From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 25–29 of 29 articles for “administrative sanctions”

Sort:Newest Oldest

Mar 20, 2001 judicial ethics administrative sanctions gross inefficiency speedy disposition judges rule 110

Judges Must Resolve Cases Within 90 Days or Face Administrative Sanctions

Supreme Court reminds judges to decide cases within 90 days, penalizing delay with fines for gross inefficiency.

Mar 20, 2001 legal-ethics

Judicial Efficiency Judges Must Resolve Cases Promptly OR Face Administrative Sanctions

Aug 11, 1999 ejectment summary procedure judicial delay administrative case mtcc supreme court

Ejectment Case Delays and Summary Procedure: A Lesson from the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court reminds judges that ejectment cases must be decided within 30 days under the Summary Procedure, or face administrative sanctions.

Aug 11, 1997 criminal-law gross-ignorance-of-law judicial-ethics administrative-case sentencing revised-penal-code

Gross Ignorance of the Law: When Judges Overstep Their Authority

A Supreme Court ruling on when a judge's sentencing errors become gross ignorance of the law warranting administrative sanctions.

Jul 28, 1997 judicial delay administrative law judges case deadlines supreme court

Judicial Delay Consequences for Judges Failing to Meet Deadlines in the Philippines

Philippine judges face administrative sanctions for failing to decide cases within the reglementary period. This article explains the rules and consequences.