PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. JACK MENDOZA, Service Road I, Lawang Bato, Valenzuela City (At-Large)
Republic of the Philippines COURT OF TAX APPEALS Quezon City SECOND DIVISION PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, CTA Crim. Case No. 0-281 Plaintiff, (I.S. No. 2007-1097) -versus- For: Violation of Section 3602 of the TCCP JACK MENDOZA, Service Road I, Lawang Bato Promulgated: Valenzuela City, MAY 30 2012/ Accused. ~7 f: Iff! t�/11. x- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x RESOLUTION Before this Court is the Information filed by plaintiff, People of the Philippines, against Jack Mendoza, for violation of Section 3602 of the Tariff and Customs Code of the Philippines. A perusal of the Information, signed by Prosecution Attorney Xerxes U. Garcia, disclose that the same failed to state the amount of taxes and fees being claimed by plaintiff which are due on the goods allegedly imported by the herein Accused. Section 7(b)(1) explicitly provides this Court's jurisdiction over cases involving criminal offenses, and reads as follows: "Sec. 7. Jurisdiction. - The CTA shall exercise: XXX XXX X X X. (b) Jurisdiction over cases involving criminal offenses as herein provided: (1) Exclusive original jurisdiction over all criminal offenses arising from violations of the
Crim. Case No. 0 -281 RESOLUTION National Internal Revenue Code or Tariff and Customs Code and other laws administered by the Bureau of Internal Revenue and the Bureau of Customs: Provided, however, That offenses or felonies mentioned in this paragraph where the principal amount of taxes and fees, exclusive of charges and penalties, claimed is less than One Million Pesos (Pl,OOO,OOO.OO) or where there is no specified amount claimed shall be tried by the regular Courts and the jurisdiction of the CTA shall be appellate. Any provision of law or the Rules of Court to the contrary notwithstanding, the criminal action and the corresponding civil action for the recovery of civil liability for taxes and penalties shall at all times be simultaneously instituted with, and jointly determined in the same proceeding by the CTA, the filing of the criminal action being deemed to necessarily carry with it the filing of the civil action, and no right to reserve the filing of such civil action separately from the criminal action will be recognized. " Corollary thereto, Section 3(b)(l) and (2) of Rule 4 of the Revised Rules of the CTA, as amended, provides thus: "Sec. 3. Cases within the jurisdiction of the Court in Division. - The Court in Division shall exercise: XXX XXX X X X. (b) Exclusive jurisdiction over cases involving criminal offenses, to wit: (1) Original jurisdiction over all criminal offenses arising from violations of the National Internal Revenue Code or Tariff and Customs Code and other laws administered by the Bureau of Internal Revenue or the Bureau of Customs, where the principal amount of taxes and fees, exclusive of charges and penalties, claimed is one million pesos or more; and (2) Appellate jurisdiction over appeals from the judgments, resolutions or orders of the Regional Trial Courts in their original jurisdiction in criminal offenses arising from violations of the National Internal
Crim. Case No. 0-281 RESOLUTION Revenue Code or Tariff and Customs Code and other laws administered by the Bureau of Internal Revenue or Bureau of Customs, where the principal amount of taxes and fees, exclusive of charges and penalties, claimed is less than one million pesos or where there is no specified amount claimed." Clearly, under the above-quoted provisions, this Court does not have jurisdiction over the instant case as, reiterating, the Information failed to state the amount of taxes and fees being claimed by plaintiff. WHEREFORE, the Information dated April 18, 2012, filed against accused, Jack Mendoza, for violation of Section 3602 of the Tariff and Customs Code of the Philippines is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. ~~ C. a.t-'a.-uz~ I 5Q'R.. JUANITO C. CASTANEDA, Associate Justice ~� (On Leave) CAESAR A. CASANOVA CIELITO N. MINDARO-GRULLA Associate Justice Associate Justice
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.