CTA Case No. 1245 (Decision)
.,, . ' u , � E PBILIPl" .["(t!J) COlJR'l' OF TAX APPE.A.LI QUEWN CITY r, . � , . ~ �d:~nt . � ~J - - - - M ~~ - 'd1 � .... � . . .. ��� .. fir � �� I . .. if. 317 .. ~
.t Jr , c . .'":W eu.r�.fi ~ 3:; t.e .1:(rr er:>t:h. 1 .. . .. . . . . ... ~ ; ~ ., 1 n f 318
.- . t . t,::-r .r ... �� f':: .' t'. 319
� e � A \'t � � ;:; ~.~ ; '39u, 9Jl..� 0 1 19.1 l t 320 .'
) . �� � � ... . � � � � � � .� � � �� �� � � " �� �� � (~ ��� � � � � . If . �� � � � � �� � � ��� � �� � .. t ' 321
t- - _, . . 2 H ', 1 c ) <i t 1 322
' 1 , .... � � 323
~. 1.., 32 Ll .'
..,....,., .. ....... � t t t. ... s v.ere fals e . 325
... ,. - -. '. �r ,~hs o.n; ~e � � ~ - t n "-;s . {,;r c (': ) J:V. ., �.:c, bu: . t;� ..1.. 1 t1 .. .i QJ:" ~tc- �-n::~"' :tot. . .t t. t �!" '1 r "�". "... t . t~t <f .i or. r �� .._-fj l �l Co , ny . - 1. 326
1 , .. . -.... . . Jl. 1 ~'s are ) 't 327
1 i 1I � t 328
s ;.;'& r .�u tiortn ni't tl�, � 5 un :. o , .,..,1 r it;.;, ? t 15,���6, nu 1 r..._u ;:.1 ~~. 1t~ '!1 tiorl et _, ~' � h h.at la .. 1- d._ . lin 329
� ... l � l � ..d. / 'J.'.e!' o: f. '. nal Revenue Dode _& � ' 11 ' ~'1. � 330 I ' 'I
- � � � .. .) j � , ... 331
'� "'1t ! l' .- .... ... .... ... � . .. .. .- � �� �� r~ 1f :.v ... 332 I
: .(.;, ~!~f''� ... "} .. l ;:--t 5- � 7 � r �-"t'1 , . 1c.. ,ry1 ~� � .,� � 333
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- PROVICIAL GOVERNMENT OF CAGAYAN REP. BY HONORABLE GOVERNOR ALVARO T. ANTONIO AND EMILIA L. IRINGAN, IN HER CAPACITY AS PROVINCIAL TREASURER v. SMART COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (SMART)(CTA Case No. EB 1137)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. RURAL BANK OF BACNOTAN (LA UNION), INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2436)
- PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2949)
- CTA Case No. 5188 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5188)
- CTA Case No. 1699 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1699)
- ZUELLIG PHARMA ASIA PACIFIC LTD. PHILS. ROHQ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9025)
- IFC CAPITALIZATION (EQUITY) FUND, LP v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9148)
- CTA Case No. 4267 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4267)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。