Circulars[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 22-2013, February 08, 2013 ] 2013-02-08

[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 22-2013, February 08, 2013 ]

[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 22-2013, February 08, 2013 ]

[ OCA CIRCULAR NO. 22-2013, February 08, 2013 ]

TO : THE COURT OF APPEALS, SANDIGANBAYAN, COURT OF TAX APPEALS, REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS, SHARI'A DISTRICT COURTS, METROPOLITAN TRIAL COURTS, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS IN CITIES, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURTS, MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURTS, SHARI'A CIRCUIT COURTS, THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF STATE PROSECUTOR, PUE5LIC ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE INTEGRATED BAR OF THE PHILIPPINES

SUBJECT: SUSPENSION FROM THE PRACTICE OF LAW FOR FOUR (4) YEARS OF ATTY. EDUARDO D. RESURRECCION

For your information and guidance, quoted hereunder is the dispositive portion of the Decision of the Court En Banc dated 14 August 2012, in Administrative Case No. 9074, entitled "Grace M. Anacta vs. Atty. Eduardo D. Resurreccion," to wit:

"WHEREFORE, respondent Atty. Eduardo D. Resurreccion is ordered SUSPENDED from the practice of law for four years. He is also DIRECTED to return to the complainant the amount of P42.000.0C within thirty (30) days from the promulgation of this Decision."

In a Resolution dated 11 September 2012, the Court further CONSIDERED as SERVED the Notice of Judgment with a copy of Decision dated 14 August 2012 tent to respondent Atty. Eduardo D. Resurreccion at his given address which was returned unserved with notation on the return of service "Returned: Refused to Accept; other reasons went abroad since 2009."

8 February 2013

(SGD.) JOSE MIDAS P. MARQUEZ Court Administrator

打开发布机构原始记录 ↗

同类文件 Circulars

想要这份文件的分析?

让 ASG 法律 AI 为你总结、与其他判例对比,或说明它如何适用于你的情形 — 它检索的正是同一个数据库。