Incestuous Sexual Abuse: When It Is Acts of Lasciviousness, Not RA 7610

---

The Supreme Court recently clarified an important distinction in Philippine criminal law: when a father's lewd acts against his sleeping daughter should be prosecuted as acts of lasciviousness under the Revised Penal Code rather than as a violation of Republic Act No. 7610. The ruling in People v. XXX (G.R. No. 274549, April 6, 2026) also addressed how courts should treat the aggravating circumstance of relationship and the corresponding penalties and damages.

The Facts

The accused was charged with lascivious conduct under Republic Act No. 7610 for allegedly touching his 13-year-old daughter's breasts and vagina while she was about to sleep beside him, her mother, and her sister. The victim protested loudly, waking her mother, who confronted the accused. The following day, the victim disclosed the assault, leading to the accused's arrest.

The Regional Trial Court convicted the accused under RA 7610, imposing reclusion perpetua. The Court of Appeals affirmed with modification, adding a fine and adjusting damages. The accused appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Issue

The central question was whether the acts committed constituted a violation of RA 7610 or acts of lasciviousness under the Revised Penal Code.

The Ruling

The Supreme Court, through Chief Justice Gesmundo, ruled that the accused should be convicted of acts of lasciviousness under the Revised Penal Code, not violation of RA 7610.

The Court applied its earlier ruling in Gramatica v. People (G.R. Nos. 260233 and 266039, August 12, 2025), which clarified that the provision of RA 7610 on lascivious conduct, as amended by RA 11648, applies to minors aged 16 and above but below 18 who are subjected to sexual abuse. The provision contemplates situations where the minor consents or indulges in sexual activity—albeit defectively—due to the adult's persuasion, inducement, or coercion. It does not apply where the minor is entirely unaware, unconscious, overpowered, or unwilling from the outset.

Since the victim in this case did not consent from the beginning and was a passive victim of a sudden lewd act while in a state of rest, the Court found the elements of RA 7610 absent. Instead, the acts constituted acts of lasciviousness under the Revised Penal Code.

Elements of Acts of Lasciviousness

To secure a conviction for acts of lasciviousness, the prosecution must prove: (1) the offender commits any act of lasciviousness or lewdness upon another person; and (2) the act is committed by using force or intimidation, when the offended party is deprived of reason or unconscious, or when the offended party is under 12 years of age.

The Court found both elements satisfied. The accused's acts of touching his daughter's breasts and vagina were clearly lewd. Intimidation was established through the accused's moral ascendancy over his daughter as her biological father. The Court reiterated that in incestuous sexual abuse cases, moral ascendancy supplants the element of intimidation.

Penalty and Damages

Under the Revised Penal Code, the penalty for acts of lasciviousness is prision correccional (six months and one day to six years). Because the aggravating circumstance of relationship was present—the accused being the victim's biological father—the penalty was imposed in its maximum period. Applying the Indeterminate Sentence Law, the accused received an indeterminate sentence of six months of arresto mayor to six years of prision correccional.

The Court increased the awards of civil indemnity, moral damages, and exemplary damages to PHP 150,000 each, citing the aggravating circumstance of relationship and the need to deter incestuous sexual abuse of minors.

Practical Takeaways

• Know the distinction: RA 7610 applies to minors aged 16-17 who "engage" in sexual conduct due to coercion or influence. Where the victim is a passive, unwilling recipient of sudden lewd acts, the proper charge is acts of lasciviousness under the Revised Penal Code.
• Moral ascendancy matters: In incestuous abuse cases, the father's moral ascendancy over his child satisfies the intimidation element required for acts of lasciviousness.
• Variance rule: Under the Rules of Court, an accused may be convicted of a lesser offense included in the offense charged, even if the information alleges a different crime.
• Credibility of child witnesses: Courts give great weight to the trial court's assessment of a minor victim's testimony, especially when affirmed by the appellate court. Minor inconsistencies do not undermine credibility.
• Damages can be increased: Courts may award damages beyond statutory minimums, particularly where the aggravating circumstance of relationship is present, to serve as a deterrent against incestuous abuse.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.