Jul 15, 2009constitutional lawphilippine red crossgovernment-owned corporationssenatorspublic office

Philippine Red Cross Private Status and Constitutional Limits on Lawmakers

Supreme Court ruling on whether the Philippine Red Cross is a government corporation and the constitutional ban on lawmakers holding public office.


The Supreme Court's 2009 ruling in Liban v. Gordon settled two significant constitutional questions: whether the Philippine National Red Cross (PNRC) is a government-owned or controlled corporation, and whether a sitting senator may serve as its chairman without forfeiting his Senate seat. The case also clarified important limits on who may bring a quo warranto action against a public official.

The Dispute

Petitioners, officers of the Quezon City Red Cross Chapter, sought to have Senator Richard J. Gordon declared as having forfeited his Senate seat. Gordon had been elected Chairman of the PNRC Board of Governors in February 2006, during his incumbency as Senator. Petitioners argued that this violated Section 13, Article VI of the 1987 Constitution, which prohibits Senators and Members of the House of Representatives from holding any other office or employment in the Government, or any subdivision, agency, or instrumentality thereof, including government-owned or controlled corporations, during their term without forfeiting their seat.

The Issue

The central question was whether the office of PNRC Chairman is a government office or an office in a government-owned or controlled corporation for purposes of the constitutional prohibition. A related procedural question concerned whether the petitioners had legal standing to bring the case.

The Ruling

The Court dismissed the petition on two grounds. First, it held that the petitioners lacked standing. The petition was essentially an action for quo warranto, which under Rule 66 of the Rules of Court may only be brought by the Government or by a person claiming entitlement to the office in dispute. The petitioners did not claim to be entitled to Senator Gordon's seat.

Second, even treating the petition as a taxpayer's suit, the Court found no merit in the substantive claim. The Court ruled that the PNRC is a private organization performing public functions, not a government-owned or controlled corporation. The government does not own the PNRC, does not provide its funding through congressional appropriations, and does not control its operations. Only six of the thirty members of the PNRC Board of Governors are appointed by the President; the remaining twenty-four are elected or chosen by private sector members. The PNRC Chairman is elected by this private sector-controlled board, not appointed by the President or any government official.

The Court also emphasized the importance of the PNRC's autonomy, neutrality, and independence. As a member National Society of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, the PNRC must be seen as independent from government to effectively carry out its humanitarian mission, particularly in conflict areas.

A Significant Constitutional Finding

Notably, the Court went further and declared that the PNRC Charter, insofar as it created the PNRC as a private corporation with corporate powers, was void for being unconstitutional. The Constitution prohibits Congress from creating private corporations except by general law. Since the PNRC is a private corporation, it cannot be created by a special charter. The Court held that the PNRC should incorporate under the Corporation Code and register with the Securities and Exchange Commission if it wishes to operate as a private corporation.

Practical Takeaways

  • The constitutional ban on lawmakers holding other government positions applies only to offices in the Government, its subdivisions, agencies, or instrumentalities, including government-owned or controlled corporations. It does not apply to purely private positions.
  • A corporation is "government-owned or controlled" only if the government actually owns it (at least 51% of capital stock for stock corporations) or controls its membership or operations. Creation by special charter alone is not enough.
  • Only the Government or a person claiming entitlement to the office may bring a quo warranto action to challenge a public official's right to hold office.
  • The Red Cross, to maintain its effectiveness and neutrality, must remain genuinely independent from government control.
  • Congress cannot create private corporations through special charters; such corporations must be formed under general corporation laws.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your situation, ask ASG Legal AI or book a consultation.