Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Showing 124 of 573 articles for evidence

When Courts Must Defer to CIAC: The Limited Review of Construction Arbitral Awards

The Supreme Court clarifies the narrow grounds for overturning CIAC arbitral awards, reaffirming judicial restraint in construction disputes.

Job Offer Accepted but Withdrawn Before Start Date: The Aragones Ruling on Perfected Employment Contracts

A job offer accepted is a perfected employment contract. Learn the Supreme Court's ruling in Aragones v. Alltech and what it means for employers and employees.

Double Sale in the Philippines: Good Faith and Due Diligence in Property Disputes

A buyer who fails to inspect the property before purchase cannot claim good faith in a double sale. The Supreme Court explains why.

Trafficking Conviction Upheld Despite Acquittal on Child Prostitution Charges

Supreme Court affirms trafficking conviction even where child prostitution charges fail for lack of proof of minority, clarifying key evidentiary rules.

Finality of Judgments: COA Cannot Reverse Absolved Parties' Liability

The Supreme Court rules that the COA cannot reverse a final decision absolving employee-recipients from refunding disallowed benefits, reinforcing finality principles.

When a Lawyer’s Personal Debt Isn’t Professional Misconduct: Palaganas v. Panganiban

The Supreme Court clarifies that administrative cases against lawyers are for professional misconduct, not debt collection, in Palaganas v. Panganiban.

Attorney-Client Loans Under the CPRA: When Borrowing From a Client Is Allowed

The Supreme Court clarifies when lawyers may borrow from clients under the CPRA, balancing ethical duties with legitimate commercial dealings.

Lawyer Suspended for Abusive Language and Disrespect for Legal Processes

The Supreme Court suspended a lawyer for urging police to shoot her nephew and using intemperate language in pleadings—a reminder of ethical limits.

Reasonable Doubt in Illegal Gambling: Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Cara y Cruz Case

Supreme Court acquits two men of illegal gambling under PD 1602, ruling that vague police testimony cannot overcome the presumption of innocence.

Rape and Adoption: When Retroactive Laws Cannot Elevate a Conviction

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies why a 2012 rape involving an adopted child could not be elevated to qualified rape under a later law.

Psychological Incapacity Under Article 36: Abandonment, Infidelity, and the Cabutaje Ruling

The Supreme Court clarifies proof requirements for psychological incapacity in the Cabutaje case, addressing abandonment, infidelity, and expert testimony.

When a Corporate Officer Escapes Civil Liability for a Bounced Check Under BP 22

The Supreme Court clarifies that an acquitted corporate officer cannot be held personally liable for a dishonored corporate check under BP 22.

Unauthorized Foreshore Structures as Public Nuisance: Calimlim v. Goño

The Supreme Court rules that unauthorized structures on foreshore land constitute a public nuisance and must be removed.

When a Parent Pays for Property in a Child's Name: Implied Trusts vs. Presumed Donations

Philippine law presumes a donation when a parent pays for property titled in a child's name. Learn how to overturn this presumption.

Oral Share Sale Agreements in the Philippines: Enforceability and Remedies After Breach

Learn when oral agreements to sell shares are enforceable in the Philippines, and the remedies available when a seller backs out.

Conditional Sale vs. Contract to Sell: A Supreme Court Ruling on Ownership, Breach, and Forum Shopping

The Supreme Court clarifies when a "conditional sale" is really a contract to sell, and warns against forum shopping in property disputes.

Judicial Clemency for Philippine Lawyers: The Ruiz Case and the Path to Reinstatement

Learn how judicial clemency works for disciplined Philippine lawyers, including the requirements under the CPRA and the landmark Ruiz case.

Defective Information in VAWC Cases: When Lack of Specificity Leads to Acquittal

The Supreme Court acquitted a VAWC accused because the Information failed to allege mental or emotional anguish, a crucial element under Section 5(i) of RA 9262.

Graft Conviction Overturned: Undue Injury and Burden of Proof Under RA 3019

When does a procurement violation become graft? The Supreme Court clarifies undue injury and the burden of proof under Section 3(e) of RA 3019.

Psychological Incapacity After Marriage: The Boado Ruling on Article 36 Nullity

The Supreme Court clarifies when psychological incapacity can void a marriage, even if it manifests years after the wedding ceremony.

Qualified Theft vs. Simple Theft: When Does Grave Abuse of Confidence Apply?

The Supreme Court clarifies when employee theft becomes qualified theft, requiring proof of special trust beyond ordinary employer-employee relations.

Good Faith Defense: When Public Officials Can Avoid Liability for Disallowed Fund Transfers

The Supreme Court clarifies when good faith shields public officials from personal liability in COA disallowances involving PDAF fund transfers.

Scattershot Search Warrants: The “One Specific Offense” Rule Explained

When does a search warrant become an invalid “scattershot” warrant? The Supreme Court clarifies the “one specific offense” rule in Puguon v. People.

Double Jeopardy in the Philippines: When an Acquittal Can Be Overturned

Philippine law protects against double jeopardy, but an acquittal can be voided if the State's right to due process is violated. Learn the exception.