Seafarer Disability Claims: The 120-240 Day Rule for Medical Assessments
Understand the 120-240 day rule for company-designated physician assessments in seafarer disability claims, explained through a 2018 Supreme Court ruling.
The Supreme Court's 2018 decision in Teekay Shipping Philippines, Inc. v. Ramoga clarifies a critical point for Filipino seafarers claiming permanent total disability benefits: the 120-day period for a company-designated physician to assess a seafarer's condition is not absolute. If the physician provides sufficient justification, that period can be extended to 240 days. This ruling helps define when a seafarer is truly entitled to permanent total disability benefits and when the employer's physician still has time to make a determination.
The Case: An Injury On Board
Roberto Ramoga, Jr. was hired as a Deck Trainee on the vessel M/T "SEBAROK SPIRIT" under an eight-month contract. After passing his pre-employment medical examination, he joined the vessel in April 2010. Barely six months later, he slipped and twisted his left ankle while climbing stairs on board. He was diagnosed with fractures in his foot and was repatriated to the Philippines on October 4, 2010.
The next day, he was referred to the Metropolitan Medical Center, where the company-designated physician, Dr. William Chuasuan, Jr., performed surgery on his foot. Ramoga underwent rehabilitation under the physician's care. On April 8, 2011—186 days after his repatriation—Dr. Chuasuan issued a certification declaring Ramoga fit to return to work.
Unsatisfied, Ramoga sought a second opinion. His own doctor declared him permanently unfit to resume sea duties due to persistent pain and inability to ambulate for long distances. Ramoga then filed a complaint for permanent total disability benefits.
The Issue: The 120-Day vs. 240-Day Rule
The central question was whether Ramoga was entitled to permanent total disability benefits. The Labor Arbiter and the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) ruled in his favor, and the Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed. The CA reasoned that because the company physician's certification was not categorical and Ramoga had not resumed work for more than 120 days from repatriation, his disability was permanent and total.
The Supreme Court, however, reversed these rulings. The Court explained that the 120-day period under the Labor Code is not a hard-and-fast deadline. It must be read together with the Amended Rules on Employees' Compensation, which allows an extension to 240 days if the injury or sickness still requires medical attendance beyond 120 days.
The Governing Guidelines
The Court applied the guidelines established in Elburg Shipmanagement Phils. Inc. v. Quiogue and Jebsens Maritime, Inc. v. Rapiz, which govern seafarer disability claims:
- The company-designated physician must issue a final medical assessment within 120 days from the time the seafarer reported to him.
- If the physician fails to give an assessment within 120 days without any justifiable reason, the seafarer's disability becomes permanent and total.
- If the physician fails to assess within 120 days with sufficient justification (e.g., the seafarer required further medical treatment or was uncooperative), the period extends to 240 days. The employer bears the burden of proving that justification.
- If the physician still fails to assess within the extended 240-day period, the disability becomes permanent and total, regardless of any justification.
Applying the Rule to the Facts
In Ramoga's case, the company-designated physician issued his fitness declaration on April 8, 2011—186 days after repatriation, which is beyond 120 days but within 240 days. The Court found sufficient justification for the extension. A medical report dated January 11, 2011 showed the physician advised Ramoga to continue rehabilitation, take medications, and return for a repeat x-ray and re-evaluation. This demonstrated that further medical treatment was needed, making it premature for Ramoga to file his claim on March 4, 2011.
The Court also emphasized that the assessment of the company-designated physician prevails over that of the seafarer's own doctor, as it is considered more credible for being based on months of medical attendance and diagnosis.
Practical Takeaways
- The 120-day period is not automatic grounds for a permanent total disability claim. The company physician can extend the assessment period to 240 days if there is a valid reason, such as ongoing treatment.
- The employer has the burden of proving that the extension is justified. A mere delay without explanation can result in a finding of permanent total disability.
- The company-designated physician's assessment generally prevails over a seafarer's private doctor, provided it is issued within the proper timeframe.
- Seafarers should cooperate with treatment and await the physician's final assessment before filing claims, unless the physician fails to act within the allowed periods.
This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.
This article is general information and not legal advice. For your situation, ask ASG Legal AI or book a consultation.