From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 121–124 of 124 articles for “taking”

Sort:Newest Oldest

Oct 14, 1998 criminal-law robbery-with-homicide revised-penal-code supreme-court criminal-intent philippine-law

Intent Is Key: Distinguishing Robbery With Homicide From Separate Crimes in Philippine Law

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that robbery with homicide requires proof of intent to rob before the killing, not merely taking property afterward.

Jul 11, 1997 robbery kidnapping criminal law revised penal code supreme court people v sinoc

Robbery vs Kidnapping: Distinguishing Intent in Philippine Criminal Law

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies when taking a vehicle with violence is robbery, not kidnapping, in People v. Sinoc.

Mar 25, 1997 judicial misconduct bribery graft administrative case supreme court judges

When Can a Judge Be Held Liable for Taking Bribes: A Philippine Case Study

A Supreme Court ruling on judicial misconduct shows when a judge can be dismissed for bribery and corrupt practices.

Nov 20, 1996 robbery with homicide animus lucrandi asportation revised penal code supreme court

Robbery With Homicide: How Intent to Gain and Taking Are Established

Philippine Supreme Court explains how intent to gain and the element of taking are proven in robbery with homicide cases.