From the library

Legal Insights

Plain-language guides and case briefs on Philippine law — researched from the firm's law library of 184,000+ statutes, Supreme Court decisions, and agency issuances, and written so non-lawyers can understand and act on them.

Have your own question? Ask ASG Legal AI now.

Get a cited, plain-language answer from 184,000+ statutes and decisions — free, no sign-up.

Ask a question

Showing 169–192 of 243 articles for “judicial accountability”

Judicial Accountability When Judges Overstep Supervisory Bounds and Circumvent Due Process

A Supreme Court ruling on when reprimanding a complainant violates due process, and why withdrawing an administrative complaint does not end the case.

Judicial Accountability and the Good Faith Defense Against Unjust Judgment Charges

Philippine Supreme Court clarifies that judges cannot be held administratively liable for erroneous rulings made in good faith, absent malice or bad faith.

Judicial Accountability: The Duty of Judges to Decide Cases Promptly

Philippine Supreme Court ruling on judges' duty to decide cases within 90 days, with penalties for delay under Rule 140.

Judicial Accountability A Judges Duty TO Personally Determine Probable Cause FOR Arrest

Judicial Accountability: The Duty of Judges to Decide Cases Promptly

Philippine Supreme Court holds judges accountable for undue delay in deciding cases, citing the constitutional duty to resolve matters within prescribed periods.

Judicial Accountability: The Duty to Decide Cases Promptly and the Price of Gross Inefficiency

The Supreme Court fined a retired judge P50,000 for gross inefficiency after he failed to decide 49 cases within the reglementary period.

Judicial Accountability: Gross Ignorance of Law in Issuing Erroneous Orders

When do a judge's errors become sanctionable? The Supreme Court explains in this administrative case involving a writ of seizure and a warrant of arrest.

Judicial Accountability: Delay in Rendering Decisions Constitutes Gross Inefficiency

Supreme Court holds judges accountable for delayed decisions, ruling that failure to decide cases within 90 days is gross inefficiency.

Judicial Accountability: Fines for Ignorance of Summary Procedure Rules

Court employees fined P4,000 each for gross ignorance of appeal fee rules under the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure.

Judicial Accountability: The Consequences of Undue Delay in Rendering Decisions

A retired judge fined for failing to decide cases on time—what this means for judicial accountability and the public's right to speedy justice.

Judge Fined for Delayed Execution Writ: A Lesson in Judicial Accountability

SC ruling: a judge's unreasonable delay in issuing a writ of execution is gross inefficiency, warranting a fine and stern warning.

Judicial Accountability in Case Disposal: Lessons from an MCTC Audit

A Supreme Court audit of a Rizal court shows how delays in deciding cases lead to administrative liability for judges and court personnel.

Judicial Accountability: Undue Delay in Rendering Decisions and Its Consequences

Philippine Supreme Court holds judges liable for undue delay in deciding cases, explaining the constitutional deadlines and penalties for non-compliance.

Judicial Accountability: The Price of Delay in Rendering Judgments

A judge who fails to decide a case on time faces administrative sanctions. Learn the rules on judicial delay and accountability.

Judicial Accountability: Timely Resolution and Due Process in Court Proceedings

A Supreme Court ruling on a judge's undue delay and gross ignorance of the law, and the importance of due process in court proceedings.

Judicial Accountability: Upholding Integrity and Efficiency in the Philippine Judiciary

The Supreme Court suspends a judge for gross misconduct, undue delay, and falsified certificates of service, reaffirming judicial accountability standards.

Judicial Accountability: Fines for Sheriffs Who Skip Raffle in Foreclosure Cases

Supreme Court fines sheriffs P1,000 each for failing to raffle an extrajudicial foreclosure petition, underscoring strict compliance with court procedure.

Judicial Accountability Upholding Timeliness AND Impartiality IN Court Proceedings

Judicial Accountability for Gross Ignorance of Law and Delay in Executing Final Judgments

When a judge refuses to execute a final judgment, the Supreme Court steps in. Learn the rules on execution and judicial accountability.

Judicial Accountability: The Imperative of Timely Decision Making in Philippine Courts

Philippine judges must decide cases within reglementary periods. This article examines a Supreme Court ruling on undue delay and its consequences.

Judicial Accountability Negligence and the Standard of Care for Judges in Approving Court Documents

The Supreme Court reminds judges that approving court documents demands diligence, not mere reliance on counsel.

Judicial Accountability Ensuring Impartiality AND Adherence TO Legal Procedure IN THE Philippine Court OF Appeals

Judicial Accountability Balancing Independence AND Diligence IN Case Resolution

The Supreme Court clarifies that the 60-day period for filing certiorari is counted from receipt of the denial of a motion for reconsideration.

Judicial Accountability: Timely Case Resolution and Efficiency in Philippine Courts

A Supreme Court ruling on a judge fined for delayed case decisions underscores the duty of Philippine judges to resolve cases within reglementary periods.