From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 49–72 of 101 articles for “vat refund”

Navigating VAT Refund Deadlines Strict Compliance Under THE Nirc

Untimely Appeal Strict Deadlines For VAT Refund Claims In The Philippines

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the mandatory 120-day and 30-day deadlines for VAT refund claims, including the exception for premature judicial filings.

Strict Compliance: The Mandatory Nature of VAT Refund Periods Under the NIRC

The Supreme Court rules that the 120+30 day periods for VAT refund claims are mandatory and jurisdictional, dismissing a belated judicial claim.

Untangling VAT Refund Claims: The 120-Day Rule and Reliance on BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court clarifies when VAT refund judicial claims must be filed, and how BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 protected taxpayers.

VAT Refund Claims: Prescriptive Periods and Jurisdictional Requirements Explained

Learn the strict deadlines for VAT refund claims under Section 112 NIRC, including the 120+30 day rule and its exceptions.

VAT Refund for Foreign Tourists Upheld: Equal Protection and Taxation Rules Explained

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the VAT refund law for foreign tourists, explaining the limits of equal protection in taxation.

VAT Refund Claims: Strict Deadlines and Invoice Requirements Under Philippine Tax Law

Learn how the Supreme Court's ruling in CIR v. Silicon Philippines clarifies the mandatory 120+30 day prescriptive periods for VAT refund claims and invoice requirements.

VAT Refund Claims: The 120-Day Waiting Period and the BIR Ruling That Saved It

The Supreme Court clarifies the 120-day waiting period for VAT refund claims and the effect of BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03.

VAT Refund Claims: The Mandatory 120+30 Day Rule and Why Timing Matters

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that VAT refund claims must strictly follow the mandatory 120+30 day period under the NIRC.

Equitable Estoppel and Premature VAT Refund Claims: When Taxpayers Can Rely on BIR Rulings

The Supreme Court ruled that taxpayers may rely on BIR Ruling No. DA-489-03 and file VAT refund claims early, invoking equitable estoppel against the government.

Untimely VAT Refund Claims: Strict Prescriptive Periods and the San Roque Exception

Learn how the Supreme Court applied the San Roque doctrine on the 120-day waiting period for VAT refund claims in Procter & Gamble.

Premature Filing of Tax Refund Claims: Strict Compliance with the 120-Day Rule

The Supreme Court clarifies that taxpayers must wait for the 120-day period before filing judicial claims for VAT refunds.

VAT Refunds: Strict Compliance With the 120+30 Day Rule and Invoicing Requirements

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the mandatory 120+30 day rule for VAT refund claims and invoicing requirements in Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Toledo Power Company.

VAT Refund Timeliness: Strict Deadlines for Appealing BIR Decisions

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies mandatory 120+30 day periods for VAT refund judicial claims, citing CBK Power v. CIR.

Navigating VAT Refund Timelines: The Mandatory 120-30 Day Rule and Equitable Exceptions

Understand the mandatory 120+30 day rule for VAT refund claims in the Philippines, its jurisdictional nature, and the equitable exceptions recognized by the Supreme Court.

Untimely Tax Refund Claims: The 120+30 Day Rule Is Mandatory and Jurisdictional

The Supreme Court clarifies that VAT refund claims must follow the 120+30 day rule under (D) of the NIRC, with limited exceptions.

Navigating VAT Refund Deadlines Equitable Estoppel AND THE 12030 DAY Rule

VAT Refund Claims: The 120-Day Rule and Timely Appeals to the CTA

Learn the mandatory 120+30 day periods for VAT refund claims and how the Supreme Court applies them in CIR v. GST Philippines.

Navigating VAT Refund Claims: Mandatory Periods and the Operative Fact Doctrine

The Supreme Court clarifies the mandatory 120+30 day periods for VAT refund claims and when the operative fact doctrine applies.

VAT Refund Claims: Strict Compliance with Invoicing Requirements Required

Philippine Supreme Court rules strict compliance with VAT invoicing requirements is mandatory for input VAT refund claims on zero-rated sales.

VAT Refund Claims: Strict Invoicing Rules and the Definition of Capital Goods

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies strict invoicing requirements and capital goods definition for VAT refund claims in Bonifacio Water Corporation case.

Navigating VAT Refund Claims: Prescriptive Periods and Equitable Estoppel in Philippine Tax Law

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies the two-year prescriptive period for VAT refund claims and the mandatory 120-day waiting period before judicial appeal.

VAT Refund Deadlines: San Roque Doctrine on the 120-Day Rule and Judicial Claims

The Supreme Court's San Roque ruling clarifies the mandatory 120-day period for VAT refund claims and its exceptions.

Unlocking VAT Refunds: The Transitional Input Tax Credit Principle in Philippine Law

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that prior tax payment is not required to claim the 8% transitional input tax credit under the NIRC.