Jan 18, 2021legal ethicsnotarial practicenotary publicadministrative casesupreme courtdocument integrity

Notarial Duties and Document Integrity: Lessons from a Lawyer's Negligence

A lawyer's failure to record a notarized document in the notarial register leads to suspension and revocation of commission.


The Supreme Court's decision in De Vera v. Navarro (A.C. No. 12912, January 18, 2021) serves as a firm reminder that notarization is far more than a routine ministerial act. When a lawyer fails to record a notarized document in the notarial register, the consequences extend beyond administrative liability—they can undermine the very integrity of public documents and cause real harm to clients. This case illustrates why notaries public must treat every notarial act with the utmost care and fidelity.

The Facts of the Case

In 2007, Dolores De Vera and her husband Manuel sought the services of Atty. Cenon J. Navarro to prepare and notarize an Affidavit of Acknowledgment and Use of Surname. The affidavit was necessary so that their daughter, Donna Belle, could use her father's surname on her birth certificate.

Atty. Navarro notarized the affidavit on August 7, 2007. Years later, when Donna Belle needed a certified true copy of the affidavit for employment abroad, the family discovered a serious problem. The Office of the Clerk of Court of the Regional Trial Court of Malolos City issued a certification stating that the affidavit was not included in Atty. Navarro's notarial report for August 2007.

Despite Atty. Navarro's denial that he ever notarized the document, the original affidavit bore his notarial seal, notarial details, and signature. The IBP found his defenses unavailing, noting that if his signature were truly forged, it was curious how the complainant obtained the precise notarial details reflected on the document.

The Issue Before the Court

The sole issue was whether Atty. Navarro should be held administratively liable for his failure to record the notarized affidavit in his notarial register.

The Court's Ruling

The Supreme Court held Atty. Navarro guilty of violating the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice. He was suspended from the practice of law for six months, his notarial commission was immediately revoked, and he was disqualified from being commissioned as a notary public for two years.

In ruling against Atty. Navarro, the Court emphasized that the act of notarization is "imbued with substantive public interest." The notarial seal converts a private document into a public instrument, which may then be presented as evidence without need of proof of its genuineness and due execution. A notarized document is entitled to full faith and credit upon its face.

The Duty to Record Notarial Acts

Rule VI of the 2004 Rules on Notarial Practice explicitly requires notaries public to maintain a chronological official notarial register and to record every notarial act at the time of notarization. The register must include the entry number, date, type of notarial act, description of the document, names of the parties, and other relevant details.

The Court explained that a notary's failure to record a document in the notarial register "corresponds to falsely making it appear that the document was notarized when, in fact, it was not." When a document does not appear in the notarial records, doubt arises as to whether it was truly notarized—and it loses its character as a public document.

Practical Takeaways

  • Notarization carries heavy responsibilities. A notary public must observe utmost care in performing notarial duties to preserve public confidence in the integrity of notarized documents.
  • The notarial register is not optional. Every notarial act must be recorded at the time of notarization, with no blank lines left between entries. Failure to do so is a serious violation.
  • Notarial records protect clients. The failure to record a document can render it suspect and cause significant prejudice to clients who rely on it for legal or personal purposes.
  • Denials are not enough. A notary's bare denial of notarizing a document will not prevail where the document bears the notary's seal, signature, and notarial details.
  • Penalties are severe. Violations of the Notarial Rules can result in suspension from the practice of law, revocation of notarial commission, and disqualification from future commissions.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your situation, ask ASG Legal AI or book a consultation.