Sep 22, 1999hold departure ordercircular 39-97right to travelcriminal procedurephilippine courts

Hold Departure Orders in the Philippines: Court Jurisdiction and Your Travel Rights

Learn which Philippine courts can issue hold departure orders, the rules under Circular 39-97, and how these affect your right to travel.


A hold departure order (HDO) is a court directive that prevents a person from leaving the Philippines. It directly affects a fundamental right — the right to travel — so the rules on who may issue one and when are strict. A 1999 Supreme Court administrative case clarifies these boundaries and reminds judges that ignorance of the rules is no excuse.

The Case: Judge Adaoag’s Mistake

In Issuance of Hold Departure Order of Judge Luisito T. Adaoag (A.M. No. 99-8-126-MTC, September 22, 1999), a Municipal Trial Court (MTC) judge in Camiling, Tarlac issued hold departure orders in two criminal cases. The Secretary of Justice flagged the orders as contrary to Circular No. 39-97, issued by the Supreme Court on June 19, 1997.

The judge admitted the error, explaining he had no copy of the circular and was misled by a prosecutor’s motion. The Supreme Court was not sympathetic. It reprimanded the judge, noting that judges must keep abreast of legal developments. The Court cited two similar recent cases where judges were also reprimanded for issuing unauthorized HDOs.

The Rule: Only RTCs, Only in Certain Cases

Circular No. 39-97 sets clear limits. A hold departure order may be issued only by a Regional Trial Court (RTC) and only in criminal cases within the RTC’s exclusive jurisdiction. First-level courts — like Municipal Trial Courts, Metropolitan Trial Courts, and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts — have no authority to issue HDOs, even if the criminal case before them is otherwise valid.

This means that if a case is pending before a first-level court, or if the offense is outside an RTC’s exclusive jurisdiction, an HDO cannot be issued at all.

Strict Requirements for Issuance

Even when an RTC properly issues an HDO, the circular imposes procedural safeguards to protect the person affected:

  • The court must send copies of the HDO to the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) and the Bureau of Immigration (BI) within 24 hours of issuance.
  • The HDO must contain complete identifying information: the person’s full name (including middle name), date and place of birth, and last residence.
  • It must state the case title and docket number, the nature of the case, and the date of the order. A recent photograph, if available, should be included.

Automatic Cancellation Upon Acquittal or Dismissal

The circular also protects individuals whose cases end in their favor. When an accused is acquitted or the case is dismissed, the judgment or dismissal order must include the cancellation of the HDO. The court must furnish the DFA and BI with copies within 24 hours. This ensures that a person cleared of charges is not left stranded at the airport.

Why This Matters to You

An HDO is a serious restriction on liberty. It is not a routine procedural tool. The Supreme Court has emphasized that indiscriminate issuance of HDOs amounts to an infringement on the right to travel. The rules exist to prevent abuse and to ensure that only properly authorized courts, in appropriate cases, can restrict your movement.

Practical Takeaways

  • Verify the issuing court. If an HDO was issued by a first-level court (MTC, MeTC, MCTC), it is likely void under Circular No. 39-97.
  • Check the case type. An HDO is valid only in criminal cases within the exclusive jurisdiction of an RTC. If the offense is not within that scope, the order is improper.
  • Confirm the details. A valid HDO must contain your full name, birth date and place, last residence, case details, and the order’s date. Missing information may make the order defective.
  • Know your rights after acquittal or dismissal. The court must order cancellation of the HDO and notify the DFA and BI promptly. If you have been cleared, ensure the cancellation is actually transmitted.
  • If in doubt, seek help. An HDO can disrupt travel plans and cause serious inconvenience. If you believe an HDO was improperly issued against you, consult a lawyer promptly.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.

Have a question about this topic?

This article is general information, not legal advice. Ask ASG Legal AI for a cited, plain-language answer on your own situation — free, no sign-up.