From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 793–816 of 1,236 articles for “judge”

Judicial Authority and Preliminary Investigations: Balancing Power and Procedure

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that municipal trial court judges may conduct preliminary investigations, and errors in judgment alone do not warrant administrative liability.

Judge Dismissed for Interfering with Warrant Arrest and Abusing Contempt Power

Supreme Court dismisses judge for obstructing a warrant arrest and retaliating with baseless contempt proceedings, reaffirming judicial accountability.

Misappropriation of Litigant Funds Leads to Judge's Dismissal

Supreme Court dismisses judge for misappropriating P78,000 in fiduciary funds entrusted by litigants, violating Circular No. 50-95.

Upholding Preliminary Investigation Rights: A Judge's Duty to Ensure Due Process

When a judge skips preliminary investigation, due process suffers. This ruling clarifies a judge's non-waivable duty to protect the accused's substantive rights.

Judicial Efficiency Imperative Resolving Cases Within Prescribed Deadlines

Why Philippine judges must resolve cases within constitutional deadlines, and the consequences of delay, explained through a Supreme Court ruling.

Judicial Efficiency: The Imperative of Timely Case Resolution in Philippine Courts

A Supreme Court ruling on a judge's 90-day case resolution duty, its constitutional basis, and the consequences of delay.

Undue Delay in Rendering Decisions: A Judge's Administrative Liability

Learn how the Supreme Court penalizes judges for undue delay in deciding cases, and what the 90-day rule means for litigants.

Judge Fined FOR Ignoring DUE Process IN Granting Bail FOR Murder Suspect

Upholding Judicial Efficiency: Judges Must Observe Session Hours and Avoid Unnecessary Delays

Supreme Court admonishes judge for absenteeism and delays, reaffirming strict session hours and prompt case disposition as judicial duties.

When Court Personnel Fail: Administrative Liability for Delayed Summons Service

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on process servers, clerks of court, and judges liable for delayed summons service in civil cases.

Upholding Accountability: The Duty of Judges to Resolve Cases Promptly

A Supreme Court ruling on judicial delay in resolving a formal offer of exhibits, and the limits of liability for inaccurate certificates of service.

Judicial Accountability: Timely Decisions and Truthful Certificates of Service

A Supreme Court ruling holds a judge liable for a nine-month delay in resolving a routine motion, while dismissing the charge of untruthful service certificates.

Rape Conviction Upheld: Mental Capacity and the Meaning of Force and Intimidation

A Philippine Supreme Court ruling explains how force and intimidation in rape are judged, especially when the victim has mental retardation and cannot resist.

Judicial Efficiency: Sanctions for Undue Delay in Rendering Decisions

A judge's failure to decide cases within 90 days is undue delay, a less serious offense under Rule 140.

Judicial Accountability: Dismissal of Charges Requires Evidence Beyond Bare Allegations

Administrative complaints against judges must rest on competent evidence, not suspicion. The Supreme Court's ruling in Mijares clarifies when judges may be held liable.

Administrative Liability of Judges: Errors of Judgment vs. Misconduct

Explaining when judges face administrative liability for legal errors, citing the dismissal of charges against Judge Legaspi.

Judicial Discretion vs Mandatory Rules: Extending Search Warrant Validity

The Supreme Court clarifies when a judge's erroneous extension of a search warrant's validity is an administrative offense or a protected error of judgment.

Judicial Conduct: Errors of Judgment vs Misconduct in Philippine Courts

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when a judge's error is mere error of judgment versus administrative misconduct requiring bad faith.

Supreme Court Dismisses Judge for Gross Immorality in Extramarital Affair Case

The Supreme Court dismissed a judge for gross immorality over an extramarital affair and child, while suspending him from law practice for three years.

Judge Not Liable for Denying Motion to Dissolve Writ: Administrative Case Dismissed

Supreme Court clarifies when judges may face administrative liability for erroneous orders, dismissing complaint against Baguio RTC judge.

When Can a Judge Be Disciplined for an Erroneous Ruling? Lessons from De Guzman v. Pamintuan

The Supreme Court clarifies that judges are not automatically disciplined for every erroneous ruling—only for errors tainted by bad faith, fraud, malice, or dishonesty.

Judicial Accountability: Dismissal for Disobeying Court Orders and Gross Ignorance of the Law

A judge's refusal to issue a writ of execution leads to dismissal for gross ignorance of the law and defiance of superior court orders.

Judicial Accountability: Signing Marriage Contracts Without Licenses Is Negligence

Philippine Supreme Court holds judges liable for signing marriage contracts without licenses, ruling it constitutes gross negligence in judicial duties.

Judicial Accountability: Fines for Delayed Case Resolutions and Disregarding Court Directives

Supreme Court ruling on judge fined P20,000 for delayed decisions and ignoring directives, reinforcing judicial accountability.