Sep 5, 2018real property taxlocal government codetax liabilitybeneficial usephilippine supreme court

Real Property Tax: Who Pays When Ownership and Possession Differ

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies real property tax liability when the registered owner is not in possession, citing Herarc Realty v. Provincial Treasurer of Batangas.


The question of who must pay real property tax (RPT) can become complicated when the registered owner of a piece of land is not the one actually using or possessing it. A 2018 Supreme Court decision, Herarc Realty Corporation v. Provincial Treasurer of Batangas (G.R. No. 210736), clarifies this issue, ruling that the registered owner who is not tax-exempt remains personally liable for the tax even if another party had beneficial use of the property during the period in question.

The Facts of the Case

Herarc Realty Corporation acquired thirteen parcels of land in Calatagan, Batangas through an execution sale in August 2004. The properties were registered under Herarc's name in 2006. However, from March 2006 to August 2009, the land was in the actual possession of three individuals who were assignees in an insolvency proceeding against the previous owners. Herarc only took full possession of the property in August 2009 after securing a writ of execution.

In October 2012, the Provincial Treasurer of Batangas demanded payment of P8,093,256.89 in unpaid RPT for 2007, 2008, and part of 2009. Herarc paid under protest and filed a petition in court, arguing that the individuals who had actual possession during that period should be the ones liable for the tax.

The Issue

The central question was whether the registered owner, who was not in possession of the property when the tax accrued, could be held personally liable for the unpaid real property tax.

The Ruling

The Supreme Court denied Herarc's petition, holding that as the registered owner and a taxable entity, Herarc was personally liable for the RPT during the covered period.

The Court explained that in real estate taxation, the unpaid tax attaches to the property itself. The personal liability for the tax delinquency generally falls on whoever is the owner of the real property at the time the tax accrues. This is a necessary consequence of ownership.

The Court distinguished the cases Herarc relied upon, such as Testate Estate of Concordia T. Lim v. City of Manila. In those cases, the doctrine that the beneficial user is liable for the tax applied because the registered owner was a tax-exempt entity, such as the government. Under Section 234 of the Local Government Code, real property owned by the Republic is exempt from RPT, but this exemption ceases when the beneficial use is granted to a taxable person. In that situation, the taxable beneficial user becomes liable.

Herarc, however, was not a tax-exempt entity. It was a private corporation subject to tax. Therefore, the general rule applied: the registered owner is liable for the tax.

A Procedural Lesson

The Court also noted that Herarc erred in appealing the trial court's decision directly to the Supreme Court. Under Republic Act No. 9282, decisions of the Regional Trial Court in local tax cases should be appealed to the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA). Failure to follow the proper appellate procedure makes the assessment final, executory, and demandable.

Practical Takeaways

  • Ownership generally determines RPT liability. If you are the registered owner of real property, you are personally liable for the real property tax, regardless of who is actually using the property.
  • The beneficial-use rule has a limited scope. The rule that the beneficial user is liable for the tax applies mainly when the registered owner is a tax-exempt entity, such as the government, and the property's use has been granted to a taxable person.
  • Possession does not shift tax liability. Being out of possession of your own property does not automatically transfer your tax obligation to the possessor.
  • Follow the correct appeal process. In local tax cases, appeals from the Regional Trial Court must go to the Court of Tax Appeals. Failure to do so can make the tax assessment final and unassailable.
  • Pay under protest and act promptly. If you believe an assessment is erroneous, pay under protest and file the appropriate legal action within the prescribed periods to protect your rights.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your situation, ask ASG Legal AI or book a consultation.