PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. MAXIMO HERNANDEZ y MANIEGO alias MAXIMO H. HERNANDEZ, PONCIANO HERNANDEZ y BUCO, DOMINADOR LALU y PASCUAL, FELIPE MANGILIT y HERNANDEZ, MICHAEL MANLICLIC y VINUYA, DANILO SANTOS y SANGUYO and JOHNREY RETOBADO y PAGLINAWAN (c/o Brgy. Mapaniqui, Candaba, Pampanga and/or Samahang Magsasakang Kapampangang at Katagalugan Multi-purpose Cooperative, Garlang, San Ildefonso, Bulacan) All at large
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY THIRD DIVISION PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff, -versus- MAXIMO HERNANDEZ y CTA CRIM. CASE NO. 0-379 MANIEGO, PONCIANO HERNANDEZ y BUCO, DOMINADOR LALU y PASCUAL, FELIPE MANGILIT y HERNANDEZ, MICHAEL MANLICLIC y VINUYA, DANILO SANTOS y SANGUYO and JOHNREY RETOBADO y PAGLINAWAN, Accused. x-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x ORDER During the promulgation of judgment, only accused Maximo Hernandez y Maniego and Felipe Mangilit and their counsel, Atty. Vanessa Q. Maguigad, appeared. Senior Assistant City Prosecutor Dennis E. Aguila entered his special appearance for the People. All of the accused were duly notified of today' s proceeding. As agreed upon by the parties, the Court proceeded to read the dispositive portion of the decision which states: WHEREFORE, premises considered, this case is DISMISSED for failure of the prosecution to prove beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of all the accused. Therefore, accused Maximo Hernandez y Maniego alias Maximo H. Hernandez, Ponciano Hernandez y Buco, Dominador Lalu y Pascual,
ORDER CTA Crim. Case No. 0-379 Page 2 of2 Felipe Mangilit y Hernandez, Michael Manliclic y Vinuya, Danilo Santos y Sanguyo and Johnrey Retobado y Paglinawan are hereby ACQUITTED of the crime charged. Let copies of the Decision be sent to the parties. SO ORDERED. Quezon City, Philippines, May 23,2018. LOVELVR. BAUTISTA Assbciate Justice ~. ~ .,7 ' - ' ~r-11"-''� FABON-VICTORINO MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBAN Associate Justice j
同类文件 CTA Orders
- CTA Case No. 2158 (Order)(CTA Case No. 2158)
- PHILIPPINE PHARMA PROCUREMENT, INC. (FORMERLY: PITC PHARMA, INC.) v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE, REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER CAESAR R. DULAY(CTA Case No. 9734)
- PURECHEM CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9653)
- MA. ERLINDA T. ONG v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10100)
- REPUBLIC CEMENT SERVICES, INC. [Formerly Lafarge Cement Services (Philippines), Inc.] v.COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10066)
- CTA Case No. 1847 (Order)(CTA Case No. 1847)
- MUSAHAMAT FARMS INCORPORATED v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9796)
- CHERIE MARIE T. CHAN v. COMMISSIONER OF THE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10240)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。