From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 49–72 of 89 articles for “judicial misconduct”

Judicial Conduct and Mental Fitness: When Can a Philippine Judge Be Removed From Office

The Supreme Court clarifies the line between judicial misconduct and mental incapacity in removing a judge from office.

Judicial Misconduct AND Evidence Preservation Judges Suspension FOR Negligence AND Ignorance OF LAW

Judicial Misconduct: Judge Exceeds Authority in Preliminary Investigation

When a judge oversteps authority by conducting preliminary investigations, the Supreme Court steps in. Learn from Ribaya v. Binamira-Parcia.

Judicial Misconduct When Orders Reflect Bias AND Compromise Impartiality

Supreme Court fines judge for gross ignorance, grave misconduct, and bias in issuing irregular orders favoring a party's counsel.

Judicial Misconduct Prematurely Quashing Complaints AND Disregarding Legal Procedure

Judicial Misconduct When Personal Interest Undermines Impartiality

When a judge becomes a party to cases before his own court, dismissal from service is the fitting penalty.

Judicial Misconduct: A Judge's Accountability for Abuse of Power and Obstruction of Justice

Explore the Supreme Court's ruling on judicial misconduct, abuse of power, and obstruction of justice in City Prosecution Office v. Bersales.

Setting Bail Judges Must Consider Offenders Finances

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on bail discretion, judicial misconduct, and the duty of judges to resist pressure when setting bail.

Hold-Departure Orders, Judicial Misconduct, and the Cost of Ignorance of the Law

Administrative case clarifies when judges may issue hold-departure orders — and the penalties for getting it wrong.

Judicial Misconduct: The Imperative of Due Process in Granting Injunctive Relief

A judge's failure to observe notice and hearing requirements before issuing injunctive relief constitutes grave abuse of authority, warranting administrative sanction.

Judicial Misconduct When Impartiality and Procedural Rules Collide

A judge's duty to remain impartial and follow procedural rules, explained through a Philippine Supreme Court administrative case.

Judicial Misconduct: Upholding Integrity and Preventing Abuse of Authority

Supreme Court suspends judge for six months for abuse of authority, grave misconduct, and intemperate language in Sy v. Fineza.

TRO Limits: Administrative Circular No. 20-95 and Judicial Misconduct

A judge's TRO without summary hearing violated Administrative Circular No. 20-95, resulting in a fine for grave abuse of authority.

Judicial Misconduct: Court Fines Retired Judge for Gross Inefficiency

Supreme Court holds retired judges accountable for gross inefficiency, imposing fines deductible from retirement benefits.

Upholding Ethical Standards in Court Liability for Discourtesy, Negligence, and Premature Judgments

A Supreme Court ruling on judicial misconduct in issuing TROs over customs seizure cases, reinforcing ethical standards for judges.

Judicial Misconduct When Notarization Exceeds A Judges Authority

Judicial Misconduct Dismissal FOR Undue Delay AND Disregard OF Supreme Court Directives

Learn how the Supreme Court disciplined a judge for undue delay and ignoring Court directives, reinforcing accountability in the judiciary.

Judicial Misconduct Upholding Impartiality AND Integrity IN THE Philippine Judiciary

Dismissal for Judicial Misconduct: Impartiality and Diligence in Granting Hospital Confinement

A judge's dismissal for granting hospital confinement without hearing shows why diligence and impartiality are non-negotiable in every judicial act.

Separation of Powers: Supreme Court's Exclusive Authority Over Judicial Misconduct

The Supreme Court asserts exclusive administrative supervision over judges, directing the Ombudsman to defer and refer cases involving judicial misconduct.

Judicial Misconduct THE High Cost OF Impropriety IN Custody OF Evidence

Judicial Misconduct: Upholding Honesty and Efficiency in the Philippine Judiciary

A judge's delay in deciding cases and dishonesty in JBC forms led to suspension and fine, reinforcing judicial accountability.

Judicial Misconduct: The Limits of Helping and the Imperative of Impartiality

A look at how the Supreme Court defines judicial misconduct, emphasizing the limits of assistance and the non-negotiable duty of impartiality for judges.

Judicial Ethics Under Scrutiny: Accountability for Misconduct Outside the Courtroom

A look at how the Supreme Court treats judicial misconduct committed outside court, and what it means for public trust in the judiciary.