Legal Insights
Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.
Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.
Judicial Efficiency THE Imperative OF Timely Case Resolution IN Philippine Courts 3
Judicial Efficiency and Prompt Case Resolution: Administrative Liability for Court Delays
Philippine Supreme Court holds judges administratively liable for delayed case resolution, emphasizing speedy disposition as a constitutional right.
Expediting Justice: Why Election Protests Favor Speed Over Rigid Procedure
In Quintos v. COMELEC, the Supreme Court allowed a trial court first access to contested ballot boxes, showing that speedy election protest resolution outweighs rigid rules.
Finality of Judgment in Disbarment Cases: The Bihag v. Era Resolution
The Supreme Court enforces final disbarment decisions, citing a lawyer for contempt and ordering execution of the judgment.
Judicial Accountability: Timely Resolution and Due Process in Court Proceedings
A Supreme Court ruling on a judge's undue delay and gross ignorance of the law, and the importance of due process in court proceedings.
Corporate Authority vs Surety: When Board Resolutions and Personal Guarantees Collide
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on corporate authority, board resolutions, and surety liability in a discounting transaction.
Cyber Libel Prescription in the Philippines: One-Year Rule and the Limits of Unsigned Resolutions
The Supreme Court clarifies that cyber libel prescribes in one year and that unsigned resolutions are not binding precedent.
Judicial Efficiency: The Imperative of Timely Case Resolution and Consequences of Delay
A judge's heavy caseload does not excuse delayed rulings. This case explains the duty to decide promptly and the penalties for failure.
Cyber Libel Prescription in the Philippines: One-Year Rule and the Weight of Unsigned Resolutions
The Supreme Court clarifies that cyber libel prescribes in one year and that unsigned resolutions do not create binding precedent.
Judicial Accountability Balancing Independence AND Diligence IN Case Resolution
The Supreme Court clarifies that the 60-day period for filing certiorari is counted from receipt of the denial of a motion for reconsideration.
Judicial Accountability: Timely Case Resolution and Efficiency in Philippine Courts
A Supreme Court ruling on a judge fined for delayed case decisions underscores the duty of Philippine judges to resolve cases within reglementary periods.
Extradition in the Philippines: Balancing Due Process and International Cooperation
Philippine courts can provisionally rule on a plaintiff's death in ejectment cases, balancing due process with the need for swift resolution.
Judicial Accountability Timely Case Resolution AND Disciplinary Actions FOR Delays
Judicial Efficiency Upholding Timely Resolution Mandates IN Election Protests
Court rules judges must decide election protests within 30 days of submission, imposing fines for inexcusable delay.
Judicial Efficiency: The Imperative of Timely Case Resolution in Philippine Courts
A Supreme Court ruling on a judge's delay in deciding a murder case underscores the constitutional mandate for courts to resolve cases within 90 days.
Notice to Counsel Counts for Appeal Deadlines in NLRC Cases
Supreme Court rules that receipt of NLRC resolution by counsel, not the party, starts the 60-day period for filing certiorari with the Court of Appeals.
Judicial Efficiency: The Imperative of Timely Case Resolution and Accountability for Delays
A Supreme Court ruling reminds judges that missing the three-month deadline to decide cases is gross inefficiency, even if transcripts are delayed or parties ask for more time.
Upholding Judicial Efficiency: The Consequences of Delay in Case Resolution
A judge's four-month delay in deciding a summary procedure case leads to a fine, reinforcing the constitutional right to speedy disposition of cases.
Upholding Judicial Efficiency: Timely Resolution of Motions in Estate Proceedings
The Supreme Court reminds judges that failing to resolve motions within 90 days is gross inefficiency, even in complex estate cases.
Consolidation of Cases: Ensuring Comprehensive Justice and Preventing Inconsistent Rulings
When related cases involve the same parties, Philippine courts may order consolidation to ensure comprehensive, consistent resolution of all issues.
Arbitration Agreements and Third Parties: Defining Contractual Boundaries in Dispute Resolution
Philippine Supreme Court ruling on arbitration clauses, third-party effects, and when courts may decline to compel arbitration.
Service of Resolutions When DOJ Rules Prevail Over the Rules of Court
When do DOJ rules on service of resolutions override the Rules of Court? The Supreme Court clarifies in Tam Wing Tak v. Makasiar.
Speedy Trial Rights in the Philippines: How Long Is Too Long for Case Resolution
Philippine Supreme Court explains when delay violates the right to speedy disposition of cases, using the Blanco v. Sandiganbayan ruling.
Judicial Delay: Understanding the 90-Day Rule for Case Resolution in Philippine Courts
Philippine judges must decide cases within 90 days. Learn the rule, its legal basis, and consequences of delay.