CTA Decisions CTA Case No. 25992599 1978-02-28
CTA Case No. 2599 (Decision)
) ... '. . . � � ' 'U r t t � ' 78
� t .. � � � �- ,,'1 . ., t ' t � � �� ' 0 � ' 79
- t � ! . h o .. � t il 1 .... � 1 11 1 dt .. 80
.. .. ... � 1 t - , 81
� - .... � 1 � � \ � t � e � lf 82
� - �� � v� 83
� - 7 .. 0
� - - 85
- 9 ... 86
� 1 . 87
-- �I 88
� 89
� -- t u � t t � il 90
1 .. � J � ... � � t ;. 91
9 t X �ne ~...,_ til lid ercler d i� * .:1.:rs~ ndert i~ s -h� ���iJ.m ,, ,. ~ p 1..1 en l di :"llhi;Z! ,i,::i,'' �i tn 'U pro 92
.. � � - - " .. . t , ) 93
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- MUNICIPALITY OF PULILAN, represented by Municipal Mayor HON. MARIA ROSARIO O. MONTEJO and Municipal Accountant, MR. PAULO BERBENZANA v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10259)
- OCEANAGOLD (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1904)
- CTA Case No. 5380 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5380)
- PHILAM INSURANCE AGENCY AND CALL CENTER SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 792)
- WESTERN MINDANAO POWER CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9248)
- PHILAM FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 463)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. DOMINIUM REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 1713)
- A BROWN CO., INC v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6524)
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。