Oct 4, 2020prescriptionoral contractscivil codecollection of sum of moneysupreme court

Prescription Period for Oral Contracts: What Creditors and Debtors Must Know

The Supreme Court clarifies the six-year prescription period for oral contracts and why timely action is critical for creditors and debtors.


A verbal loan or credit arrangement can be convenient, but it carries a hidden risk: a shorter prescription period. In the Philippines, actions based on oral contracts must be filed within six years, while written contracts enjoy a longer ten-year window. The Supreme Court's ruling in a 2020 case illustrates how easily a creditor can lose the right to collect simply by waiting too long.

The Legal Framework: Six Years for Oral Contracts

Article 1145 of the Civil Code sets the prescription period for actions based on oral contracts at six years from the time the cause of action accrues. This is significantly shorter than the ten-year period for written contracts under Article 1144, underscoring the value of documentation.

Prescription is the time limit within which a lawsuit must be filed. For oral contracts, the clock begins when the cause of action arises—typically when a party breaches the agreement. In a loan context, this means when the debtor fails to pay on the agreed date.

Article 1150 clarifies that prescription runs from the moment the action may be brought, meaning when all elements of a cause of action are present: a right in favor of the plaintiff, a corresponding obligation on the defendant, and an act or omission by the defendant violating that right.

The Alba Case: A Cautionary Tale

Regina Alba sold petroleum products on credit to Nida Arollado starting in 2000. Arollado issued checks that were later dishonored. Despite demand letters and efforts to collect, Alba filed her collection case only after the six-year period had lapsed from the dishonor of the checks.

The Regional Trial Court initially ruled in Alba's favor, limiting liability to the value of the dishonored checks. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed, dismissing the case on the ground of prescription. The Supreme Court affirmed this dismissal.

The Court held that the dishonor of the checks constituted a breach of contract for non-payment, and it was at that moment the right to sue accrued. Significantly, the Court also ruled that alleged partial payments by the debtor did not interrupt prescription because they were not accompanied by a written acknowledgment of the debt. Under the Civil Code, only a written acknowledgment can interrupt the running of the prescription period.

When Does the Clock Start?

The key lesson from the case is precision in determining when the cause of action arises. For a loan payable on demand, the cause of action accrues upon demand and the debtor's failure to pay. For a loan with a fixed maturity date, the clock starts on the day after the due date. The creditor bears the burden of proving that the action was filed within the prescriptive period.

Partial Payments and Interruption of Prescription

Many creditors assume that any payment—even partial—resets the prescription clock. The Supreme Court's ruling clarifies that this is incorrect. A partial payment interrupts prescription only if it is coupled with a written acknowledgment of the debt signed by the debtor. An oral admission or an unaccompanied payment will not stop the running of the period.

Practical Takeaways

  • Document agreements in writing. A written contract extends the prescription period to ten years and provides clearer evidence of the terms.
  • Act promptly. Once a debt is unpaid and a cause of action arises, creditors should not delay. The six-year period for oral contracts passes quickly.
  • Obtain written acknowledgments. If a debtor makes partial payments, request a written acknowledgment of the outstanding balance to interrupt prescription.
  • Keep records. Maintain copies of demand letters, checks, payment receipts, and any written communications that may help establish the timeline.
  • For debtors, know the defense. Prescription is an affirmative defense that can dismiss stale claims, but settling debts promptly is still the safer course.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your situation, ask ASG Legal AI or book a consultation.