From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 289–312 of 532 articles for “judges”

Judges Must Control Court Proceedings and Resolve Cases Promptly: A Lesson from A.M. No. 03-10-250-MCTC

A Supreme Court ruling reminds judges they cannot delegate control of court proceedings to clerks or litigants, and must resolve cases promptly.

Judicial Ethics Substantiating Claims OF Bribery Against Judges

When Retired Judges Decide Cases: Why Those Rulings Are Void

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that decisions rendered or promulgated after a judge's retirement are null and void, with administrative liability.

Judicial Accountability: The Duty to Decide Cases on Time and the Cost of Delay

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on judges' duty to decide cases within 90 days, and the administrative penalty for unjustified delay.

Judicial Conduct When Judges Actions Create AN Appearance OF Impropriety

When Judges Overstep: The Cash Bond Rule and Simple Misconduct

A judge who personally received a cash bail bond violated Rule 114, but the Court ruled it was simple, not gross, misconduct.

Judicial Immunity Shielding Judges From Baseless Administrative Complaints

When can judges be disciplined for erroneous rulings? The Supreme Court clarifies judicial immunity and the limits of administrative complaints.

Retirement Benefits and Special Allowances: When the Law's Date of Implementation Controls

Explaining when special allowances for judges count toward retirement benefits, based on a 2004 Supreme Court ruling on R.A. 9227.

Judicial Conduct and Dismissal: The Consequences of Gross Ignorance of the Law for Judges

A judge who flouts rules on preliminary investigation and bail faces dismissal. This case explains why.

Judicial Responsibility: Timely Decisions and Accountability for Delays

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on judges' duty to decide cases promptly, and accountability for undue delay.

Executive Judge Fined for Overstepping Authority in Cases Pending Before Lower Court

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies that executive judges cannot issue orders in cases pending before lower courts, even with good intentions.

Grave Threats Case: Why Judges Must Apply Summary Procedure Correctly

In Riño v. Cawaling, the Supreme Court fined a judge for gross ignorance of the law in misapplying summary procedure in a grave threats case.

When Workplace Conduct Disrupts Justice: Defining the Boundaries of Discourtesy in Philippine Courts

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when loud office chatter becomes administrative discourtesy, and why judges cannot suspend court staff without proper authority.

Judicial Accountability A Judges Failure TO Follow Procedural Rules AND ITS Impact ON Public Trust

When Judges Err in Good Faith: The Limits of Administrative Liability

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that judges acting in good faith are not administratively liable for legal errors, but discourtesy to lawyers remains misconduct.

Judges Must Supervise Court Personnel and Ensure Prompt Case Resolution

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on judicial responsibility, docket inventory duties, and accountability for court personnel negligence.

Breach OF Trust A Judges Duty IN Handling Cash Bail AND THE Anti Graft LAW

Judicial Ethics: Judges Must Avoid Influencing Cases Pending in Other Courts

A Supreme Court ruling reminds judges that trying to sway the outcome of a case pending in another court violates judicial ethics, even without malice or bad faith.

Upholding Judicial Ethics: Gross Immorality and the Price of Private Misconduct

The Supreme Court dismissed a judge for gross immorality over an extramarital affair, clarifying ethical standards for judges and lawyers.

When Judges Fail the Bar: Default Orders and the Duty to Notify

A judge's failure to furnish defaulted parties with court orders violates judicial conduct rules, resulting in a fine.

Upholding Judicial Integrity: The Limits of Administrative Complaints Against Judges

The Supreme Court clarifies when administrative complaints against judges proceed despite withdrawal, and distinguishes venue in criminal versus civil cases.

Detailing Municipal Employees to Courts: Limits of Executive Judge Authority

Supreme Court clarifies when executive judges may detail personnel to courts, and why municipal employees cannot serve as sheriffs.

Setting Bail Judges Must Consider Offenders Finances

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on bail discretion, judicial misconduct, and the duty of judges to resist pressure when setting bail.

Accountability Unbarred: Can Lawyers Face Discipline for Past Actions?

Supreme Court rules lawyers may face discipline for misconduct committed long ago, even after becoming judges or retiring.