Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 97120 of 129 articles for nacc

Affidavits of Desistance: When Do They Overturn a Guilty Verdict?

When can an affidavit of desistance overturn a guilty verdict? The Supreme Court explains in Santos v. People.

Attempted Rape Conviction Upheld Despite Retraction and Blotter Gaps

Supreme Court affirms attempted rape conviction, explaining why recantations and police blotter entries carry little weight in Philippine criminal cases.

Rape and Incest: Minor Testimony Inconsistencies Don't Undermine Conviction

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on how minor inconsistencies in a rape victim's testimony don't weaken her credibility, and why minority must be proven.

The Weight of a Minor's Testimony in Rape Cases: Credibility vs Presumption of Innocence

How Philippine courts weigh a minor rape victim's testimony against the presumption of innocence, and when delay in reporting does not destroy credibility.

Judicial Stability Doctrine: Resolving Jurisdictional Conflicts Between Co-Equal Courts

Philippine Supreme Court explains the doctrine of judicial stability and how co-equal courts resolve jurisdictional conflicts without overstepping authority.

Expediting Justice: Holding Judges Accountable for Case Delays

The Supreme Court affirms sanctions against a Sandiganbayan Presiding Justice for gross inefficiency, underscoring that judges must decide cases within 90 days.

Eyewitness Testimony vs. Alibi: Proving Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt in Murder Cases

How a credible eyewitness account outweighs alibi and denial in Philippine murder convictions, per People v. Ticalo.

Amendment of Information: Balancing Procedural Rules and the Accused's Right to Due Process

When can the prosecution amend an Information after the accused pleads? The Supreme Court clarifies the distinction between formal and substantial amendments.

Positive Identification Overrules Alibi in Vergara Robbery Case

Supreme Court affirms robbery conviction, holding that a victim's positive identification prevails over an accused's alibi and bare denial.

Reforming Insurance Policies How Manifest Intent Prevails Over Technical Descriptions In Property Claims

A fire insurance dispute shows how courts prioritize the parties' true intent over technical misdescriptions in policies.

Prescription Periods in Graft Cases: The Discovery Rule for Ill-Gotten Wealth

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when the prescription period for graft cases begins—from discovery, not commission, of the offense.

Understanding Treachery in Murder Cases: Insights from People v. Barro Jr.

Learn how Philippine courts define treachery in murder cases and why alibi fails against positive identification, based on a Supreme Court ruling.

Maintaining Workplace Decorum: Lessons on Grave Misconduct from the Philippine Supreme Court

A Supreme Court ruling on a belligerent employee shows why workplace decorum is non-negotiable in the Philippine public service.

Philippine Supreme Court Disciplines Court Employee for Disrespectful Conduct in Workplace

The Supreme Court fined a court employee P5,000 for shouting at and humiliating a co-worker during office hours, reaffirming strict standards of decorum in the judiciary.

Credibility in Rape Cases: Why Minor Inconsistencies Don't Always Matter in Philippine Courts

Philippine Supreme Court explains why minor inconsistencies in a rape victim's testimony do not destroy credibility, especially in incestuous rape cases.

Unpacking Treachery: How Philippine Courts Define Murder

A look at how Philippine courts define treachery in murder cases, and why eyewitness identification must overcome reasonable doubt.

Sheriff’s Authority in Property Levy: What Francisco v. Cruz Teaches About Execution Sales

Learn how Francisco v. Cruz defines a sheriff’s limits in property levy and execution sales, and how to protect your rights.

Pre-Trial Orders Control Your Case: The Tiu v. Middleton Rule on Witness Exclusion

Pre-trial orders bind trial proceedings. Learn from Tiu v. Middleton why unnamed witnesses may still testify and how to protect your case.

Upholding Judicial Impartiality: Why Private Judge-Litigant Communication Is Unacceptable in Philippine Courts

The Supreme Court admonishes a judge for private calls to a litigant, reaffirming that judges must not only be impartial but also appear impartial.

The Price of Silence: Witness Credibility and the Duty to Report in Criminal Cases

Supreme Court affirms rape conviction, ruling that a victim's silence and lack of immediate report do not destroy credibility.

Eyewitness Identification Prevails Over Alibi in Philippine Murder Convictions

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on eyewitness identification versus alibi in murder cases, explaining standards for credibility and positive identification.

Homicide or Murder: Decoding Treachery and Premeditation in Philippine Criminal Law

The Supreme Court explains when treachery and evident premeditation qualify a killing as murder, and when the crime remains homicide.

How Eyewitness Testimony Secures Justice in Philippine Murder Cases

The Supreme Court explains how a lone eyewitness's testimony can establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt in murder cases, as shown in People v. Mante.

Deadfreight and Demurrage in Charter Parties: NFA v. Hongfil Shipping

Supreme Court clarifies when charterers owe deadfreight but not demurrage, and when corporate officers escape personal liability.