MERCURY DRUG CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY THIRD DIVISION MERCURY DRUG CORPORATION, Petitioner, -versus- CTA CASE NO. 9413 THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. x-------------------------------------------------------------x ORDER Today, counsel for petitioner, Atty. Daniel Angelo V. Mendoza, and counsel for respondent, Atty. Katrina C. Muli, appeared. There being no objection interposed by counsel for respondent and for the reasons stated therein, petitioner's "Manifestation and Motion to Withdraw Petition" filed on June 7, 2017 was GRANTED. As prayed for, the "Petition for Review" filed on August 4, 2016 is deemed WITHDRAWN. This case ts deemed CLOSED and TERMINATED. SO ORDERED. Quezon City, Philippines, June 13, 2017. LOVEL~. BAUTISTA Associate Justice ~.~ ~'-- MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBAN Associate Justice
同类文件 CTA Orders
- CTA Case No. 2121 (Order)(CTA Case No. 2121)
- SNOWY OWL ENERGY INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9618)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. MAXIMO HERNANDEZ y MANIEGO alias MAXIMO H. HERNANDEZ, PONCIANO HERNANDEZ y BUCO, DOMINADOR LALU y PASCUAL, FELIPE MANGILIT y HERNANDEZ, MICHAEL MANLICLIC y VINUYA, DANILO SANTOS y SANGUYO and JOHNREY RETOBADO y PAGLINAWAN (c/o Brgy. Mapaniqui, Candaba, Pampanga and/or Samahang Magsasakang Kapampangang at Katagalugan Multi-purpose Cooperative, Garlang, San Ildefonso, Bulacan) All at large(CTA Case No. O-379)
- CTA Case No. 2158 (Order)(CTA Case No. 2158)
- PHILIPPINE PHARMA PROCUREMENT, INC. (FORMERLY: PITC PHARMA, INC.) v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER CAESAR R. DULAY(CTA Case No. 9734)
- PURECHEM CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9653)
- MA. ERLINDA T. ONG v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10100)
- REPUBLIC CEMENT SERVICES, INC. [Formerly Lafarge Cement Services (Philippines), Inc.] v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10066)
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。