CTA Case No. OC-308 (Decision)
. . - - - -��4 <,,1>''\.l.lllLH... !If TAl! HIL f t"~UUf\T 0 \X APP - 1' ... �0 .......... C IN ''�1 .., l r:ro t - r 0 t hol t1on r h 0 !] t 0 2 ,3 J 1 j ot ; il c r o i OSGI or r 19 . I ! :l ' ' -o or 1th 1 t r, Jill llg�.t' e 0 ... uao P. 1 .50. t t t ra rt g or t � . 7, c :r .) bu b t f! or tr- of t o1end - d d 0 1 te t ' r a ut th t h o' or of' th 1 1 ti 1 (I � t � ). 1 0 1 g t:r t 1 n ct on c rrI 17 6
.. - cl t sd t t � r .), t ) 1 ... � 177
� � In - l co t 0- 8 t 1 0 ( 7, 178 �
3 .. - - 1 t � ( r .. ( 0I 1 0- t ' � 00 179
l 1 - -'- l o lt.l r b r �rt o p e. � 1 0 , Mill s . . Ag by l l 0'' , ~h ' {- ll;zh bit ....3 t h s cone u.sion is c ... ul .&.1!0 n- l v 1 ac ol c on "'""'~"' {-.: r in 1 n 11 tf l l ( �w r I . cr no 1t 1 l. 9, j lll n, 3~ Br.,1. i. i)85i . ~ �o n, � � � o- � (195 ) ; .) r I o. ( ,.; Yor ) M -o� D t. )) j 1 () Y't f .1 l 1 nr 1.:> 11 I , e!o, the ~ponr" nt' <lhal"' au.d ris- in ... :r� or 1nco $t cann t u- f'r ' , r ' .. t s t 4 1c1 ie o 180 J
I -- ni 1n t ' t 1 0 � 0 u d n so a o t �� 181
308 . 7 ... l .. I \ f priV� o.rreot t 1tion.er for t x year ~ ' i 1 trp 0 th d tiei 0 a . .. nt t eo p th 0 � tb - . t � !t pon 'P 0 �� l 0 th � s~ . I t en ad t i s asaossw. nt on h bel1 f t b oi no r � t l.t< a f i -d . it tur d o t t t r - or i d ot t n. t 1 he inco df fro on r u repor�tGd n r t urn f or rl Till ow co 0 t t tt er 0 hat o.i e u d1 tn hi 1 o t r t rn� nct!on fo 5 9' T Cmt. i.nco pu s . Ill <11 llow r .ro lo 0 . ...... t o ' - p n .. .. .. . . ... 6)1. 0 182
o. .... II 183
.. - p 1 ~h l 1 ' io P� ~ 9, .;; � '5A l to tb ' eons �~1 1 boV fi di n 1 y r 4?, 95' 951 � 0 t l- �tigation 0_ t � � ��� . ................... ~ ������,...... ,../1,. �. 18 !}
,. � - .. .� 7 � � . .. � ���� ���� - 0 t 185
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- PETRON CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (consolidated with CTA Case Nos. 9606 & 9645)(CTA Case No. 9565)
- CTA Case No. 2916 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2916)
- CTA Case No. 5971 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5971)
- CRISTETA M. ESTEBAN in her capacity as MUNICIPAL TREASURER OF NORZAGARAY, PROVINCE OF BULACAN and the MUNICIPALITY OF NORZAGARAY, PROVINCE OF BULACAN v. MIRANT (PHILIPPINES) ENERGY CORPORATION, Private respondent, AND HONORABLE MIRASOL O. DYCHINGCO, in her capacity as the Presiding Judge of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 20, Malolos, Bulacan(CTA Case No. AC-175)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SAN MIGUEL CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2326)
- CTA Case No. OC-377 (Decision)(CTA Case No. OC-377)
- CTA Case No. 2970 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2970)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. JCLN GLOBAL PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT CORP., JAMES CHRISTOPHER L. NAPOLES and, JO CHRISTINE L. NAPOLES(CTA Case No. EB CRIM-176)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。