 166,209.84 - 404,224.70 14A to J 1267 14-Aug-14 1050 Office upgrading & 1453 23-Jul-15 1061 building improvement 267,817.21 - 228,650.62 P-24- 1356 13-Dec-13 1253 15A to 1262 25-Apr-14 1291 Road improvement (16,620.98) 149,588.86 G 1326 TOTAL 1261 (26,781.72) 241,035.49 1278 5,064,224.12 Also, a part of the said reclassified input VAT as purchases of capital goods is the amount of input VAT on importation of goods that are supported by BOC Single Administrative Document (SAD) and settlement of duties and taxes evidencing actual payment of VAT in the amount of P1,205,568.00. 69 However, the amount of P404,224. 70 was not properly substantiated as the domestic purchase of services from Siemen's Inc. 70 that is directly related to CIPs was posted twice in the schedule of input VAT. Thus, out of the amount of P6,651,205.10 being claimed by CE Casecnan for input 69 Exhibits "P-26-1" to "P-26-6", Formal Offer of Evidence of CE Casecnan Water & Energy Inc., Folder 1 of 2. 70 Exhibits "P-24-12J" and "P-24-12K", Formal Offer of Evidence of CE Casecnan Water & Energy Inc., Folder 1 of 2. ~

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 35 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION VAT on local purchases of non-capital goods and services and on importations of non-capital goods reclassified as capital goods exceeding P 1 million, only the amount of P6,408,291.25 shall be allowed for refund, to wit: Findings Exhibit No. Total Input Ratio of Input VAT VAT zero-related Attributable sales to Total to Zero-rated Sales Sales Domestic purchases of services supported by VAT ORs and VAT Invoices 1st QTR P-23-1A to P-23-28 185 890.16 38.74% 72,008.76 2nd QTR P-23-3A to P-23-78 1 659 608.71 41.33% 685 841.25 3rd QTR P-23-8A to P-23-128 2 471 475.90 59.17% 1 462 447.42 4th QTR P-23-13A to P-23- 1,262,565.02 60.09% 758,722.93 198 Subtotal 5,579,539. 79 2,979,020.36 Domestic purchases of services directly related to CIPs supported by VAT ORs and/or VAT invoice progress billings 1st QTR P-24-1A to P-24-5H 1,192 081.24 38.74% 461 779.64 2nd QTR P-24-60 to P-24-128 2,050 504.18 41.33% 847 380.67 3rd QTR P-24-13G & P-24- 1,022,457. 79 59.17% 605,019.36 13H, P-24-4E & P-24- 4F, P-24-12G & P-24- 12H 4th QTR P-24-100 to P-24- 799,180.90 60.09% 480,257.94 12K Subtotal 5_~06~224.12 2139~437.61 Input VAT on domestic p_urchases of goods supported by VAT invoices 3rd QTR P-25 677,440.73 59.17% 400,862.27 TOTAL 5,774,320.24 For amortization of input VAT on capital goods exceeding P1 million for CY 2013, the capital assets presented by CE Casecnan71 were traced to the schedule of capitalizable assets72 prepared by it and were treated as depreciable assets with an estimated useful life of greater than one (1) year. The amortizations are in order and properly substantiated by VAT invoices73 except for over- application of amortization of input tax presented as follows: Supplier's Name Exhibit Invoice Over Amortization of Input No. No. Sim Computer Sales Tax Western Marketinq Corporation P-27-4 20526 Fuji Xerox Philippines Inc. P-27-6 053440 Month Amount Sim Computer Sales P-27-7 337739 P-27-8 21592 January 3,855.05 May 933.93 Ma_y 2_1_904.88 June 925.00 ~-�---- 71 Exhibits "P-27-1" to "P-27-70", Formal Offer of Evidence of CE Casecnan Water & Energy Inc., Folder 1 of 2. 72 Exhibit "P-37," Formal Offer of Evidence of CE Casecnan Water & Energy Inc., Folder 2 of 2. 73 Exhibits "P-27-1" to "P-27-70", Formal Offer of Evidence of CE Casecnan Water & Energy Inc., Folder 2 of 2. {,

