BIR Ruling No. 261-2017

REPUBLICOF THE PHILIPPINES

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Quezon City

RA 7279 BIR Ruling No.005-11

#261-2017 5-292017

KAISAHAN VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,INC Bagumbayan, Tanauan City Batangas

Attention: Milagros C. Velasco President

Gentlemen:

This refers to your letter dated June 15, 2016 requesting exemption from the payment of capital gains tax (CGT) relative to the transfer of title of land from Kaisahan Village Homeowners Association, Inc. in favor of its qualified member-beneficiaries pursuant to Republic Act 7279 otherwise known as the "Urban Development and Housing Act of 1992"

Based on the Board Resolution No. 15 series 2016 issued by the Board Members of Kaisahan Village Homeowners Association, Inc. (Kaisahan Village HOA), it is alleged that the parcels of land covered by Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) Nos. T-

to located at Tanauan, Batangas and owned by Kaisahan Village HOA were acquired through a loan under the Community Mortgage Program (CMP), with Carville Homes Construction and Management Services as the Originator; that based on the Certification dated February 2. 2016 issued by the Social Housing Finance Corporation, it was certified that the property of Kaisahan Village HOA located in Kaisahan Village, Bagumbavan. Tanauan, Batangas, was granted a loan under the CMP in the total amount of , with 849 beneficiaries.

In reply, please be informed that the transfer of the subdivided lots in favor of the individual members-beneficiaries of the Association is not subject to either the capital gains tax (CGT) imposed under Section 27 (D)(5) of the Tax Code of 1997, as amended, or the creditable withholding tax (CWT) imposed under Revenue Regulations (RR) No. 2-98, as amended, considering that said transfer is being made without any monetary consideration. The transfer is only a formality to finally effect the transfer of the subject property to its member-beneficiaries who actually bought the same from the former owner through the Association. In other words, the association is merely transferring the ownership of the property to its member-beneficiaries who actually own the same.

Furthermore, the said transfer is not subject to the donor's tax imposed under Section 99 of the Tax Code of 1997, since there is no donative intent on the part of the

1 please see attached Masterlist of Beneficiaries consisting of thirteen (13) pages

2612017 529-2017 Kaisahan Village Homeowners Association, Inc Page 2 of 2

Association to donate the property to its members-beneficiaries, considering that it

could not donate property the ownership of which already belongs to the members-

beneficiaries themselves.

It is noted that under Section 196 of the Tax Code of 1997, the deeds or

documents subject to the documentary stamp tax (DST) imposed therein are those where the realty sold are granted, assigned, transferred, or otherwise conveyed to a purchaser or purchasers or to any other person or persons designated by such purchaser or purchasers, thereby excluding from its purview the instant case considering that the

supposed purchasers are actually the owners thereof. Besides, no consideration is

involved in said transaction upon which the tax imposed could be based. Accordingly the transfer of the subdivided lots in favor of the beneficiaries is not subject to DST

under Section 196 of the Tax Code of 1997.However, the notarial acknowledgment to

the deed of conveyance is subject to the documentary stamp tax of P15.00 pursuant to Section 188 of the Tax Code of 1997.

It is, however, understood that the Certificate Authorizing Registration (CAR) shall only be issued after the submission of the requirements provided under RMO 15. 2003 and after it is established upon proper verification by the Revenue District Officer (RDO) concerned that, considering the rules on valuation on real property, the actual selling price per sale transaction in this case does not exceed P450,000.002 for house and lot and P180,000.00 for lot only for each qualified beneficiaries. (BIR Ruling No 005-11 datedJanuary 19, 2011)

This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However, if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be considered null and void.

0a A Very truly yours.

CAESAR R.DULAY Commissioner of Internal Revenue

8 006770

K-I

2 HUDCC Resolution No. 1, Series of 2013, promulgated on October 16, 2013, approving the adjustment

of price ceiling for horizontal socialized housing from P400,000.00 per house and lot to P450,000.00.