From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 25–48 of 250 articles for “counsel”

Lawyers Barred From Lupon Proceedings: A Reminder on Barangay Justice Integrity

SC reprimands lawyer for appearing in barangay conciliation proceedings, affirming the mandatory ban on counsel under the Katarungang Pambarangay Law.

Upholding Ethical Conduct Attorney Suspended For Harassment And Misrepresentation

The Supreme Court suspends a lawyer for two years for harassing opposing counsel, misrepresenting facts, and attributing unsupported motives to a judge.

Upholding Judicial Conduct: Lawyers Must Show Courtesy and Punctuality for Fair Justice

A lawyer's two-year suspension for harassing judges and opposing counsel underscores the ethical limits of zealous advocacy in Philippine courts.

Disrespecting the Court: Fine for Counsel Who Blamed Justices for Own Errors

The Supreme Court fined a lawyer and his client for contempt after they accused the Court of negligence over their own procedural lapses.

Contempt of Court and the Limits of Reconsideration: Lessons from Fortune Life Insurance v. COA

The Supreme Court penalizes a litigant and counsel for disrespectful language in pleadings and clarifies the strict rules on second motions for reconsideration.

Client Bound by Counsel's Negligence? SC Relaxes Rules in Pontillas Construction Dispute

Supreme Court reminds courts that procedural rules serve justice, not hinder it, in a case involving counsel's lapses.

When Counsel's Negligence Costs the Appeal: Lessons from Dimaandal v. Ilagan

A client is bound by counsel's mistakes unless gross negligence deprives them of due process. The Supreme Court explains the rule.

When a "Lawyer" Is Not a Lawyer: Due Process and the Right to Counsel in Criminal Cases

The Supreme Court voids a conviction where the accused was represented by a fake lawyer, stressing the absolute right to counsel.

When a Fake Lawyer Represented the Accused: Due Process and the Right to Counsel

The Supreme Court voids a conviction where the accused was represented by a non-lawyer, reaffirming the absolute right to counsel.

Right to Counsel in Criminal Cases: Conviction Void When "Lawyer" Is Not a Bar Member

When a criminal defendant is represented by someone who is not a lawyer, the conviction violates due process and must be set aside.

Right to Counsel in Criminal Cases: When a Fake Lawyer Means Denial of Due Process

The Supreme Court ruled that conviction is void when an accused is represented by a non-lawyer, as it violates the constitutional right to counsel.

Lawyers Reprimanded for Unfounded Accusations in Pleadings: A Lesson in Professional Conduct

Philippine Supreme Court disciplines lawyers for baseless accusations against opposing counsel in pleadings, reaffirming ethical duties under the Code of Professional Responsibility.

Negligence vs Intent: When a Lawyer's Careless Accommodation Becomes Misconduct

The Supreme Court distinguishes negligence from intentional misconduct in Cruz v. Reyes, reprimanding a lawyer for careless accommodation of another counsel's requests.

Patent Revival and Due Diligence: The Consequences of Negligence in Intellectual Property Rights

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies that negligence by a patent applicant's counsel binds the client, and revival of abandoned applications may be barred by third-party rights and public interest.

Counsel's Negligence in Appeals: When a Client Is Bound by a Lawyer's Lapses

A missed deadline for an appellant's brief can end an appeal. Philippine Supreme Court explains when clients are bound by counsel's negligence.

When Counsel's Negligence Binds the Client: Appeals to the Commission on Audit

The Supreme Court clarifies that a client is bound by counsel's negligence in COA appeals, absent diligent follow-up.

Water Rights AND Corporate Counsel Ensuring Regulatory Compliance IN Water USE

When Court Notices Must Reach the Lawyer: Cervantes v. City Service Corporation

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies that procedural deadlines run from counsel's receipt of notice, not the client's, in NLRC cases.

Counsel Negligence and Client Responsibility: When Procedural Dismissals Stand in Philippine Courts

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when a client is bound by counsel's negligence and why dismissal for failure to prosecute is a final, appealable order.

BSP Can Use Private Counsel: Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction and Representation Rules

Supreme Court rules on BSP's authority to engage private counsel and RTC jurisdiction over real property disputes.

BSP Authority to Engage Private Counsel and Jurisdiction in Legal Proceedings

Supreme Court clarifies BSP's power to hire private counsel and RTC jurisdiction over real property cases involving assessed value.

Court of Appeals Erred in Dismissing Case Against Monzon: Jurisdiction Acquired Through Counsel

Supreme Court rules CA acquired jurisdiction over respondent through service to counsel of record, reversing dismissal order.

Disbarment for Forgery and Misrepresentation in Marriage Nullity Case

Supreme Court disbars lawyer who filed nullity petition without client's consent, forged signature, and misrepresented herself as counsel.

Annulment of Judgment: When a Final Court Decision Cannot Be Undone

The Supreme Court explains the strict limits of annulment of judgment, including what counts as extrinsic fraud and why counsel's negligence is not enough.