Opinion No. 09-14 RE : Freight Forwarding and Anti-Dummy Law

) l • i'.,: 1 : """i Republic of the Philippines Securities and Exchange Commission SEC Bldg. EDSA, Greenhills, Mandaluyong City 04 June 2009 Royal Cargo Combined Logistics, Inc. SEC Opinion No. 09-14 Royal Cargo Building, Sta. Agueda Ave., Freight Forwarding and Pascor Drive, Paraiiaque Ci,tY " Anti-Dummy Law (. ATTENTION: ._ Atty. Roville C. Sunga Legal Manager SUBJECT Request for Opinion Gentlemen: This refers to your letter-request for opinion dated 24 November 2008, with respect to the application of the nationality requirement and the Anti-Dummy Law to your freight forwarding company. It was provided in SEC -OGC Opinion No. 08-21 dated 29 October 2008 that a freight forwarding corporation is considered an operator of public utility and as such, must comply with Article XII, Section 11 of the Constitution, which provides: "No franchise, 'certificate or any other form of authorization for the operation of a public utility shall be granted except to citizens of the Philippines or to corporations or associations organized under the laws of the Philippines, at least sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens;xxx" ,' This being the case, it naturally follows that the provisions of the Anti-Dummy Law! will also apply. Sect jon 2-A thereof provides: "Section 2-A.Anyperson, corporation, or association which, having in its name or under its control, a right, franchise, privilege, property or business, the exercise or enjoyment of which is expressly reserved by the Constitution or Commonwealth Act No. 108 as amended 1 :'

. /'~ ., • the laws to citizens. of the Philippines or of any other specific country, or to corporations or associations at least sixty per centum of the capital of which is owned by such citizens,txxx in any manner permits or allows any person not possessing the qualifications required bv the Constitution, or existing laws to acquire, use, exploit or enjoy a right, franchise, privileqe, propettv or business, the exercise and enjoyment of which are expresslv reserved bv the Constitution or existing Jaws to citizens of the PhiliRPines or of any other specific country, to intervene in the management operation, administration or control thereof, whetneras an officer,' employee or laborer therein with or without remuneration Xxx who knowingly aids, assist or abets in the planning, consummation or perpetration of any of the acts hereinabove enumerated shall be punished xxx "(underscoring supplied) Clear from the above provision is the prohibition for aliens to "intervene in the management, operation, administration or control" of corporations whose activities are reserved for Filipinos. Thus, a foreigner as president, which was indicated in your letter and substantiated by the attached General Information Sheet, cannot be sustained. However, it is yout( positior{'that your corporation "is not subject to the nationality requiremeht)mp<?sed by law as it is engaged in international freight forwarding. Also, the Ai1~';D'Q.?1t.ny Law finds no application to the present corporate structure and compo~ition~pf:,pf.fkersand directors of [y]our company as the same only applies to partly, natiori~li~ed corporations where the constitution requires that foreign equity ownership~e,;liq:l:~trd." ," , . ! ; I.• .;r In support thereof,~ you cited' the Department of Justice Opinion2 dated 9 November 2004 wherein a detailed review of its issuance was made with the following conclusion, to wit: "After a careful and exhaustive review of the aforecited OpIniOnS, considerations of sound public policy and national interest, side by side with the pertinent constitutional and legal provisions, as well as doctrinal pronouncements on the matter, we revert to our view expressed in our opinion dated September 11, 1946 that the nationality requirement applies only to domestic air commerce and/or air transportation, and does not apply to international air freight forwarders." r .'. , While it is clear ,that the pronouncement made therein is in accordance with the stand you have ta~erj,~:~reading of the Amended Articles of Incorporation3 of Royal Cargo Combined ~~'~is~.F7!'"Inc. shows that you are not covered by the same. --- ---'_.,. ,.1 ;~ : Opinion No. ~8 Series of2004: " ft., Amended ArtIcles as approved on 30JI.1oe2004 2

. • v, Article 2 thereof • provides that the principal purpose for which your corporation was formed is as follows: -::'1 "To engage. in and conduct the business of international and domestic freiilht~(orwarding, transporting, conveying and carrying goods, wares, merchandi~EiCpro9ucts and all kinds of cargoes or freights either by land, sea and air!to.'ar:1~iJpointor place of destination outside the Philippines as may be permitted,and~uthorized by the laws of the Philippines and! or the laws of any for~ign COl,H1~rY, and to undertake and attend to all matters necessary and requisite to 'be done or required by law relative to the business of forwarding and conveyance of goods, wares, merchandise, products and all kinds of cargoesor-freigh,t by any of the means herein before mentioned, to act in their own right 'as''cargo or freight accommodation in land, sea or air carrier, to enter into charter parties for the carriage or transportation of all kinds of cargoes of freight, to act as agent of hotels, and land, sea or air cargoes or freight in and outside the Philippines, and to establish and maintain branches and agencies within and outside the Philippines. Xxx" (Emphasis supplied) Based on the above, your corporation is engaged in both international and domestic freight forwarding business by land, sea or air. In view thereof, there can be no other conclusion but that your corporation is covered by the Constitutional provisipns on the nationality requirements and the prohibition provided in theiAnti+-Dummy ~ Law. ~. _~:.?\ ~,.~~. " .' ~r .1''',: It is understood!jth>~t~th~ foregoing opinion is rendered based solely on the facts and circumstances,'disC/qs'ed in the queries relevant solely to the particular issues raised therein and Shall'~ot be used in the nature of a standing rule binding on the Commission inoth~r i.t~,seswhether similar or dissimilar circumstances. If upon investigation, it 'will.',~,Et)disclosed that the facts relied upon are different, this opinion shall be consider.eqq~f/ilull and void: , : ,! Very truly yours, ~e--- VERNETTE G. UMALI-PACO General Counsel , .j 3