Apr 27, 2022maritime-lawseafarer-rightsdisability-benefitspoea-secpermanent-total-disabilitycompany-designated-physician

Untimely Medical Assessments Protecting Seafarers Rights TO Disability Benefits

When company doctors miss the deadline for a final assessment, a seafarer's disability is deemed permanent and total.


The Supreme Court's ruling in Skanfil Maritime Services, Inc. v. Centeno (G.R. No. 227655, April 27, 2022) clarifies a crucial protection for Filipino seafarers: when a company-designated physician fails to issue a final and definitive medical assessment within the prescribed period, the seafarer's disability is automatically considered permanent and total. The decision also underscores that vague medical reports and certificates of fitness signed by the seafarer himself cannot defeat a claim for disability benefits.

The Facts of the Case

In March 2013, Almario Centeno was hired as a mess person aboard M/V "DIMI" POS TOPAS. On September 26, 2013, he fell from a seven-step ladder, losing consciousness and bleeding from the back of the head. He was diagnosed with blunt head and back injuries, a lacerated scalp wound, and brain concussion. On October 2, 2013, he was repatriated to the Philippines.

Centeno was referred to the company-designated physicians, who treated him for a fractured sacrum and a mild disc bulge. During treatment, one company doctor issued an interim assessment of Grade 8 disability. After weeks of therapy, the orthopedic surgeon cleared Centeno, and the neurosurgeon likewise cleared him. On February 7, 2014—eight days beyond the 120-day period from repatriation—the company doctor issued a "10th and Final Report." On the same date, Centeno signed a Certificate of Fitness for Work, which the company doctor signed only as a witness.

Unconvinced, Centeno consulted his own physician, who declared him permanently unfit for sea duties. Centeno then filed a complaint for permanent disability benefits.

The Issue

The central question was whether Centeno was entitled to permanent total disability benefits despite the company-designated physicians' eventual clearance.

The Ruling: A Late and Vague Assessment is No Assessment at All

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Centeno, applying the well-established rules from Elburg Shipmanagement Phils., Inc. v. Quioge, Jr. (765 Phil. 341 [2015]):

  • The company-designated physician must issue a final medical assessment within 120 days from the seafarer's repatriation.
  • If no assessment is issued within 120 days without justifiable reason, the disability becomes permanent and total.
  • The period may be extended to 240 days only with sufficient justification, and the employer bears the burden of proving that justification.

Here, the 10th and Final Report was issued on February 7, 2014—eight days beyond the 120-day deadline. The company failed to justify the delay. The Court noted that the physicians did not explain the progress of treatment or why an extension was warranted.

The Report Was Not Final or Definitive

Even if timely, the 10th and Final Report was fatally vague. It stated that Centeno was cleared orthopedic-wise and advised proper back mechanics to prevent or minimize recurrence of his back pain. Citing Lemoncito v. BSM Crew Service Centre Philippines, Inc. (G.R. No. 247409, February 3, 2020), the Court held that such generic statements do not constitute a definitive assessment of fitness to work.

The Certificate of Fitness for Work was likewise rejected. The certificate was executed by Centeno—a seafarer with no medical expertise—and the company doctor signed only as a witness, not as a physician. The Court treated it as a quitclaim that could not bind the seafarer.

Because there was no valid medical assessment to contest, the Court held that Centeno was not even required to refer the case to a third doctor under the conflict-resolution mechanism of the 2010 POEA-SEC.

Damages and Attorney's Fees

The Court deleted the awards for moral and exemplary damages, finding no evidence of bad faith or fraud—only a genuine difference of medical opinion. However, it retained the award of attorney's fees under Article 2208(8) of the Civil Code, and imposed 6% legal interest per annum on the total award.

Practical Takeaways

  • The 120-day rule is strict. Company-designated physicians must issue a final, definitive assessment within 120 days from repatriation, unless a justifiable extension is properly documented.
  • Vague reports do not count. A report that merely states a seafarer is "cleared" without a categorical statement of fitness—or that still recommends further treatment—is incomplete and will be disregarded.
  • A seafarer's own "certificate of fitness" is not conclusive. Such documents, especially when signed by the seafarer and merely witnessed by a doctor, carry little weight.
  • Employers bear the burden of proof. If the assessment is late, the employer must justify the delay; otherwise, the seafarer's disability is deemed permanent and total.
  • No third-doctor referral is needed without a valid assessment. The conflict-resolution mechanism only applies when there is a definitive company assessment to contest.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your specific situation, consult a lawyer or ask ASG Legal AI.

This article is general information and not legal advice. For your situation, ask ASG Legal AI or book a consultation.