From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 337–360 of 544 articles for “judges”

Moral Turpitude and Professional Responsibility: When a Lawyer's Personal Conduct Affects Their Career

Philippine Supreme Court suspends lawyer for two years for immorality and for creating the appearance of influencing judges.

Exhaustion of Judicial Remedies Before Administrative Complaints Against Judges

Philippine doctrine: administrative complaints against judges for unjust judgments require prior exhaustion of judicial remedies like appeal or certiorari.

Neglect of Duty: Accountability for Process Servers in the Philippine Judiciary

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies the difference between simple and gross neglect of duty for court process servers, and the limits of executive judges' disciplinary powers.

Judicial Misconduct: Court Fines Retired Judge for Gross Inefficiency

Supreme Court holds retired judges accountable for gross inefficiency, imposing fines deductible from retirement benefits.

Judicial Discretion in Voluntary Inhibition and Maintaining Impartiality in Philippine Courts

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when judges may voluntarily inhibit from cases and why doing so protects judicial impartiality and public trust.

Judges Fined for Undue Delay in Resolving Motions: A Lesson in Judicial Efficiency

The Supreme Court fined a judge P11,000 for failing to resolve a motion within the 90-day reglementary period, underscoring the duty of judges to act promptly.

Promptness and Truthfulness: Disciplining Judges for Delays and False Certifications

Philippine Supreme Court rulings on disciplining judges for delayed decisions and false certifications of service.

Judicial Authority and Preliminary Investigations: Balancing Power and Procedure

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that municipal trial court judges may conduct preliminary investigations, and errors in judgment alone do not warrant administrative liability.

Judicial Efficiency Imperative Resolving Cases Within Prescribed Deadlines

Why Philippine judges must resolve cases within constitutional deadlines, and the consequences of delay, explained through a Supreme Court ruling.

Undue Delay in Rendering Decisions: A Judge's Administrative Liability

Learn how the Supreme Court penalizes judges for undue delay in deciding cases, and what the 90-day rule means for litigants.

Upholding Judicial Efficiency: Judges Must Observe Session Hours and Avoid Unnecessary Delays

Supreme Court admonishes judge for absenteeism and delays, reaffirming strict session hours and prompt case disposition as judicial duties.

When Court Personnel Fail: Administrative Liability for Delayed Summons Service

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on process servers, clerks of court, and judges liable for delayed summons service in civil cases.

Upholding Accountability: The Duty of Judges to Resolve Cases Promptly

A Supreme Court ruling on judicial delay in resolving a formal offer of exhibits, and the limits of liability for inaccurate certificates of service.

Judicial Accountability: Dismissal of Charges Requires Evidence Beyond Bare Allegations

Administrative complaints against judges must rest on competent evidence, not suspicion. The Supreme Court's ruling in Mijares clarifies when judges may be held liable.

Administrative Liability of Judges: Errors of Judgment vs. Misconduct

Explaining when judges face administrative liability for legal errors, citing the dismissal of charges against Judge Legaspi.

When Can a Judge Be Disciplined for an Erroneous Ruling? Lessons from De Guzman v. Pamintuan

The Supreme Court clarifies that judges are not automatically disciplined for every erroneous ruling—only for errors tainted by bad faith, fraud, malice, or dishonesty.

Judge Not Liable for Denying Motion to Dissolve Writ: Administrative Case Dismissed

Supreme Court clarifies when judges may face administrative liability for erroneous orders, dismissing complaint against Baguio RTC judge.

Judicial Accountability: Signing Marriage Contracts Without Licenses Is Negligence

Philippine Supreme Court holds judges liable for signing marriage contracts without licenses, ruling it constitutes gross negligence in judicial duties.

Rape and Due Process: Fair Trial Rights in Philippine Rape Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies how trial judges may question witnesses in rape cases without violating the accused's right to a fair trial.

Judicial Due Diligence: A Judge's Duty to Review Decisions Prepared by Others

The Supreme Court reminds judges that signing a decision drafted by court staff without reviewing it is gross inefficiency, even if the judgment itself is valid.

Judicial Delay: A Judge's Duty to Decide Cases on Time and Uphold Public Trust

The Supreme Court holds judges accountable for undue delay in deciding cases, reaffirming the constitutional mandate for timely justice and public confidence in the judiciary.

Judicial Ethics Judges Must Uphold Impartiality AND Avoid Appearance OF Impropriety

Judicial Accountability: Good Faith and Protecting Judges From Baseless Claims

A look at Custodio v. Quitain on judicial accountability, good faith, and protecting judges from baseless administrative claims.

Upholding Ethical Standards in Court Liability for Discourtesy, Negligence, and Premature Judgments

A Supreme Court ruling on judicial misconduct in issuing TROs over customs seizure cases, reinforcing ethical standards for judges.