From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 337–360 of 532 articles for “judges”

Sort:Newest Oldest

Aug 20, 2003 judicial ethics speedy disposition code of judicial conduct administrative liability rule 140

Judicial Efficiency Imperative Resolving Cases Within Prescribed Deadlines

Why Philippine judges must resolve cases within constitutional deadlines, and the consequences of delay, explained through a Supreme Court ruling.

Aug 18, 2003 judicial conduct undue delay 90-day rule administrative liability code of judicial conduct

Undue Delay in Rendering Decisions: A Judge's Administrative Liability

Learn how the Supreme Court penalizes judges for undue delay in deciding cases, and what the 90-day rule means for litigants.

Aug 6, 2003 judicial ethics administrative case session hours case delays judges philippines

Upholding Judicial Efficiency: Judges Must Observe Session Hours and Avoid Unnecessary Delays

Supreme Court admonishes judge for absenteeism and delays, reaffirming strict session hours and prompt case disposition as judicial duties.

Jul 31, 2003 judicial ethics undue delay certificate of service administrative law code of judicial conduct speedy disposition

Upholding Accountability: The Duty of Judges to Resolve Cases Promptly

A Supreme Court ruling on judicial delay in resolving a formal offer of exhibits, and the limits of liability for inaccurate certificates of service.

Jul 31, 2003 administrative case process server summons rules of court court personnel civil procedure

When Court Personnel Fail: Administrative Liability for Delayed Summons Service

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on process servers, clerks of court, and judges liable for delayed summons service in civil cases.

Jul 10, 2003 judicial accountability legal ethics administrative complaint indirect contempt rule 140

Judicial Accountability: Dismissal of Charges Requires Evidence Beyond Bare Allegations

Administrative complaints against judges must rest on competent evidence, not suspicion. The Supreme Court's ruling in Mijares clarifies when judges may be held liable.

Jul 10, 2003 administrative law judges judicial ethics indirect contempt legal ethics

Administrative Liability of Judges: Errors of Judgment vs. Misconduct

Explaining when judges face administrative liability for legal errors, citing the dismissal of charges against Judge Legaspi.

Jun 26, 2003 administrative-law judicial-ethics preliminary-injunction gross-ignorance-of-law due-process

Judge Not Liable for Denying Motion to Dissolve Writ: Administrative Case Dismissed

Supreme Court clarifies when judges may face administrative liability for erroneous orders, dismissing complaint against Baguio RTC judge.

Jun 26, 2003 judicial accountability administrative law gross ignorance of the law judge discipline preliminary injunction philippine supreme court

When Can a Judge Be Disciplined for an Erroneous Ruling? Lessons from De Guzman v. Pamintuan

The Supreme Court clarifies that judges are not automatically disciplined for every erroneous ruling—only for errors tainted by bad faith, fraud, malice, or dishonesty.

Jun 19, 2003 judicial ethics marriage license administrative case family law supreme court ruling

Judicial Accountability: Signing Marriage Contracts Without Licenses Is Negligence

Philippine Supreme Court holds judges liable for signing marriage contracts without licenses, ruling it constitutes gross negligence in judicial duties.

Jun 18, 2003 rape due process criminal procedure fair trial rules of court supreme court

Rape and Due Process: Fair Trial Rights in Philippine Rape Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies how trial judges may question witnesses in rape cases without violating the accused's right to a fair trial.

Jun 17, 2003 judicial delay administrative case judges speedy disposition code of judicial conduct

Judicial Delay: A Judge's Duty to Decide Cases on Time and Uphold Public Trust

The Supreme Court holds judges accountable for undue delay in deciding cases, reaffirming the constitutional mandate for timely justice and public confidence in the judiciary.

Jun 17, 2003 legal-ethics

Judicial Ethics Judges Must Uphold Impartiality AND Avoid Appearance OF Impropriety

Apr 30, 2003 judicial accountability administrative law rule 140 judge good faith delay

Judicial Accountability: Good Faith and Protecting Judges From Baseless Claims

A look at Custodio v. Quitain on judicial accountability, good faith, and protecting judges from baseless administrative claims.

Apr 30, 2003 judicial ethics undue delay administrative sanctions rule 140 speedy trial judges

Undue Delay in Resolving Motions: A Judge's Administrative Liability

The Supreme Court clarifies that judges who unreasonably delay resolving motions face administrative sanctions under Rule 140, even without a specific reglementary period.

Apr 30, 2003 judicial ethics administrative case customs jurisdiction temporary restraining order gross misconduct supreme court

Upholding Ethical Standards in Court Liability for Discourtesy, Negligence, and Premature Judgments

A Supreme Court ruling on judicial misconduct in issuing TROs over customs seizure cases, reinforcing ethical standards for judges.

Apr 25, 2003 judicial accountability gross ignorance of the law supreme court circular no. 3-89 administrative law judges criminal jurisdiction

Judicial Accountability When Misinterpreting Circulars Leads to Liability

Supreme Court clarifies that Circular No. 3-89 covers only administrative cases, not criminal cases against judges; a judge's misinterpretation can result in administrative liability.

Apr 22, 2003 legal-ethics judicial-efficiency administrative-case judges rule-140

Judicial Efficiency Mandate: A Judge's Duty to Resolve Motions Promptly

Supreme Court holds judges must resolve motions within prescribed periods; lack of personnel is no excuse for delay.

Apr 9, 2003 judicial ethics notarization ex officio notary supreme court administrative liability

Judicial Accountability When Judges Notarize Outside Their Authority

A Supreme Court ruling reminds judges that the power to notarize ex officio is narrow, and that notarizing a document without the affiant present is a serious breach.

Apr 9, 2003 administrative-law

Judicial Misconduct When Notarization Exceeds A Judges Authority

Apr 3, 2003 administrative law due process judicial accountability court personnel oca supreme court

Judicial Accountability When Judges Overstep Supervisory Bounds and Circumvent Due Process

A Supreme Court ruling on when reprimanding a complainant violates due process, and why withdrawing an administrative complaint does not end the case.

Apr 1, 2003 criminal procedure provisional dismissal rule 117 judicial efficiency due process supreme court

Judicial Efficiency vs Protracted Delay: The Duty of Judges to Resolve Motions Promptly

The Supreme Court clarifies that provisional dismissal of criminal cases requires the accused's express consent and notice to offended parties.

Mar 28, 2003 judicial accountability unjust judgment good faith defense administrative complaint judges philippine law

Judicial Accountability and the Good Faith Defense Against Unjust Judgment Charges

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that judges cannot be held administratively liable for erroneous rulings made in good faith, absent malice or bad faith.

Mar 28, 2003 criminal law libel preliminary investigation judicial ethics administrative case rpc article 360

Judicial Overreach Limits MCTC Authority in Libel Cases

The Supreme Court reminds judges that only specific courts may conduct preliminary investigations in libel cases under Article 360.