Invalid Tax Assessment: Why an Affidavit for Criminal Complaint Does Not Count

---

A taxpayer who receives a subpoena from the Department of Justice (DOJ) in connection with a criminal complaint for tax evasion may wonder whether the attached revenue officer's affidavit constitutes a formal tax assessment that can be protested. The Supreme Court, in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Pascor Realty and Development Corporation (G.R. No. 128315, June 29, 1999), settled this question: an affidavit supporting a criminal complaint is not an assessment, and a taxpayer cannot use it as a basis to appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA).

The Facts of the Case

Revenue officers examined the books of Pascor Realty and Development Corporation for taxable years 1986 to 1988, recommending assessments totaling over P10.5 million. Instead of issuing a formal assessment, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue filed a criminal complaint for tax evasion with the DOJ. Attached to the complaint was a Joint Affidavit of the revenue examiners detailing the tax liabilities.

The corporation and its officers filed an urgent request for reconsideration, but the Commissioner denied it, stating no formal assessment had been issued. The taxpayers then appealed to the CTA, arguing that the criminal complaint and its attached affidavit constituted an assessment. The CTA agreed, ruling that the details in the affidavit—the kind and amount of tax due, and the period covered—were sufficient to qualify as an assessment. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

The Issue

The central question was whether the revenue officers' affidavit attached to the criminal complaint constituted an assessment that could be questioned before the CTA.

The Supreme Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the affidavit was not an assessment. An assessment is more than a mere computation of tax liability. It must be sent to and received by the taxpayer, and it must demand payment within a specific period. The affidavit in this case contained no demand and was addressed to the Justice Secretary, not to the taxpayers.

The Court emphasized the legal effects of a proper assessment: it signals when penalties and interest begin to accrue, and it starts the period to protest. If a mere internal document could be treated as an assessment, taxpayers would be uncertain about their remedies and the periods for questioning the tax due.

Assessment Not Required Before Criminal Charges

The Court also addressed a related question: must an assessment precede a criminal complaint for tax evasion? The answer is no. Under the National Internal Revenue Code, in cases of fraudulent returns or failure to file a return, a criminal proceeding may be commenced without assessment. The criminal complaint is not a demand for payment but a means to penalize the taxpayer for violating the Tax Code. The Court cited Ungab v. Cusi (97 SCRA 877) to emphasize that a criminal action is independent of any protest before the CTA.

Practical Takeaways

• A document from the BIR that merely computes tax liability is not automatically an assessment. A valid assessment must be sent to the taxpayer and demand payment within a specified period.
• An affidavit attached to a criminal complaint for tax evasion, addressed to the DOJ, does not constitute an assessment that can be protested before the CTA.
• The BIR may file criminal charges for tax evasion without first issuing a formal assessment, particularly in cases of fraudulent returns or failure to file a return.
• A taxpayer who receives a DOJ subpoena should not assume that the underlying affidavit is an appealable assessment; the proper remedy differs depending on whether a formal assessment exists.
• The period to protest an assessment begins only upon receipt of a valid assessment notice.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.