From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 25–42 of 42 articles for “fidelity”

Psychological Incapacity in the Philippines: Why Navales v. Navales Set a Higher Bar

In Navales v. Navales, the Supreme Court reversed a declaration of nullity and reminded courts that psychological incapacity requires grave, incurable incapacity, not mere infidelity.

Moral Turpitude AND Attorney Discipline Infidelity AS Grounds FOR Suspension

Psychological Incapacity Mere Marital Infidelity IS NOT Enough FOR Annulment

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that psychological incapacity under Article 36 requires more than mere marital infidelity or irreconcilable differences.

Attorney Negligence in the Philippines: Upholding Client Trust and Diligence

A lawyer's failure to file a memorandum and return a client's money order leads to reprimand, reaffirming duties of diligence and fidelity.

Attorney Accountability Understanding Lawyer Negligence AND Upholding Client Trust IN THE Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court suspends lawyer for gross negligence, explaining counsel's duties of fidelity, diligence, and proper withdrawal under the Code of Professional Responsibility.

Psychological Incapacity: Abandonment and Infidelity Alone Insufficient for Marriage Nullity

The Supreme Court clarifies that abandonment, infidelity, and even bigamy do not automatically prove psychological incapacity under Article 36 of the Family Code.

Upholding Marital Fidelity Disbarment FOR Lawyers Engaging IN Immoral Conduct

Disbarment for Notarizing Documents After Signatory’s Death: A Lesson in Notarial Integrity

A lawyer who notarized an SPA after the signatory had died was disbarred. The Court explains why notarization demands utmost fidelity.

Upholding Legal Ethics: A Lawyer's Duty of Candor and Fidelity in Property Transactions

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on lawyers' duty of candor, fidelity, and accountability in property transactions and legal representation.

Lawyers Must Uphold Diligence and Fidelity in Legal Representation

A lawyer who fails to file an appellate brief faces suspension. The Supreme Court affirms that neglect of a client's case violates the Code of Professional Responsibility.

Disbarment for Infidelity: Moral Standards in the Legal Profession

The Supreme Court disbarred a lawyer for marital infidelity, reaffirming that good moral character is a continuing requirement for all members of the bar.

Defense of Honor Justifying Homicide in Cases of Marital Fidelity

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on when defense of spouse can justify homicide, explaining unlawful aggression requirement.

Infidelity and the Bar: Disbarment for Immoral Conduct Outside Professional Duties

The Supreme Court disbarred a lawyer for adultery, ruling that gross immorality in private life warrants removal from the Bar.

Attorney's Duty of Fidelity: Neglect and Abandonment in Legal Representation

When a lawyer takes a client's money and disappears with case records, the Supreme Court draws a firm line on professional responsibility.

Infidelity AND Intent Understanding Homicide IN THE Heat OF Marital Betrayal

Judge Dismissed for Extramarital Affair: Gross Immorality in the Judiciary

Supreme Court dismisses judge for extramarital affair and child with another woman, ruling infidelity is gross immorality warranting removal from the bench.

Judicial Employees and Marital Fidelity: Upholding Ethical Standards in the Judiciary

Court employee found guilty of immorality for illicit relationship with married woman; explains ethical standards for judiciary staff.

Lawyer Reprimanded for Losing Client Trust: Fidelity Lessons from Curimatmat v. Gojar

A lawyer's duty of fidelity means keeping clients informed and appealing on time. The Supreme Court's reprimand in Curimatmat v. Gojar explains why.