From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 25–48 of 58 articles for “demolition”

Demolition and Due Process: Understanding Nuisance Per Se in Philippine Law

When can government demolish property without court order? The Supreme Court explains nuisance per se, police power, and the limits of due process.

Sheriffs Authority Limits and Liabilities in Property Demolition in the Philippines

When can a sheriff demolish property during execution? The Supreme Court clarifies the limits of a sheriff's authority and liability in demolition cases.

Sheriffs Must Obey Court Orders: Due Process in Implementing Writs of Demolition

A sheriff who proceeds with demolition despite a court order to defer commits simple misconduct. Learn the rules from Gonzales v. Cabigao.

Sheriffs Authority Exercising DUE Care IN Demolition Orders TO Protect Third Party Rights

When Court Orders Are Enforced: Liability of Judges and Sheriffs in Demolition Cases

Explaining when judges and sheriffs can be held administratively liable for enforcing writs of demolition, based on a 2006 Supreme Court ruling.

Demolition of Illegal Structures: When a Court Order Is Required in the Philippines

Philippine law generally requires a special court order before a city may demolish existing structures, even those built without permits. Learn the rules.

Sheriff Misconduct and Illegal Demolition: Upholding Due Process in Philippine Law

When can a sheriff demolish structures not named in a writ? The Supreme Court clarifies due process limits on demolition orders.

Upholding Procedural Rules: Why Filing Deadlines Matter in Appeals

A Supreme Court ruling shows why missed appeal deadlines and improper certiorari petitions can lead to immediate eviction and demolition.

When Final Is Final: Ejectment Orders and Socialized Housing Claims

The Supreme Court upheld an ejectment and demolition order, ruling that a lost appeal cannot be replaced by certiorari and that RA 7279 protections require proof of beneficiary status.

Sheriffs and Public Trust: When a Court Officer Stands By and Does Nothing

A Supreme Court ruling shows that a sheriff's silence during an irregular demolition was neglect of duty, not innocence, and that court officers must act above suspicion.

Demolition Orders and Property Rights: Balancing Possession and Due Process in Unlawful Detainer Cases

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on demolition orders in unlawful detainer cases, protecting property rights and due process.

Sheriffs' Duty to Execute Court Orders Promptly and Consequences of Dereliction

A sheriff's failure to implement a writ of demolition without delay constitutes dereliction of duty, warranting administrative penalties.

Procedural Technicalities vs Substantial Justice: Court Rules in Demolition Cases

How a judge's failure to meet the 90-day decision period in demolition cases led to administrative liability and a fine.

Sheriff's Duty of Diligence Over Personal Property During Demolition

The Supreme Court fined a deputy sheriff P5,000 for failing to safeguard a occupant's belongings hauled away during a court-ordered demolition.

Supervisory Negligence: When Court Officials Are Liable for Delayed Writs

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies liability of sheriffs and clerks of court for unreasonable delay in implementing writs of demolition.

When a Caretaker's Demolition Becomes Malicious Mischief: Valeroso v. People

A caretaker demolished a squatter's hut to protect his employer's lot. The Supreme Court explains why this was malicious mischief, not a lawful act.

Ejectment Suits and Due Process: When Non-Parties Are Bound by Court Decisions

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when non-parties to an ejectment case may still be bound by a demolition order.

Ejectment and Due Process: When Occupants Become Parties in Forcible Entry Cases

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on whether occupants not named as defendants in forcible entry cases are bound by execution and demolition orders.

Sheriff's Duty on Execution Expenses: Proper Handling of Funds and Court Orders

A sheriff's failure to follow Rule 141 procedures for execution expenses and implement demolition orders results in administrative liability.

Sheriffs Held Accountable for Neglecting Writs of Demolition

Philippine Supreme Court rules sheriffs must implement writs promptly; delays and procedural shortcuts draw fines for dereliction of duty.

Sheriff's Demolition Duty Requires a Special Court Order

A sheriff cannot demolish structures under a writ of execution without a special court order. This case explains the rule.

Sheriffs' Duty to Execute Court Orders: Balancing Diligence and Due Process

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies sheriffs' duty to promptly execute writs of demolition, balancing enforcement with respect for due process.

When a Sheriff's Demolition Violates Due Process: Lessons from Biscocho v. Marero

A sheriff demolished homes of non-parties to an ejectment case. The Supreme Court ruled this was grave misconduct violating due process.

The Limits of Property Rights: Ensuring Due Process in Demolition Cases

A judge's 20-day ex parte TRO violated due process. Learn the rules on temporary restraining orders in property disputes.