Nov 23, 2015property lawforeclosureassignment of creditbangko sentral ng pilipinasreal estate mortgagesupreme court

Assignment of Mortgage and BSP’s Foreclosure Authority Hinges on Valid Deed

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when a bank may foreclose a mortgage assigned to it, requiring a valid deed of assignment.


The Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas v. Libo-on (G.R. No. 173864) clarifies a crucial point in Philippine property law: a bank or financial institution cannot foreclose on a real estate mortgage unless there is a valid, properly documented assignment of the mortgage credit. The case arose when the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) attempted to foreclose on a property mortgaged to a rural bank that had pledged the mortgage documents to BSP as collateral for its own loan. The Court ruled that BSP had no authority to foreclose, because the rural bank had not validly assigned the mortgage to it.

The Facts of the Case

Spouses Agustin and Mercedes Libo-on obtained loans from the Rural Bank of Hinigaran in 1997, securing the loans with a real estate mortgage over their property. The rural bank later obtained its own loans from BSP and, as security, pledged and deposited the Libo-ons’ promissory note and mortgage documents to BSP under a “promissory note with trust receipt agreement.”

When the Libo-ons defaulted, BSP demanded payment and eventually filed for extrajudicial foreclosure of the Libo-ons’ property. The Libo-ons sued, arguing that BSP had no authority to foreclose because there was no privity of contract between them and BSP, and no valid assignment of the mortgage. The trial court and the Court of Appeals sided with the Libo-ons, and BSP appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Issue: Does Pledging Mortgage Documents Constitute an Assignment of Credit?

The central question was whether BSP had the authority to foreclose the subject mortgage. BSP argued that the “promissory note with trust receipt agreement” operated as an assignment of credit, transferring to BSP the rural bank’s rights over the Libo-ons’ mortgage.

The Supreme Court disagreed. It explained that an assignment of credit is an agreement by which the owner of a credit transfers that credit, along with its accessory rights, to another person. A mortgage credit is a real right, and under Article 1625 of the Civil Code, an assignment of a credit involving real property produces no effect against third persons unless it appears in a public instrument and is recorded in the Registry of Property. Here, no deed of assignment was ever presented, and the documents BSP relied on did not contain the language of an absolute conveyance of title.

The Ruling: No Valid Assignment, No Foreclosure Authority

The Court held that the mere pledge and deposit of the mortgage contract, certificate of title, and promissory note did not give BSP the authority to intervene in the transaction between the Libo-ons and the rural bank, much less foreclose on the property.

The Court also noted a deeper problem: the rural bank was not the absolute owner of the property or the security documents it pledged to BSP. Under Article 2085 of the Civil Code, a valid pledge requires that the pledgor be the absolute owner of the thing pledged. Because the Libo-ons still owned the property during the term of the mortgage, the rural bank could not validly pledge the mortgage documents to BSP.

Finally, the Court examined the language of the promissory note with trust receipt agreement. The document used terms consistent with a loan secured by a pledge of collateral, not an assignment of credit. It even contained a trust receipt provision obligating the rural bank to collect payments and remit them to BSP — a concept inconsistent with an absolute conveyance of title. Without a valid assignment, BSP could not foreclose, and any attempt to appropriate the property would violate the prohibition on pactum commissorium under Article 2088 of the Civil Code.

Practical Takeaways

  • A mortgage credit is a real right. Its transfer or assignment must comply with the formalities of the Civil Code: it must appear in a public instrument and, if real property is involved, be recorded in the Registry of Property to bind third persons.
  • Pledging mortgage documents as collateral is not the same as assigning the mortgage. A bank that receives mortgage documents as security for a loan does not automatically acquire the right to foreclose on the underlying property.
  • Only the absolute owner of property can validly pledge or mortgage it. A mortgagee who holds documents as collateral cannot pledge those documents to another lender during the term of the mortgage.
  • Documentation matters. Lenders seeking to enforce a mortgage assigned to them must ensure a proper deed of assignment is executed and recorded; otherwise, their foreclosure authority may be challenged and invalidated.
  • Read the contract language carefully. Courts look to the parties’ intent as expressed in the document. Language suggesting a mere loan or pledge, rather than an absolute transfer of rights, will not support a claim of assignment.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your situation, ask ASG Legal AI or book a consultation.