CTA Case No. 522 (Decision)
C Ok"' 1'1.. �.-HlLIPP'~ OF '1 ..... ' A.P.P~ J.UN1)..4 �{J.d. . �� r. ... r: ' 6 1 .. - .... .... .... ... . .. l .. ... .! .... t 1,� - 361
-i r ... . c� � 362 -
-- - 363
-- ... 365
� .... .. � 366
... r .... t 367
- "" r L � 368 _j
th . � ll, .... t tt ii � .t :1. ~ :!tl b t: i~ �r i,;!J( �(.,.vd .] :hl h du uot eonl&titut~ l~- t) oi - ~� � Cf:l t �f c fit o� '.1 �Lt!l~u~ .. ... t .. (If ~IIJ: f'or �n"t 369
r - I I ~ I t ... I f� 370
11 �rw. .;; _t'Q;r ft" r tv in ' '1.� �<itt. t i \o'l'~'i "'.r iaJ. J 1t '� ... �~ �- . ; :~, ��� lo ,;;; .. J, � �- . 371
.... l2 - pr s rr , t t) TX tin '"'~ � � tas. ( ��' j ln r�Ener~ 1.- ���1 _ tt�. � p~ t'tnt~b) tifilx :$ n t p�ti~ Wit!''<11l thf.IJ tl,;.,. �.. rSo~:rt .j' th .. lt th1f:11 t tvien'tv-f!ve ~ "' tt.tu~t� 'li (� � � t 0 t~ t X L..;.;-:.:;,. Th~ ~:.ou.,~ In tnt.,r~r~~>tirK '!)ru:t ':.Jrtstr4ttn t1J ~.h.#IJV~>::VtfiiOO S:"'idt 'In 'tt! in t:if!C c � ll�~c .. i .v.n vf :;;t,,tt .>i!lt', to be :aan. t~' on th hn& no 11-e~ t tor! t.~ th.� 1~� t t r ~ t: ' .. p-J~.tl~".t vf' th .Ph:'L!:t':f!' � t _n... zy ttri l Corr � � m.t. ~o . lt):'f7 .. ) �X JC: X !hi.S pro� 1'lli r� ;L$ { .(.L �to 'f� l t ca;;ntt!.t"" '1,..; i e.c.lt,..l) th�, Coll~~cfvl:' ' of l'""l. rn� 1 ht}V( �1u\"" Ti a" fi te ::.tl . ��"., 3 ') ~~ I ""'
.$ l a� fo or 0 r. 1 n' � t � ~ld not 0! f v 1 ::.. to 3 9 !"; v'
1 374
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 37 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 37)
- METROPOLITAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6923)
- CITY GOVERNMENT OF QUEZON CITY, as represented by Mr. Edgar T. Villanueva, in his capacity as City Treasurer of Quezon City v. NATIONAL GRID CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES(CTA Case No. AC-351)
- CE PHILIPPINES LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 730)
- CTA Case No. 3374 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3374)
- PHILIPPINE GEOTHERMAL PRODUCTION COMPANY, INC., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9663)
- CTA Case No. 5533 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5533)
- ST. TIMOTHY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, ST. MATTHEW GEN. CONTRACTOR & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ALPHA & OMEGA CONTRACTOR & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, ST. GERRARD CONSTRUCTION GEN. CONTRACTOR & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, and PACIFICO F. DISCAYA II, v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10472)
想要这份文件的分析?
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。