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 36 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION Sim Computer Sales P-27-9 21755 June 2,345.03 Advance Microsvstems Corg. P-27-12 39170 Jul'{ 58.83 Trends and Technologies Inc. P-27-13 31753 October 5 289.85 TOTAL 16,312.57 Thus, out of P635,855.07 being refunded by CE Casecnan as amortization of input VAT on capital goods exceeding P1 million for CY 2013, only the amount of P628,210.30 shall be refunded, thus: Findings Exhibit No. Total Input Ratio of zero- Input VAT VAT related sales Attributable to Total Sales to Zero-rated Sales Amortized Input VAT on domestic purchases of capital goods supported by VAT invoices 1st QTR P-27-1 to P-27-56 294,780.94 38.74% 114 190.07 2nd QTR P-27-1 to P-27-64 309 857.14 41.33% 128 049.95 3rd QTR P-27-1 to P-27-66 325 748.06 59.17% 192,755.03 4th QTR P-27-1 to P-27-70 321 522.93 60.09% 193 215.25 TOTAL 1,251_L909.07 628,210.30 As to the issue that the input VAT was actually paid to the Bureau of Customs, Sections 112(C) and (D) of the NIRC of 1997 states: "XXX XXX XXX (C) Period within which Refund or Tax Credit or Input Taxes shall be Made. In proper cases, the Commissioner shall grant a refund or issue the tax credit certificate for creditable input taxes within one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of submission of complete documents in support of the application filed in accordance with Subsection (A) hereof. XXX XXX XXX (D) Manner of Giving Refund. Refund shall be made upon warrants drawn by the Commissioner or by his duly authorized representative without the necessity of being countersigned by the Chairman, Commission an Audit, the provisions of the Administrative Code of 1987 to the contrary notwithstanding: Provided, that refunds under this t.

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 37 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION paragraph shall be subject to post audit by the Commission on Audit." (Underlinings supplied.) However, Customs Memorandum Order No. 28-2014 issued by the Bureau of Customs specifically states therein: "II. Coverage These rules shall cover all claims for refund on input VAT on importations attributable to zero-rated transactions under Section 112 of the NIRC, as amended. III. Operational Provisions A. Upon receipt of the docket from the BIR approving the claim of a particular importer for refund of the input VAT on his importation, the Tax Credit Secretariat (TCS) shall check that the following supporting documents are attached to the docket forwarded by the BIR: XXX XXX XXX B. If the supporting documents are found to be complete, the entire docket of the claim shall be endorsed to the Chief, Revenue Accounting Division (RAD) this Bureau for verification of payments of duties and taxes, using Tax Credit or if cash payments, it must have been remitted to the Bureau of Treasury (BTr). XXX XXX XXX D. Upon receipt of the docket from FMO with the corresponding Evaluation Report, the Secretariat shall determine whether the claimant will avail of cash refund or for issuance of TCC. E. The Secretariat shall then prepare the corresponding endorsement for signature of the Commissioner or his duly designated Tax Credit Approving Authority authorizing payment of the cash t-

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 38 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION refund or issuance of Tax Credit Certificate based on the amount computed or recommended by the FMO. The signer resolution/endorsement authorizing payment shall be forwarded to the Accounting Division, FMO for the preparation of cash refund or issuance of TCC. IV. Manner of Payment for Cash Refund XXX XXX XXX F. Within five (5) days from receipt of the Endorsement authorizing payment of the cash refund, the FMO shall prepare the request for issuance of Notice of Allocation (NCA) from the DBM, supported with a certification from BTr that the corresponding amount is available under BOC's trust liabilities account, including the following: 1) Endorsement signed by the Commissioner or his duly designated Tax Credit Approving Authority authorizing payment of the cash refund; 2) Copy of the claimant's application for VAT refund pursuant to Sec. 112 of the NIRC, as amended; 3) BIR endorsement to the BOC containing the BIR's determination of the validity of the claim for the VAT refunds on importation pursuant to Section 112 of the NIRC as amended, with the corresponding Authority for the BOC to issue the refund; 4) Certification of payments issued by RAD; and 5) Computation of the final amount of cash refund as computed by the Accounting Division, FMO. G. Upon receipt of the NCA from the DBM, the Accounting Division, FMO shall prepare the l

