CTA Case No. 1835 (Decision)
''...... ~El"U8T.TC OF TRE PHILIPPINF...s COURT OF TAX APPEA.L8 Q(JEZON CITY ;..... , ~,�..t ., .. . i'. � �3 -- ... ... ... \'f - -- .......... � ~(,(,.- -;D t � 1"7 t 90
2 �� > "' �j ' .... ... 't c. ' eo ro t' ... .) ;. ~t d if . ~. t; r ?, t f! I. .. ') t# � 'l ~ t',) " .. ., -r ti � Lt ?C � ) t ' ..u � J: f tb. ur 1�' 91
" .. cf -J , ,. ... 'J 1 0 , ... ' ... 1- 5 .' 92
. � . .35 - ' � � t 1- .... , l ,:.; 9 3
� ... ll .. �. � . j n ... 1 c ' t l i) ;' i 94
I . .. (,C �. ,. ;:C t ./ r �, h ,1 'I t.. 95
I 7 \� " .a .1 >!>' ' ' r- 'l 0 1 � t.O 0 .;..;�d.. un f' ��.,u ~0 "'t.t:~ 1 :. c co ..- lt, 0 1 1: i' 96
\ ~~ _,A .!. �� � " � ,' _ i c i t .� ,� t .. ~~ ; 97
c ' �.e ... � t t." r 11 'UQ. "" .. '1r ' d ..1 lt'. - .r 1 n t. o �len nc .. .. tt � ;';. 9 8 �
t ~J t 1 l" i - ,, ' n� -. I�~ 99
.., ' ' .. 5 1~'. .. l �~� t. i c��. c Uon / 1 . li 1 t t r- J 'I t 0 i'u ' "�' t 0 0 Ort l.'i/0 Oji ., ' n (r ' � '� t ' ()t~t� t '� ot n J(. "'Ct"o 10 0
� ,. 5 ). u. 3" :;S ~ . . ... b ~' . u ' lt! ... f, .�:) ~ B.li'f�'' crow�� "' .% �tt> ' 0 ., 'eo it ., .... ... 'J' "~:) , tt � .. ~ 4\ i~!t� 1. to .1. oct 4 tq ;1 1.-riP-.,),: � \-..~> ... l .~t . � .. ~ � \J n �. (~ j} .. ... r ~� "'_�.', .... e... l v'("j ' J ) .. J 101
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- GOLDEN ARCHES REALTY CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7201)
- CTA Case No. O-13 (Decision)(CTA Case No. O-13)
- PETRON CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1835)
- OPULENT LANDOWNERS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8956)
- CTA Case No. 5003 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5003)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PENN PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1002)
- CANLUBANG WATERWORKS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10682)
- FABTECH KITCHENS UNLIMITED, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9589)
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。