From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 25–48 of 101 articles for “vat refund”

VAT Refund Claims: Why the 120-Day Rule Is Jurisdictional and Deadlines Matter

Learn how the Supreme Court's ruling in Aichi Forging clarifies the mandatory 120-day VAT refund waiting period and its impact on taxpayers.

Premature Filing of VAT Refund Claims: Strict Adherence to the 120-Day Rule

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the mandatory 120-day period for VAT refund claims and the consequences of premature filing.

VAT Refund Timeliness: The 120-Day Rule, BIR Ruling DA-489-03, and Strict Proof Requirements

Learn how the Supreme Court applied the San Roque doctrine to a prematurely filed VAT refund claim and the strict rules on zero-rated sales and invoicing.

Untangling VAT Refund Timelines: How a Misleading BIR Ruling Saved a Taxpayer's Claim

Philippine Supreme Court explains when a prematurely filed VAT refund claim survives, and why strict invoicing rules still apply.

VAT Refunds for Ecozone Enterprises: The Cross Border Doctrine Explained

Supreme Court clarifies when ecozone enterprises can claim VAT refunds and how the Cross Border Doctrine affects input tax claims.

Untimely Filing Dooms VAT Refund Claim Navigating Jurisdictional Deadlines IN TAX Appeals

Untimely Tax Refund Claims: The Mandatory 120+30 Day Rule

Why filing a VAT refund case before the 120-day period expires can cost a taxpayer everything, even a valid claim.

Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims: Protection Against BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court protects taxpayers who relied on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03, allowing premature VAT refund claims during the window period.

VAT Refund Claims: The 120-Day Rule, Equitable Estoppel, and the San Roque Window

The Supreme Court clarifies when a premature VAT refund claim may still prosper under the San Roque doctrine and equitable estoppel.

VAT Refund Timelines: Strict Compliance Prevails Over Prior BIR Rulings

Supreme Court clarifies mandatory 120+30 day VAT refund periods; late judicial claims fail despite BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03.

VAT Refund Denials: Why "Zero-Rated" Must Appear on Invoices

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on VAT refund claims: strict invoicing rules, including the "zero-rated" imprint, determine success.

Untimely VAT Refund Claims Strict Adherence To Prescriptive Periods

The Supreme Court clarifies strict prescriptive periods for VAT refund claims, denying Northern Mindanao Power Corporation's petition for late and premature filings.

Equitable Estoppel and Tax Refund Claims: Understanding the San Roque Exception

The Supreme Court clarifies when taxpayers may file judicial VAT refund claims without waiting 120 days, citing equitable estoppel.

Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims: When Taxpayers Can Bypass the 120-Day Rule

The Supreme Court clarifies when taxpayers may file VAT refund claims with the CTA without waiting for the 120-day period.

The 120-Day Rule and Equitable Estoppel in VAT Refund Claims

Understand the 120-day VAT refund rule, its exceptions, and how equitable estoppel protects taxpayers who filed judicial claims early.

VAT Refund Claims: Equitable Estoppel and Strict Interpretation of Tax Laws

Supreme Court ruling on VAT refund claims, transitional input tax credits, and the strict interpretation of tax laws in Fort Bonifacio Development Corporation v. CIR.

VAT Refund Rights Real Property Inventory AND Transitional Input TAX Credit

VAT Refund Claims: Strict Deadlines and Proper Documentation Required

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies VAT refund rules: strict 2-year filing deadlines and the necessity of official receipts for zero-rated services.

Strict Deadlines in VAT Refund Claims: The 120+30 Day Rule and Its Exceptions

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the mandatory 120+30 day periods for VAT refund claims, and the BIR ruling that temporarily allowed premature judicial appeals.

Navigating VAT Refund Timelines: How Premature Filing Can Still Succeed Under Equitable Estoppel

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when premature VAT refund claims may still prosper under equitable estoppel from BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03.

VAT Refund for Foreign Tourists Upheld: Tayam v. Recto and the Limits of Equal Protection

The Supreme Court upholds RA 12079's VAT refund for foreign tourists, ruling it does not violate equal protection or tax uniformity.

Navigating Tax Credit Claims: The Mandatory vs Directory Interpretation of Deadlines

The Supreme Court clarifies when VAT refund deadlines are mandatory and when taxpayers get relief from strict compliance.

VAT Refund Claims Substantiation AND Timeliness IN Zero Rated Sales

Strict 120+30 Day Rule for VAT Refund Claims in the Philippines

Learn the mandatory 120+30 day periods for VAT refund claims and why late judicial appeals are fatal under Philippine tax law.