CTA Decisions CTA Case No. 11781178 1964-05-18
CTA Case No. 1178 (Decision)
} P THl!: I" HIL.l.l",., , r.A.� L! ~ .> 1\l!W. o. ... !' rf Qi nI p '� l� �<' -. .r ('l ~ f ' 0 3 1- 1 t t; 'l, . t t ' .. Iii yr tt ... � � ec 0 11 ..,.. pt 1 , 07 ' fl' � ,5 to n in ic ' - n c pl y0 1 tt r T' t. r n t~ t r Yl ' only or t l' 115
� l7 .... . ... l .�.. 1, ' t 1- ' � , ' t � � � t: - �' t !� 1 16
.. ' ' c - 7 1 t or � rt l' 117
-.. ? 1 .... �� 1 t 59 f' ---7~~~--------------~~ t o f' �� . l .. .'� t ' ' 1' 118
... !1 - t , !' 119
� 17 - ... ti t 0 t ' � r ' � �t 0 h ' � ' .) 0 � �� ~c . 9, f.' 1 n l 1 . ,. l 0 I. �a ( "' 1 1 0 ) '0 .!t 120
� 17 tl -7 .J ' t t � ' l' � ~� .L j' 1 2 1
同类文件 CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 3069 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3069)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MT. BLANC MOTORS, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1667)
- CTA Case No. 6434 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6434)
- CTA Case No. 1347 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1347)
- PHILEX MINING CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7115)
- METRO RAIL TRANSIT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9651)
- CTA Case No. 6761 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6761)
- CTA Case No. 551 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 551)
想要这份文件的分析？
让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比，或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。