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 39 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION Disbursement Voucher and forward the same to the BOC Cashier. xxx xxx xxx" (Underlinings Supplied.) A part of the reclassified input VAT as purchases of capital goods is the amount of input VAT on importation of goods that are supported by BOC Single Administrative Document (SAD) and settlement of duties and taxes evidencing actual payment of VAT in the amount of P1,205,568.00.74 Based on the ratio of zero-related sales to total sales, it will constitute P633,971.01 as part of input VAT attributable to zero-rated sales. Thus: Input VAT on importation of goods supported by BOC single administrative document {SAD) and statement of settlement of duties and taxes evidencing the actual payment of VAT Findings Exhibit No. Total Input Ratio of Input VAT VAT zero-related Attributable sales to Total to Zero-rated Sales Sales 2nd QTR P-26-1 to P-26-4 444 880.00 41.33% 183 848.79 3rd _QTR P-26-5 to P-26-6 760 688.00 59.17% 450 122.21 Subtotal 1,205,568.00 633,971.01 TOTAL 12,526,772.63 6,408,291.25 However, based on the foregoing, although it is the BIR that determines the validity of the claim for VAT refunds on importation pursuant to Section 112 of the NIRC of 1997, ultimately, it is the BOC who will issue the cash refund or tax credit certificate to the taxpayer. Since in the instant case, the Commissioner or the Bureau of Customs was not impleaded as a party to the claim for refund of CE Casecnan, this Court does not acquire jurisdiction over the former. Consequently, this Court cannot order the Commissioner or the Bureau of Customs to refund or issue a tax credit certificate with respect to the amount of P470,408.82 representing the input VAT paid to the BOC on importations, which were excluded in the authority to issue VAT credit/refund but were excluded in the tax credit certificate issued, as well as the amount of P633,971.01 with respect to the input VAT on local purchases of non-capital goods and service and on importations of non-capital goods 74 Exhibits "P-26-1" to "P-26-6", Formal Offer of Evidence of CE Casecnan Water & Energy Inc., Folder 1 of 2. t.

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 40 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION reclassified as purchases of capital goods exceeding P 1 million, but supported by BOC SAD and statement of settlement of duties and taxes evidencing actual payment of VAT. Thus, out of the total unutilized input VAT of P7, 757,468.99 being claimed for refund, it is ascertained that only P6,402,530.48 is proper for refund. Thus: Particulars Input VAT Input VAT on local purchases of non-capital goods and Attributable to services and on importations of non-capital goods reclassified as purchases of capital goods exceeding P 1 Zero-rated Sales million, excluding the amount of input VAT on importation of goods supported by BOC SAD and statement of settlement of p 5,774,320.24 duties and taxes evidencing the actual payment of VAT. Amortization of input VAT on capital goods exceeding P1 628,210.30 million for CY 2013 p 6,402,530.54 TOTAL WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Petition for Review with Supplemental Petition for Review filed by CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company on March 12, 2015 and June 11, 2015, respectively, are hereby PARTIALLY GRANTED. Accordingly, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is ORDERED TO REFUND or TO ISSUE A TAX CREDIT CERTIFICATE in favor of CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. in the amount of P6,402,530.48, representing its unutilized excess input VAT attributable to its zero-rated sales for the four quarters of calendar year 2013. SO ORDERED. CJ1it. N. M'"-~ . C~ WE CONCUR: CIELITO N. MINDARO-GRULLA Associate Justice Presiding Justice AEsRs~~~~P�u.stUicYe

CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. vs. CIR Page 41 of 41 CTA Case No. 9006 DECISION CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Article VIII, Section 13 of the Constitution, it is hereby certified that the conclusions in the above Decision were reached in consultation before the case was assigned to the writer of the opinion of the Court's Division. Chairperson, Special 1st Division