CTA Case No. 540 (Decision)
� � - ��� .. --- -- - / � ' �' � ... � 245
- f � , ; t � t - � � t , � ' a t 0 ' 246 �
- .. . . -~ - t rh - c r r r r qu � 1 p 1t1on � � t1 w1 b - ' tt t " i l �c Q - ef:!e en 1'J t. ... t uc ' �� 0t e t r e pe I � g ' co 11 1 na 95'/ , 't' t at 0 ,, 0 � t 'l u� Y. t he R 1 .. in ti tor t oa 0 i t0 .OI � ,., ., y 9...8, � �. h� .' 247
- .. a 1 5o ld 19 n t -''18 t . t l l t 3l4 . 6 �� tez th . 6, � , �iv ll' �}! th t ...b, '9 e ptt 1 et t ' (t r� ...n � c rt? e . ' t �11+ b1 i p t t ioner' :i ..c m tor 95 .. i r e .,. ~t io ,: r pon� en , ett at f.,, l' ll , .s a in �t ! on t n of 6�� , ) . J . l,5l t 1 le l1. iv-e ".'1 Ut' r ,. t:tl Jun tt., 9!$8 , ,...t i :10!:1 t' ,... . 1 u pr n for ur r soluti ~ :r r low o:r no ~ tn . .r1~ht o Jtl~ -� oJ.l t t~� q e ti a .v .,� � �htbe!' tn t :.r-14~ , 314- . &9 51 r bu in .. ; 3� O..t. t,,"' ,j.r. r:.c;y r 'it n r ap 'h fi:r � i&'U& t .tid1t 1Jl r tall: in q t t, 248 .
. "' . 1J ... .... ' � � � � ' 1 � � � 249
� - 1 t r i l �t 250
� "' ?; � 1 l . #1 � . o, 1 B 23 J . oC ' ) I 1 la 1 18 t i h � c 1 t: e h t l t h t, i6 0 t � � 1h 1 tt � ti wo o ~ r 1 u co t 1 1 t 1 by, � t ou t .� � 'l 9 ;; c 251
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- MANNASOFT TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8745)
- WHOLESOME FOODS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9362)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PAYMENTWALL INC.(CTA Case No. EB 2510)
- CTA Case No. 5145 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5145)
- POWER SECTOR ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MANAGEMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9235)
- NATIONAL GRID CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES v. CENTRAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS, AND LOCAL BOARD OF ASSESSMENT APPEALS AND CITY ASSESSOR OF BUTUAN CITY(CTA Case No. EB 801)
- CTA Case No. 716 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 716)
- CTA Case No. 3547 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3547)
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。