CTA Case No. OC-444 (Decision)
.:1' _ _.,._ __ .... .. .. . . . . it 'on � ) ~1""j ~~ � . t1 c�.. x �a � X� � � � - � � � � �X
1 -- 2 1 �� 1, t1 i . '1 (� � 1� j i� 4 �� - s 0 f � i ... � � � 1 �- a � d ;! 1 � f t x. t f �� tn n � 7, � � �- n. i l1 � /� 33 1 . 1
� -- s �� �� ( � � � � � � 0 t -
� � .. �1 i � 1 .o n � � f � l.l 0 I th i ' I � i � ! � � ~ h � i " :1 t i ... ..,. r t o� t ri c� on cm h a 1 � lly n ,.....,........... T i � n ill& 0 1 pot c ... l ' .� 3. 7 , 17 � 33
� -- ,1 � 334
1 - � � .J~ - 0 ( 1 �) -7 � �� � 2. � it- � le �( (- () �� 1
� -1- - 7� � � ,1 . 41 f ic 1 � l f � i c if e 0 :� 3 3 6
� - � � � .J - � c � � e (1 1- � � �� � �� 337
- � is t II - �--------�� � � f f �- t 1 l, t x. t r� � u t 27, �
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- FIRST PHILIPPINE POWER SYSTEMS, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9067)
- PHILAM FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7765)
- MISNET EDUCATION INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9941)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. NEW YORK BAY PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2748)
- MARC G. CUYCO and KEVIN G. CUYCO v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-156)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. 8198)
- RENOIR IMPLEMENTATION SERVICES INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10840)
- CTA Case No. 2911 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2911)
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。