From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 145–168 of 532 articles for “judges”

Upholding Judicial Integrity Responsibilities OF Judges AND Court Personnel IN Bail Bond Approvals

Judicial Accountability: Upholding the Duty to Decide Cases Promptly

The Supreme Court fined a retiring judge P50,000 for leaving 43 cases undecided, affirming that judges must rule within the 90-day period.

Upholding Judicial Independence: Protecting Judges From Collateral Attacks on Final Judgments

The Supreme Court shields its members from collateral attacks via criminal complaints, reaffirming that only it can declare its own judgments unjust.

Judicial Misconduct: The High Cost of Incorrigible Ignorance in the Philippine Judiciary

A judge's fourth gross ignorance conviction leads to dismissal. Learn the rules judges must follow and why persistence in error is fatal.

Upholding the Integrity of Buy-Bust Operations and Chain of Custody in Drug Cases

A Supreme Court ruling reminds judges to decide cases promptly, underscoring how delay undermines the integrity of drug buy-bust operations and chain of custody.

Judicial Accountability: The Cost of Undue Delay in Resolving Motions

When a Court of Appeals justice sat on a motion for nearly three years, the Supreme Court imposed a fine, reaffirming that judges must decide cases promptly.

Judicial Immunity and Unsubstantiated Administrative Complaints Against Judges

Philippine courts dismiss administrative complaints against judges when the allegations are unsupported and the acts complained of are judicial in nature.

Judicial Efficiency and Ethical Conduct: Lessons from a Judge's Administrative Liability

The Supreme Court reminds judges that delay in deciding cases is gross inefficiency and a breach of judicial and professional ethics.

Accountability in the Judiciary: Prompt Resolution of Cases and Timely Transmission of Records

A Supreme Court ruling reminds judges and clerks of court of their duty to decide cases promptly and transmit records on time.

Judges Must Independently Assess Withdrawal of Criminal Informations

Learn the Supreme Court's rule on withdrawal of criminal informations and the judge's duty of independent assessment before approving dismissal.

Judicial Overreach: Defining the Limits of Disciplinary Authority in the Philippine Judiciary

A Supreme Court ruling clarifies that executive judges cannot unilaterally impose penalties on court personnel, reaffirming the Court's exclusive disciplinary power.

Habitual Absenteeism in the Philippine Judiciary: What the Supreme Court Says

Explore how the Supreme Court treats habitual absenteeism among judges and court personnel, and the disciplinary consequences under Philippine law.

Judicial Discretion vs Mandatory Duty: Voluntary Inhibition of Judges in the Philippines

Explaining the difference between mandatory and voluntary inhibition of judges under Rule 137, and when a judge may step aside.

Judicial Ethics: When Judges Squabble, Both Face Administrative Liability

A Supreme Court ruling on two RTC judges fined for a public altercation shows why decorum is a non-negotiable judicial duty.

Judicial Accountability When Inefficiency AND Neglect Tarnish THE Bench

Explore how judicial inefficiency and neglect can erode public trust, and the standards for holding judges accountable.

Upholding Judicial Efficiency: Disciplinary Actions for Delayed Case Resolution in the Philippine Judiciary

The Supreme Court holds judges and clerks of court accountable for delayed case resolution, reinforcing the constitutional right to speedy disposition of cases.

Dismissal for Undue Delay: A Judge's Accountability for Timely Case Resolution

Explore how Philippine courts hold judges accountable for undue delay in resolving cases, and what this means for litigants seeking timely justice.

When Judges Fail to Decide Cases: Court Rules on Gross Neglect of Duty

Supreme Court dismisses judge for failing to decide cases for years, ruling that heavy caseload is no excuse for judicial delay.

Lawyers Must Substantiate Claims Against Judges: Notarial Ethics and Administrative Liability

A lawyer's baseless accusations against a judge and notarial violations led to suspension and disqualification from notarial commission.

Judicial Accountability: Judges and Court Personnel Liable for Negligence in Bail Bond Processing

Supreme Court holds judge and clerk of court liable for gross neglect in approving bail without required documents, imposing fines on retirement benefits.

Judicial Conduct: A Judge's Duty to Uphold Impartiality and Avoid Misconduct

The Supreme Court reminds judges that even well-intentioned suggestions to litigants can cross the line into misconduct, eroding public trust in the judiciary.

Judicial Misconduct and Due Process: When Courts Can Try a Judge for Off-Duty Acts

The Supreme Court clarifies that judges may face criminal trial in regular courts for off-duty acts, while administrative supervision stays with the Court.

Judicial Immunity When CAN Judges BE Held Liable FOR Reckless Acts

Judicial Impartiality: Why Judges Must Avoid Financial Dealings With Litigants

A judge borrowed money from a party-litigant in a pending case. The Supreme Court explains why this violates judicial conduct rules.