Nov 15, 2016election-lawcomelecappeal-feeselection-protestssupreme-court

Perfecting Appeals in Election Protests: Timely Payment of Appeal Fees

The Supreme Court clarifies the rules on appeal fees in election protests, emphasizing timely payment and the limits on damages.


The Supreme Court recently clarified the rules on perfecting appeals in election protest cases, particularly regarding the payment of appeal fees. In a consolidated decision, the Court addressed when an appeal to the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) is considered perfected and whether certain monetary awards are proper. This ruling provides important guidance for candidates and lawyers navigating election disputes.

The Facts of the Case

The case arose from the May 10, 2010 automated elections in Saint Bernard, Southern Leyte. Several candidates who lost in the elections for mayor, vice mayor, and members of the Sangguniang Bayan filed election protests before the Regional Trial Court (RTC). After trial, the RTC dismissed all three protests and ordered the losing candidates to pay moral damages and attorney's fees to the winning candidates.

The losing candidates appealed to the COMELEC. They filed their notices of appeal and paid the appeal fee to the RTC within the required period. However, the COMELEC First Division dismissed their appeals, ruling that they failed to pay the COMELEC appeal fee within the reglementary period. The COMELEC En Banc later denied their motions for reconsideration, declaring the appeals moot because the terms of the contested offices had already expired.

The Issue

The central issue was whether the petitioners perfected their appeals by timely paying the required appeal fees. A related issue was whether the expiration of the contested offices' terms rendered the appeals moot, particularly with respect to the monetary awards.

The Ruling: Payment of Appeal Fees

The Supreme Court ruled that the COMELEC erred in dismissing the appeals of two petitioners who timely paid their appeal fees. The Court clarified the applicable rules:

For municipal election contests, the 2010 Rules of Procedure in Election Contests before the Courts Involving Elective Municipal Officials (A.M. No. 10-4-1-SC) apply. Under these rules, an aggrieved party must file a notice of appeal within five days after promulgation of the decision and pay a P1,000.00 appeal fee to the trial court simultaneously with the filing.

For the COMELEC appeal fee, COMELEC Resolution No. 8486 governs. This resolution allows an appellant to pay the COMELEC appeal fee of P3,200.00 within 15 days from the filing of the notice of appeal with the trial court. The Court emphasized that this resolution remains applicable and effectively amended the earlier rule requiring payment within five days.

The Court also rejected the COMELEC's argument that its earlier ruling in Divinagracia v. COMELEC limited the application of Resolution No. 8486. The Court clarified that Divinagracia merely stated that errors in non-payment or incomplete payment of appeal fees would no longer be excused—it did not change the 15-day period for paying the COMELEC fee.

Applying these rules, the Court found that two petitioners who paid their COMELEC appeal fees within 15 days from filing their notices of appeal had duly perfected their appeals. However, the other petitioners who failed to pay their individual COMELEC appeal fees had their appeals properly dismissed.

The Ruling: Damages and Attorney's Fees

The Court also addressed the monetary awards. It ruled that the expiration of the contested offices' terms did not render the appeals moot because the issue of damages remained ripe for adjudication.

On the merits, the Court found the awards of moral damages improper. Under Section 259 of the Omnibus Election Code, only actual or compensatory damages may be granted in election contests. The Court noted that previous election codes expressly allowed moral and exemplary damages, but the current code deliberately omitted these provisions, showing legislative intent to limit damages.

The Court likewise found the award of attorney's fees unwarranted. While the rules allow attorney's fees if just and established by evidence, the respondents failed to adduce sufficient evidence to substantiate their claim. Being compelled to litigate does not, by itself, merit an award of attorney's fees.

Practical Takeaways

  • Know the deadlines: In election protests involving municipal officials, file the notice of appeal within five days from receipt of the decision and pay the P1,000.00 appeal fee to the trial court simultaneously.
  • COMELEC appeal fee: Pay the P3,200.00 COMELEC appeal fee within 15 days from filing the notice of appeal with the trial court, not within the initial five-day period.
  • Each appellant must pay: Every individual appellant must pay their own COMELEC appeal fee. Sharing or attaching another appellant's proof of payment is insufficient.
  • Damages are limited: In election contests, only actual or compensatory damages may be awarded under the Omnibus Election Code. Moral and exemplary damages are not allowed.
  • Expiration of term does not moot damages: Even if the contested office's term expires, the issue of monetary awards remains alive for adjudication.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your situation, ask ASG Legal AI or book a consultation.