Jun 23, 2021inheritanceillegitimate childrenestate partitionsuccessioncivil code

Unlocking Inheritance Rights Understanding Illegitimate Childrens Entitlement TO Estate Partition IN THE Phili

The Supreme Court clarifies how illegitimate children inherit from their father's estate and when they can demand partition.


The Supreme Court recently clarified the inheritance rights of illegitimate children in a dispute over the estate of Donato Pacheco, Sr. In Rivera v. Villanueva (G.R. No. 197310, June 23, 2021), the Court ruled that acknowledged illegitimate children are entitled to their share of the estate, even if a partition was executed without their knowledge. The decision also settled how much illegitimate children receive compared to legitimate heirs under the Civil Code.

The Family Dispute

Donato Pacheco, Sr. was legally married to Anatacia Santos, with whom he had two legitimate children: Emerenciana and Milagros. During his marriage, Donato also had an illicit relationship with Emiliana dela Cruz, and they had four children together: Flora, Donato Jr., Ruperto, and Virgilio.

When Donato died intestate in 1956, his legitimate children executed an extrajudicial partition of his properties, claiming to be the sole heirs. The illegitimate children were excluded. Decades later, they filed a complaint for partition, seeking their rightful shares of the estate.

The Issue Before the Court

The central question was whether the illegitimate children could still demand partition of the estate despite the extrajudicial settlement made by the legitimate children in 1956. The petitioners argued that the action had prescribed and that the partition was valid.

The Ruling

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the illegitimate children. The Court held that an extrajudicial settlement is not binding on heirs who did not participate in it or had no notice of it. Since the illegitimate children had no knowledge of the partition, they were not bound by it.

The Court also addressed the prescription issue. Under Article 494 of the Civil Code, no prescription runs in favor of a co-owner or co-heir against other co-owners or co-heirs as long as the co-ownership is recognized. The legitimate children never repudiated the co-ownership, so the action for partition did not prescribe.

The Share of Illegitimate Children

The Court clarified the share of illegitimate children under the Civil Code, which applied because Donato died in 1956. Under Article 895, the legitime of an acknowledged natural child is one-half of the legitime of a legitimate child. However, children born from an adulterous relationship—like the respondents here—are not "natural children." Their share is only four-fifths (4/5) of the legitime of an acknowledged natural child.

This means that each illegitimate child in this case receives 4/5 of one-half of the legitime of a legitimate child. The Court corrected the lower courts' error in awarding them a full one-half share.

Accounting of Income

The Court also ruled on the reckoning period for accounting income from the estate properties. Since rights to succession are transmitted from the moment of death under Article 777 of the Civil Code, the accounting should be reckoned from Donato's death in 1956, not from the filing of the complaint in 1991. The heirs who managed the properties must account for the income derived from them since that time.

Practical Takeaways

  • An extrajudicial settlement of estate is not binding on heirs who did not participate in it or had no notice of it. Excluded heirs can still demand their share.
  • Actions for partition among co-heirs do not prescribe as long as the co-ownership is recognized and not repudiated.
  • The share of illegitimate children depends on the law in effect at the time of the decedent's death. For deaths before the Family Code took effect, the Civil Code rules apply.
  • Children born from adulterous relationships receive 4/5 of the legitime of an acknowledged natural child, not the full share of a legitimate child.
  • Heirs who manage estate properties must account for income from the date of the decedent's death, not merely from the filing of a court case.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your situation, ask ASG Legal AI or book a consultation.