BIR Ruling No. 489-2020
18 BUREAU OF INTERCAL REVENUE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
27(D(5); 39(A1,RR 7-2003 BIR Ruling No.014-03 BIR Ruling No. 634-17; BIR Ruling No.187-17 BIR Ruling No.480-17 0T-089-2020 SEP 0 7 2020
Unit 5b 5th Floor, Universal Re Building Legaspi Village, Makati City PILAR GAVIOLA AND COMPANY 106 Paseo de Roxas cor. Perea Street,
Attention: Gilbert H. Pilar
Gentleman:
Cojuangco Jr. and Sons Enterprises, Inc. ("ECJSEI" for brevity), for confirmation that the sale of real properties held by ECJSEI for investment purposes is subject to the 6% capital gains tax under Section 27(D)(5) and documentary stamp tax under Section 196, both of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended. but is not subject to value-added tax (VAT). This refers to your letter dated June 15, 2020 requesting on behalf of your client, Eduardo
Unit E 5/F, Universal-Re Building, 106 Paseo de Roxas corner Perea St., Legaspi Village, Makati City. It is duly registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 23, 1973. It is also registered with the BIR on June 28, 1994 with TIN Financial Holding Company with PSIC Code 6694. It is represented that ECJSEI is a domestic corporation with principal place of business at under Line of Business of
personal property of every kind and description, including shares of stock, subscriptions, bond, and own, hold, use, sell, assign, transfer, mortgage, pledge, exchange, or otherwise dispose of real and debentures, notes, evidences of indebtedness, and other securities or obligations of any person, corporation or association, domestic or foreign; to receive, collect and dispose of interest, dividends, powers, and privileges of ownership, including all voting powers of any stock so owned; provided it and income arising from such property; and to possess and exercise in respect thereof all the rights, It is organized as a holding company and its primary purpose is to invest in, purchase or acquire
will not engage or act as broker or dealer of securities.
hold itself out in public as engaged in buying and selling of real estate properties. From the time of its As a financial holding company, ECJSEI did not engage in real estate business nor advertise or
lease in the ordinary course of business.' The ten (10) parcels of land ("subject real properties" for brevity) are covered by the following Transfer Certificates of Title (TCT) No. with their corresponding incorporation, ECJSEI purchased ten (10) parcels of land for investment purposes and not for sale or
area and location:
TCT No. AREA (in square LOCATION
meters) Brgy. Mandalagan, Bacolod City
Brgy. Mandalagan, Bacolod City
O
0T-0489-2020
SEP 0 7 2020
Brgy.Mandalagan,Bacolod City Brgy.Mandalagan,Bacolod City Brgy.Mandalagan,Bacolod City Brgy.Mandalagan Bacolod City Brgy. Mandalagan, Bacolod City
St. Vincent Village, Brgy. Tangub, Bacolod City St. Vincent Village, Brgy. Tangub, Bacolod City Purok Santol, Brgy. Mandalagan, Bacolod City
investment and capital appreciation. To prove the non-use of the subject real properties, the concerned Barangay issued a certification stating such fact. Also, the concerned Office of the City Assessor issued a Certification for Land with No Improvement stating that "there is no building or any improvement its operations.It has been reported in the Audited Financial Statements (AFS) of ECJSEI as "Investment Properties". As disclosed in Note 9 (d) of the AFS, these lots were being held mainly for introduced on the aforementioned lot". Since its acquisition, the subject real properties were not developed nor utilized by ECJSEI in
of land' located at Brgy. Mandalagan, Bacolod City in favor of SGOC Holdings Corporation. On the Corporation over two (2) adjacent parcels of land2 located at St. Vincent Village, Brgy. Tangub. Bacolod City. On April 17, 2020, ECJSEI again executed a Deed of Absolute Sale in favor of Radyo same date, another Deed of Absolute Sale was executed by ECJSEI in favor of LOCC Holdings On March 9, 2020, ECJSEI executed a Deed of Absolute Sale over seven (7) adjacent parcels
Pilipino Corporation over a parcel of land3 located at Purok Santol, Brgy. Mandalagan, Bacolod City The corresponding taxes due on the sale of the said properties were already paid. Hence, this query on whether or not the subject real properties owned by ECJSEI for investment and capital appreciation purposes are considered capital assets.
