Apr 24, 2023notarial lawattorney disciplinecode of professional responsibilitysupreme courtlegal ethics

Notarizing Without a Commission: Supreme Court Discipline for Lawyers

Learn the disciplinary consequences for Philippine lawyers who notarize documents without a valid commission, based on a recent Supreme Court ruling.


Notarizing documents without a valid commission is a serious ethical violation that can lead to suspension or even disbarment. A recent Supreme Court ruling underscores the strict consequences for lawyers who perform notarial acts without proper authority.

The case of Lazaro G. Javier, Jr. v. Atty. Carlos P. Rivera serves as a clear warning. A lawyer who notarized eight documents without a commission faced not only suspension but also disqualification from future notarial appointments, highlighting the Court's firm stance on protecting the integrity of notarization.

The Legal Framework: Notarial Rules and Ethical Duties

Notarization in the Philippines is governed by the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice. Under these rules, a commissioned notary public may perform notarial acts only within the territorial jurisdiction of the commissioning court and only for a period of two years.

Performing notarial acts without a commission violates more than just the Notarial Rules. It also breaches the Lawyer's Oath and the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR), particularly Canon 1 (upholding the law) and Canon 7 (maintaining the integrity of the legal profession).

Even a lawyer who notarizes a document as a favor, unaware that their commission has expired, can face disciplinary action. Good faith does not excuse the violation of these clear rules.

The Case: Javier v. Rivera

The complainant, Lazaro G. Javier, Jr., alleged that Atty. Carlos P. Rivera notarized eight documents between 2005 and 2006 without a valid commission. Javier supported his complaint with photocopies of the notarized documents and a certification from the Office of the Clerk of Court, Regional Trial Court, Tuguegarao City, confirming that Rivera had no commission during that period.

The procedural history is instructive:

  • The Supreme Court ordered Rivera to comment on the complaint, but he failed to comply despite multiple orders and fines.
  • When he finally filed a Comment, he claimed the complaint was motivated by leverage in other administrative cases.
  • The case was referred to the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) for investigation.
  • The IBP Commission on Bar Discipline initially recommended dismissal for insufficient evidence, but suggested a stern warning for non-compliance.
  • The IBP Board of Governors reversed this, recommending a one-year suspension, disqualification from notarial reappointment for two years, and a P10,000 fine for disobedience.

The Supreme Court agreed with the IBP-BOG. The Court held that by notarizing documents without a commission, Rivera violated his oath to obey Court issuances, the Notarial Rules, Canons 1 and 7 of the CPR, and the Notarial Act itself.

The Court emphasized that notarization converts private documents into public ones admissible in court, making it essential to the authenticity and reliability of legal transactions. It also considered Rivera's prior disciplinary history, including a previous suspension for a similar offense and a disbarment for simulating court documents.

Why This Matters for the Public

For ordinary individuals and businesses, this ruling is a practical reminder. A notarized document is only as valid as the notary's authority. If a notary lacks a commission, the notarization may be invalid, potentially affecting the enforceability of contracts, deeds, and other legal instruments.

Consider a business owner who secures a loan using a notarized agreement. If the notary's commission is later found to be invalid, the agreement's legal standing could be challenged, leading to significant financial setbacks.

Practical Takeaways

  • Verify before you notarize: Lawyers must confirm their notarial commission is current and valid before performing any notarial act.
  • Respond to Court orders: Failure to comply with Court or IBP directives can aggravate disciplinary penalties.
  • Know the rules: The 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice limit notarial authority to two years and to the territorial jurisdiction of the commissioning court.
  • Check your notary: Clients should verify that their notary public holds a valid commission, which can be confirmed with the Office of the Clerk of Court in the relevant region.
  • Ethics are non-negotiable: Violations of the Lawyer's Oath and the CPR carry severe consequences, including suspension and disbarment.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your situation, ask ASG Legal AI or book a consultation.