COMPANIA DE GARAY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY SECOND DIVISION COMPANIA DE GARAY, INC., CTA CASE NO. 9540 Petitioner, Members: -versus- CASTANEDA, JR., Chairperson, MINDARO-GRULLA, and COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL BACORRO-VILLENA, JJ. REVENUE, Promulgated: Respondent. JAN q 8 ZOZO X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RESOLUTION CASTANEDA, JR., J,: For this Court's resolution is respondent's Motion for Reconsideration Re: Decision dated 24 September 2019, with petitioner's Comment on Motion for Reconsideration (Re: Decision dated 24 September 2019) filed through registered mail on November 7, 2019. For easy reference, the dispositive portion of the assailed Decision reads : " WHEREFORE, the instant Petition for Review is GRANTED. Accordingly, the assessments under Assessment Notice No. RR-16-099-082-2016 for deficiency Income Tax, Value Added Tax and Compromise cJl-

RESO LUTIO N CTA Case No. 9540 Penalty for taxable year 2012 are CANCELLED and SET A S I D E. SO ORDERED." In the instant motion, respondent asserts that the issuance of an LOA is not indispensable when it is respondent who issues an LN. On the other hand, petitioner counters by essentially reiterating the reasoning in the assailed Decision. After considering the arguments of both parties, the Court rules in favor of petitioner. It is worth stressing that a duly issued LOA is indispensable in assessment cases, even if it is respondent who issues an LN. This is categorically declared by the Supreme Court in Medicard Philippines, Inc. v. Commissioner ofInternal Revenue.1 To reiterate: "The Court cannot convert the LN into the LOA required under the law even if the same was issued by the CIR himself. Under RR No. 12-2002, LN is issued to a person found to have underreported sales/receipts per data generated under the RELIEF system. Upon receipt of the LN, a taxpayer may avail of the BIR's Voluntary Assessment and Abatement Program. If a taxpayer fails or refuses to avail of the said program, the BIR may avail of administrative and criminal remedies, particularly closure, criminal action, or audit and investigation. Since the law specifically requires an LOA and RMO No. 32- 2005 requires the conversion of the previously issued LN to an LOA, the absence thereof cannot be simply swept under the rug, as the CIR would have it. In fact Revenue Memorandum Circular No. 40-2003 considers an LN as a notice of audit or investigation only for the purpose of disqualifying the taxpayer from amending his returns. " Thus, for this reason alone, the Court finds the instant motion unmeritorious. Hence, the denial of the same is in order. 7t- 1 G.R. No. 222743, April 5, 2017.

RESOLUTION CTA case No. 9540 WHEREFORE, respondent's Motion for Reconsideration Re : Decision dated 24 September 2019 is DENIED, for lack of merit. SO ORDERED. fk-~'t: r . ~ ~ t>l..r~� JUAN ITO C. CASTANEDA, JR. Associate Justice WE CONCUR: '- ~N . M~~-btJL. 0-VILLENA CIELITO N. MINDARO-GRULLA Associate Justice