In reply, please be informed that the term "capital asset" as negatively defined in Section 39(A)(1) of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended, means property held by the taxpayer (whether or not connected with his trade or business), but does not include stock in trade of the taxpayer or other property of a kind which would properly be included in the inventory of the taxpayer if on hand at the close of the taxable year, or property held by the taxpayer primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of his trade or business, or property used in the trade or business, of a character which is subject to the allowance for depreciation provided in Subsection (F) of Section 34, or real property used in trade or business of the taxpayer.
An idle property may be classified as capital or ordinary asset. Revenue Regulations (RR) No
7-2003, particularly Section 3(e) thereof, provides to wit:
"SEC. 3. GUIDELINES IN DETERMINING WHETHER A PARTICULAR REAL PROPERTY IS A CAPITAL ASSET OR ORDINARY ASSET.
XXX XXX XXX
Treatment of abandoned and idle real properties. - Real properties formerly forming
part of the stock in trade of a taxpayer engaged in the real estate business, or
1 TCT No. (T
2 TCT No. 3 TCT NO. ( and
0T-0489-2020
formerly being used in the trade or business of a taxpayer engaged or not engaged continue to be treated as ordinary assets. Real property initially acquired by a in the real estate business, which were later on abandoned and became idle, shall taxpayer engaged in the real estate business shall not result in its conversion into a capital asset even if the same is subsequently abandoned or becomes idle. SEP 0 7 2020
properties. (Emphasis supplied) showing of proof that the same have not been used in business for more than two (2) years prior to the consummation of the taxable transactions involving said Provided however, that properties classified as ordinary assets for being used in business by a taxpayer engaged in business other than real estate business as defined in Section 2(g) hereof are automatically converted into capital assets upon
years prior to the consummation of the taxable transaction involving said properties. The automatic the idle real property is considered capital asset from the moment it was acquired. The subject real capital asset upon showing of proof that the same has not been used in business for more than two (2) conversion of property into capital asset provided in RR No. 7-2003, however, is not necessary when properties were acquired for investment purposes and recorded/reported by ECJSEI as capital assets. The properties were never used in the course of trade or business of ECJSEI, or depreciated for that purposes. No improvements were introduced to the subject real properties as certified by the concerned business, it did not operate from the time it was incorporated and thus, it has no income-generating City Assessor where the properties are located. The concerned Barangay also issued a Certification of Non-Use of the subject real properties. More importantly, ECJSEI is not engaged in the real estate Based on the above, an idle property classified as ordinary asset is automatically converted into
activity.
In view of the foregoing, and considering that ECJSEI is a taxpayer not engaged in the real estate business, being not a real estate dealer, developer or lessor and was organized as a holding company; that the aforementioned properties have been idle and vacant since the time of its acquisition as shown, by the Certifications of the concerned City Assessor; that there are no improvements erected]
on the land as well as the Certification of concerned Barangay Chairman where the properties are located that the properties have no reported operation or commercial activity; and that the properties have been treated in the books of accounts and are reflected in the audited financial statement as investment properties and have not been used in the ordinary course of trade or business, it is the
considered opinion of this Office that the subject real properties described above are classified as capital assets, the conveyance of which is subject to capital gains tax and documentary stamp tax but not subject to VAT and creditable withholding tax. (BIR Ruling Nos. 187-2017 dated April 17, 2017; 634-2017
dated December 19, 2017 and 480-2017 dated October 18, 2017)
This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon
investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be considered null
and void.
Very truly yours,
a
CAESAR R. DULAY Commissioner of Internal Revenue
036597 Q
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.