BIR Ruling No. 341-2020

BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE REPUBLICOF THE PHILIPPINES DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Quezon City

0T-0341-2020 Section 6 of RA No. 10752; RMO No. 31-2019 JUN 2 3 2020

Pampanga, Philippines 2009 Department of Transportation Clark Freeport Zone, Apo Court corner Sergio Osmena Street

Attention: Undersecretary for Legal Affairs Atty. Reinier Paul R. Yebra

Gentlemen:

Transportation (DOTr), clarification of the proper valuation of real properties subject of expropriation proceedings. This refers to your letter dated June 5, 2020 requesting on behalf of Department of

two (2) parcels of land covered by Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) Nos. along Quirino Highway, Barangay Greater Lagro, Quezon City, consisting of and TCT No. meters and It is represented that Century Communities Corporation ("Century") is the owner of square meters, respectively.The aforesaid properties are subject of the issued by the Registry of Deeds for Quezon City, both located square

expropriation proceedings filed by the DOTr, through the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), in a complaint dated November 13, 2019.The expropriation case, docketed as Civil Case No. entitled "Republic of the Philippines, represented by the Department of Transportation, vs. Century Communities Corporation and Registry of Deeds of Quezon City", is now pending before the Quezon City Regional Trial Court, Branch 98. The filing of the foregoing expropriation case was prompted by Century's rejection of DOTr's offer to purchase the properties for Php Der square meter. Century maintains that the market

value of the properties should be Php per square meter.

The subject parcels of land were issued Tax Declaration Nos. and by the Office of the City Assessor of Quezon City, classifying them as residential. It is noted, however, that the Department of Finance Department Order No. 026-2019 (DOF DO No. 026-2019) prescribes zonal values only for commercial properties along Quirino Highway, Barangay Greater Lagro, Quezon City. A certification was also issued by RDO 028-Novaliches stating that there is no valuation for residential lands in Quirino Highway, Greater Lagro, Quezon City."

On November 20, 2019, the DOTr, pursuant to the provisions of the Office of the Court Administrator (OCA) Circular No. 113-2019, deposited the amount of Php with the Office of the Clerk of Court of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Quezon City. On

Department of Transportation Page 2 of 4 OT-0341-2020 JUN 2 3 2020

the basis of the deposit made by the DOTr, the court issued the Writ of Possession pursuant to November 25,2019, the DOTr took actual possession of the subject properties and started the Section 6a) of Republic Act (RA) No.10752 entitled An Act Facilitating the Acquisition of Right-of-Way Site or Location for National Government Infrastructure Projects. On construction of the depot for the MRT-7 Project.

2020. Century sought for a reconsideration of the denial, which was again denied in another Omnibus Order dated March 4, 2020. Notwithstanding the issuance of the foregoing Omnibus Orders, Century filed an Omnibus Motion insisting its claim that the value of the Branch 98. Quezon City, but the same was denied in an Omnibus Order dated January 3. Subsequently, Century filed for the quashal of the Writ of Possession issued by RTC

expropriated properties is Php per square meter using as a basis therefor the Bureau

query requesting for clarification on the proper zonal valuation of the properties subject of of Internal Revenue (BIR) Ruling No. OT-0196-2020 dated February 20, 2020. Hence, this expropriation proceedings.

national internal revenue taxes pursuant to Section 6[E] of the 1997 Tax Code, as amended. It was issued for the purpose of determining the tax base in the computation of applicable was issued based on the facts then represented of properties along Quirino Highway, for the purpose of determining the proper valuation or just compensation of properties subject Barangay Greater Lagro, Quezon City, which are classified as commercial. It was not issued of expropriation proceedings, which, to us, is essentially a judicial prerogative.' Neither was it issued to resolve the actual location of the properties vis-a-vis their land classification. In reply, please be informed at the outset that the cited BIR Ruling No. OT-0196-2020

That the properties mentioned in BIR Ruling No. OT-0196-2020 are subject of a

facts as represented by the requesting party in that Ruling. Be that as it may, we confirm that pending expropriation case before the court is an entirely new fact. This was not part of the

in expropriation proceedings filed by the government to acquire real property for the right-of-

