Aug 27, 2014divorce recognitionfamily codeforeign divorceremarriagepassportcivil law

Divorce Recognition in the Philippines: What Ando v. DFA Means for Remarriage and Passport Issuance

The Supreme Court clarifies when a foreign divorce is recognized in the Philippines and what a Filipino spouse must prove before remarrying.


The Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Ando v. Department of Foreign Affairs (G.R. No. 195432) settled an important question for Filipinos married to foreigners: a foreign divorce decree does not automatically capacitate a Filipino spouse to remarry. The case also clarified the proper remedy when the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) refuses to issue a passport under a new married name. For Filipino spouses of aliens who have obtained a divorce abroad, the ruling is a practical reminder of what the law requires.

The Facts of the Case

Edelina T. Ando, a Filipina, married Yuichiro Kobayashi, a Japanese national, in Pampanga in September 2001. Three years later, Kobayashi obtained a divorce in Japan under Japanese law. The divorce certificate was authenticated by the DFA and registered with the Office of the Civil Registry of Manila.

Believing she was free to remarry, Ando married Masatomi Y. Ando in September 2005. When she later applied to renew her Philippine passport under her second husband’s surname, the DFA refused, saying she needed a court decision recognizing her second marriage as valid.

Ando filed a petition for declaratory relief before the Regional Trial Court (RTC), asking the court to declare her second marriage valid and to order the DFA to issue her a passport. The RTC dismissed the petition, ruling that she had no cause of action because her second marriage was bigamous—her first marriage had not been judicially recognized as dissolved. Ando appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Issue

The central issue was whether the RTC erred in dismissing Ando’s petition. More broadly, the case asked: when is a foreign divorce recognized in the Philippines, and what remedies are available to a Filipino spouse who wishes to remarry or obtain a passport under a new name?

The Court’s Ruling

The Supreme Court denied Ando’s petition, but without prejudice to her filing the proper actions. The Court made two key points.

First, the DFA’s refusal to issue a passport should have been appealed to the Secretary of Foreign Affairs under Section 9 of Republic Act No. 8239 (the Philippine Passport Act of 1996). The Implementing Rules and Regulations of the Act specify the documentary requirements for a married woman applying for a passport under her husband’s surname. If the DFA denies the application, the applicant must first appeal to the Secretary before going to court. Ando skipped this administrative remedy.

Second, and more importantly, a foreign divorce decree must be judicially recognized in the Philippines before a Filipino spouse can validly remarry. Citing Garcia v. Recio (418 Phil. 723 [2001]), the Court reiterated that a divorce obtained abroad by an alien spouse may be recognized here, provided the decree is valid under the alien’s national law. But presenting the divorce decree alone is not enough. The Filipino spouse must also prove the alien spouse’s national law—because Philippine courts do not take judicial notice of foreign laws. Both the divorce decree and the governing personal law of the alien must be alleged and proven like any other fact.

In Ando’s case, she failed to present evidence of Japanese law on divorce and of the validity of the divorce decree under that law. Without such proof, the Court could not declare her first marriage dissolved. Consequently, her second marriage was considered bigamous under Article 35(4) of the Family Code, and she had no cause of action for declaratory relief.

What This Means for Filipino Spouses

For a Filipino whose alien spouse obtained a divorce abroad, the path to remarriage is clear but requires more than the divorce certificate. The Filipino spouse must file a petition in a Philippine family court for the judicial recognition of the foreign divorce decree. In that petition, the spouse must present:

  • The divorce decree itself, duly authenticated;
  • Proof of the alien spouse’s national law on divorce, such as a copy of the relevant statute or a certification from a qualified expert; and
  • Evidence that the divorce was validly obtained under that law.

Only after the court issues a judgment recognizing the divorce may the Filipino spouse remarry.

Practical Takeaways

  • A foreign divorce is not automatically recognized in the Philippines. The Filipino spouse must obtain a judicial recognition of the divorce decree from a Philippine family court.
  • Proof of the alien spouse’s national law is essential. Courts do not take judicial notice of foreign laws; both the decree and the governing law must be alleged and proven.
  • Remarrying before judicial recognition makes the second marriage bigamous and void under Article 35(4) of the Family Code.
  • If the DFA denies a passport application, appeal first to the Secretary of Foreign Affairs under R.A. 8239 before going to court.
  • A petition for declaratory relief is not the correct remedy to compel the DFA to issue a passport or to validate a second marriage; the proper action is a petition for judicial recognition of the foreign divorce.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your situation, ask ASG Legal AI or book a consultation.