From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 1–22 of 22 articles for “cybercrime”

Cybersecurity Law in the Philippines: Compliance and Incident Response

Learn Philippine cybersecurity law compliance under the Cybercrime Prevention Act and Data Privacy Act, including penalties and incident response duties.

When a Facebook Post Becomes a Crime: VAWC, Social Media, and Higher Penalties

The Supreme Court rules that using Facebook to commit psychological abuse under VAWC warrants a higher penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

Cyber-Enabled Robbery in the Philippines: How RA 10175 Raises Penalties for Digital Extortion

Learn how the Supreme Court applies the Cybercrime Prevention Act to robbery committed through digital means, and why penalties are one degree higher.

Robbery and Cybercrime: Protecting Yourself From Digital Extortion in the Philippines

The Supreme Court clarifies how online threats to expose intimate photos can constitute robbery, and why the Cybercrime Prevention Act raises the penalty.

Cyber Libel Retroactivity: When Online Posts Before RA 10175 Are Not Punishable

The Supreme Court clarifies that Facebook posts made before the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012 cannot be prosecuted as cyber libel.

Psychological Abuse via Facebook: Higher Penalty Under Cybercrime Law

Supreme Court rules posting demeaning messages on Facebook constitutes psychological abuse under RA 9262, with higher penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Higher Penalty for Social Media Harassment

Supreme Court rules that using Facebook to commit psychological abuse under RA 9262 warrants a higher penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

Supreme Court: Online Posts Can Prove Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262

Social media posts can establish psychological abuse under RA 9262, and using Facebook raises the penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: When Facebook Posts Become Crimes

The Supreme Court clarifies when social media posts constitute psychological abuse under RA 9262 and how the Cybercrime Prevention Act raises the penalty.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Proving Social Media Authorship and Higher Penalties

Supreme Court clarifies how to prove social media authorship in VAWC cases and rules that using Facebook raises the penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Proving Social Media Authorship and Higher Penalties

Supreme Court clarifies how to prove social media authorship in VAWC psychological abuse cases and applies higher cybercrime penalties.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Higher Penalties for Social Media Offenses

Supreme Court clarifies that using Facebook to commit psychological abuse under RA 9262 warrants a higher penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

When Social Media Abuse Raises the Penalty Under RA 9262 and the Cybercrime Law

The Supreme Court clarifies when using Facebook to commit psychological abuse triggers a higher penalty under RA 9262 and RA 10175.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Higher Penalty for Social Media Offenses

Supreme Court rules that using social media to commit psychological abuse under RA 9262 warrants a higher penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

Navigating Search Warrants: Privacy and Public Interest in Cybercrime Investigations

The Supreme Court clarifies when search warrants in cybercrime cases are valid, balancing constitutional privacy rights against effective law enforcement.

Psychological Abuse via Facebook Conviction Upheld with Higher Cybercrime Penalty

Supreme Court affirms conviction for psychological abuse via Facebook posts, imposing higher penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

Online Psychological Abuse Under VAWC: Higher Penalty When Committed Through Social Media

Supreme Court clarifies that using Facebook to commit psychological abuse under RA 9262 warrants a higher penalty under the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Proving Facebook Post Authorship and Higher Penalties

The Supreme Court clarifies how to prove Facebook post authorship in VAWC cases and applies higher cybercrime penalties for online psychological abuse.

Online Psychological Abuse and Higher Penalties Under RA 9262 and the Cybercrime Law

The Supreme Court affirms a conviction for online psychological abuse under RA 9262 and raises the penalty because the offense was committed through Facebook.

Supreme Court Rules on Social Media as Qualifying Circumstance in VAWC Cases

The Supreme Court clarifies when social media use raises the penalty for psychological abuse under VAWC, citing Section 6 of the Cybercrime Prevention Act.

Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262: Penalty Raised for Social Media Use

Supreme Court affirms VAWC conviction for Facebook post, raises penalty for ICT use under Cybercrime Law.

Supreme Court on Online Psychological Abuse Under RA 9262 and Cybercrime Law

The Supreme Court affirms a conviction for online psychological abuse under RA 9262 and raises the penalty for using social media under RA 10175.