Republic Act (RA) No. 10752 providing for the guidelines in determining the proper zonal way site or location for any national government infrastructure, the provisions of Section 6 of valuation of real properties upon which the required deposit shall be made, are controlling. Pertinent portion of Section 6 reads:

national government infrastructure through expropriation, the appropriate necessary to acquire real property for the right-of-way site or location for any the Government Corporate Counsel, or their deputized government or private legal counsel, shall immediately initiate the expropriation proceedings before implementing agency, through the Office of the Solicitor General, the Office of "SECTION 6. Guidelines for Expropriation Proceedings. - Whenever it is

the proper court under the following guidelines:

the court in favor of the owner the amount eguivalent to the sum of: notice to the defendant, the implementing agency shall immediately deposit to (a) Upon the filing of the complaint or at any time thereafter, and after due

1Evergreen Manufacturing Corp., vs. Republic. G.R. No. 218628. Sept. 6. 2017

Department of Transportation Page 3 of 4 T-0341-2020 JUN 2 3 2020

(1) One hundred percent (100%) of the value of the land based on the current relevant zonal valuation of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) issued not more than three (3) vears prior to the filing of the expropriation complaint subject to subparagraph (c) of this section;

XXX XXX XXX

(c) xxx xxxxxx. In provinces, cities, municipalities, and other areas where there is no zonal valuation, or where the current zonal valuation has been in force for more than three (3) years, the BIR is mandated, within the

period of sixty (60) days from the date of filing of the expropriation case, to conduct a zonal valuation of the area, based on the land classification done by the city or municipal assessor.

(d) With reference to subparagraph (a)( 1) of this section, in case the completion of a government infrastructure project is of utmost urgency and importance, and there is no land classification or no existing zonal valuation of the area concerned or the zonal valuation has been in force for more than three (3) years, the implementing agency shall use the BIR zonal value and land classification of similar lands within the adjacent vicinity as the basis for the valuation.

XXX XX xxx. " (Emphasis supplied)

involving real property located in areas where there is yet no zonal valuation, the BIR is It is clear, based on the foregoing provisions, that in expropriation proceedings

mandated to conduct a zonal valuation of such areas based on the land classification done by

the city or municipal assessor.

As you represented, the City Assessor of Quezon City has classified the subject

properties located along Quirino Highway, Barangay Greater Lagro, Quezon City as

residential and that the owner has consistently and expressly declared such properties as

residential. You likewise represented that the completion of the MRT-7 Project is of utmost

urgency and importance and that there it yet no zonal valuation for residential purposes in the area since DOF DO No. 026-2019 prescribes zonal values only for commercial properties

along Quirino Highway, Barangay Greater Lagro, Quezon City.

With such representations that the properties are in the area along Quirino Highway.

Barangay Greater Lagro, Quezon City classified as residential, that there is yet no zonal

valuation for residential purposes in the area as DOF DO No. 026-2019 prescribes zonal

values only for commercial properties, and that the completion of the MRT-7 Project is of

utmost urgency and importance, we agree that the DOTr is authorized, pursuant to RA No.

10752, to use the BIR zonal value and land classification of similar lands within the adjacent

vicinity as the basis for the valuation of such residential properties, for the purpose of determining the amount to be deposited as a requirement in the expropriation proceedings. As

you stated, the current BIR Zonal value for residential lands in Barangay 183, Caloocan City,

which are adjacent to the subject properties, is at PhP per square meter.

Page 4 of 4 Department of Transportation OT-0341-2020 JUN 2 3 202D

purpose of determining thetax base in the computation of applicable national internal revenue taxes on properties along Quirino Highway,Barangay Greater Lagro,Quezon City clssified as commercial.It was not intended tomodify the residential classification thus isued by the City Assessor. Pursuant to Section 6[E]of the 1997 Tax Code, as amended, the Ruling upheld, for purposes of computing any internal revenue tax, the value of the properties Greater Lagro, Quezon City, subject of expropriation proceedings. To reiterate, such a as prescribed in DOF DO No. 026-2019 as it is higher than those prescribed by the City Assessor. Such a Ruling was not issued for the purpose of determining the proper valuation or just compensation of properties classified as residential along Quirino Highway, Barangay determination, including that of the actual location of the properties based on their land classification, is essentially a judicial prerogative, to be governed by the pertinent provisions of RA No. 10752. Based thereon, we, thus, clarify that BIR Ruling No. OT-0196-2020 was issued for the

if upon investigation, it will be disclosed that the facts are different, then this ruling shall be considered null and void. This ruling is being issued on the basis of the foregoing facts as represented. However.

Commissioner of Internal Revenue 1aroman CAESAR R. DULAY

K-1 035541 O